scholarly journals Abnormal Division of Radial Nerve Encountered during Fixation of Fracture of Shaft of Humerus through Anterior Approach

2021 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 80-81
Author(s):  
Periakaruppan Ramasamy ◽  
Masilamani Kalaivanan
Keyword(s):  
Radial Nerve ◽  
Anterior Approach

scholarly journals Minimally Invasive Plate Osteosynthesis in Humeral Shaft Fractures via Anterior Approach

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (13) ◽  
pp. 745-750
Author(s):  
Nikhilkumar Sureshkumar Oza ◽  
Ganesh A ◽  
Anand Kumar Singh ◽  
Pulin Bihari Das ◽  
Anurag Singh ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Scoring System ◽  
Radial Nerve ◽  
Anterior Approach ◽  
Plate Osteosynthesis ◽  
Case Series ◽  
Minimally Invasive Plate Osteosynthesis ◽  
Fracture Union ◽  
Excellent Outcome ◽  
Radial Nerve Injury

BACKGROUND This case series was conducted to evaluate the intraoperative and post-operative outcomes of fracture shaft of humerus managed by indirect reduction and minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis (MIPO) via anterior approach. METHODS In this case series 26 diaphyseal fractures of the humerus treated with MIPO, between June 2017 and February 2020 at a tertiary care hospital were included. All the patients were followed up for a minimum period of 2 years postoperatively. The objective was to evaluate these cases clinically for shoulder and elbow range of motion and document any complications. Other parameters such as duration of surgery and radiological time for fracture union were also documented. RESULTS The mean duration for surgery was 86.5 minutes. The University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) shoulder scoring system rated 18 patients (69.2 %) as excellent outcome, 07 patients (26.9 %) as good outcome, and 1 patient (3.8 %) as fair outcome. The MAYO Elbow Performance Scoring system rated 20 patients (76.9 %) as excellent outcome and 06 patients (23.1 %) as good outcome. About 96 % of patients achieved fracture union by the end of 16 weeks post-operatively (mean 13.4 weeks). No complications related to infection, iatrogenic radial nerve injury or implant failure were noted in the study. 4 cases had varus angulation deformity but did not affect shoulder or elbow function. CONCLUSIONS MIPO is a safe and effective technique for the management of diaphyseal humerus fractures, with early fracture healing, less risk of complications such as infection and iatrogenic radial nerve injury, along with a cosmetically acceptable scar. KEYWORDS Fracture Fixation, Fracture Healing, Humeral Fractures, Radial Nerve, Shoulder

The Anterior Approach for Transfer of Radial Nerve Triceps Fascicles to the Axillary Nerve

2019 ◽  
Vol 44 (4) ◽  
pp. 345.e1-345.e6 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrea S. Bauer ◽  
Remy V. Rabinovich ◽  
Peter M. Waters
Keyword(s):  
Radial Nerve ◽  
Anterior Approach ◽  
Axillary Nerve

scholarly journals Anterior humeral approach with nerve stimulator

2018 ◽  
Vol 26 (3) ◽  
pp. 230949901880300
Author(s):  
Murat Gulcek ◽  
Mehmet Gamli
Keyword(s):  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Nerve Injury ◽  
Radial Nerve ◽  
Anterior Approach ◽  
Screw Fixation ◽  
Plate Osteosynthesis ◽  
Minimally Invasive Plate Osteosynthesis ◽  
Nerve Stimulator ◽  
Invasive Approach ◽  
Radial Nerve Injury

Introduction: The prevalence of radial nerve injury during surgery is as high as the prevalence of radial nerve injury due to trauma. The aim of this study is to minimize the risk of iatrogenic injury of radial nerve. Materials and Methods: Fifty patients with middle or distal diaphysis fractures of humerus and 18 patients with pseudoarthrosis at the same localizations were treated with surgery. Plate-screw fixation was performed with anterior approach in 43 patients. Eleven patients had minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis, and 14 patients had intramedullary nailing. The localization of the radial nerve was determined with nerve stimulator at the area of dissection. Results: Iatrogenic radial nerve injury did not occur in patients treated with open reduction or minimally invasive approach. Discussion: Nerve stimulator may be a method that decreases radial nerve injury, an iatrogenic complication. This method may be used in anterior approach and minimally invasive procedures.

Basic Anatomy of Direct Anterior Approach for Mini-Invasive Hip Surgery

2017 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexandar Iliev ◽  
Georgi Kotov ◽  
Boycho Landzhov ◽  
Plamen Kinov ◽  
Paoleta Yordanova ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Anterior Approach ◽  
Direct Anterior Approach ◽  
Hip Surgery

scholarly journals Repair of Symptomatic Partial Gluteus Medius Tear During Total Hip Arthroplasty Through the Direct Anterior Approach

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. e575-e580
Author(s):  
David R. Maldonado ◽  
Samantha C. Diulus ◽  
Mitchell B. Meghpara ◽  
Rachel M. Glein ◽  
Hari K. Ankem ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Total Hip Arthroplasty ◽  
Hip Arthroplasty ◽  
Anterior Approach ◽  
Gluteus Medius ◽  
Direct Anterior Approach ◽  
Total Hip

scholarly journals A Clinicoradiological Assessment following Surgical Intervention in Patients of Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy: An Institutional Experience

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maneet Gill ◽  
Vikas Maheshwari ◽  
Arun Kumar Yadav ◽  
Rushikesh Gadhavi
Keyword(s):  
Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy ◽  
Anterior Approach ◽  
Posterior Approach ◽  
Surgical Intervention ◽  
Japanese Orthopaedic Association ◽  
Surgical Decompression ◽  
Functional Improvement ◽  
Male Predominance ◽  
Canal Diameter ◽  
Posterior Group

Abstract Introduction  To critically analyze the functional and radiological improvement in patients of cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM) who underwent surgical decompression by an anterior or posterior approach. Materials and Methods  A retrospective study was conducted in a tertiary-level Armed Forces Hospital from June 2015 to December 2019. Preoperative assessment included a thorough clinical examination and functional and radiological assessment. The surgical decompression was done by an anterior or a posterior approach with instrumented fusion. Anterior approach was taken for single or two-level involvement and posterior approach for three or more cervical levels. The pre and postoperative neurological outcome was assessed by Nurick and modified Japanese Orthopaedic Association (mJOA) score along with measurement of canal diameter and cross-sectional area. Results  A total of 120 patients of CSM who underwent surgical decompression were analyzed. Both the groups were comparable and had male predominance. A total of 59 patients underwent surgical decompression by an anterior approach and the remaining 61 patients by the posterior approach. Out of the 59 patients operated by the anterior approach, 30 (50.85%) underwent anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF); remaining 29 (49.15%) underwent anterior cervical corpectomy and fusion (ACCF). In the posterior group (n = 61), 26 (42.6%) patients underwent laminoplasty and the remaining 35 (57.4%) underwent laminectomy with or without instrument fusion. Sixteen patients out of these underwent lateral mass fixation and the remaining 19 underwent laminectomy. There was functional improvement (mJOA and Nurick grade) and radiological improvement in both subgroups, which were statistically significant (p < 0.0001). Conclusion  A prompt surgical intervention in moderate-to-severe cases of CSM either by the anterior or the posterior approach is essential for good outcome.

Radial Nerve Palsy: Nerve Transfer Versus Tendon Transfer to Restore Function

Hand ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 155894472098812
Author(s):  
J. Megan M. Patterson ◽  
Stephanie A. Russo ◽  
Madi El-Haj ◽  
Christine B. Novak ◽  
Susan E. Mackinnon
Keyword(s):  
Radial Nerve ◽  
Tendon Transfer ◽  
Nerve Palsy ◽  
Nerve Transfer ◽  
Pinch Strength ◽  
Radial Nerve Palsy ◽  
Nerve Injuries ◽  
Tendon Transfers ◽  
Nerve Transfers ◽  
Transfer Group

Background: Radial nerve injuries cause profound disability, and a variety of reconstruction options exist. This study aimed to compare outcomes of tendon transfers versus nerve transfers for the management of isolated radial nerve injuries. Methods: A retrospective chart review of 30 patients with isolated radial nerve injuries treated with tendon transfers and 16 patients managed with nerve transfers was performed. Fifteen of the 16 patients treated with nerve transfer had concomitant pronator teres to extensor carpi radialis brevis tendon transfer for wrist extension. Preoperative and postoperative strength data, Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) scores, and quality-of-life (QOL) scores were compared before and after surgery and compared between groups. Results: For the nerve transfer group, patients were significantly younger, time from injury to surgery was significantly shorter, and follow-up time was significantly longer. Both groups demonstrated significant improvements in grip and pinch strength after surgery. Postoperative grip strength was significantly higher in the nerve transfer group. Postoperative pinch strength did not differ between groups. Similarly, both groups showed an improvement in DASH and QOL scores after surgery with no significant differences between the 2 groups. Conclusions: The nerve transfer group demonstrated greater grip strength, but both groups had improved pain, function, and satisfaction postoperatively. Patients who present early and can tolerate longer time to functional recovery would be optimal candidates for nerve transfers. Both tendon transfers and nerve transfers are good options for patients with radial nerve palsy.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document