Pediatric Advanced Life Support Guidelines

Author(s):  
Santosh Soans ◽  
Arun MK
2016 ◽  
Vol 32 (8) ◽  
pp. 499-503 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jana Sperka ◽  
Sheila J. Hanson ◽  
Raymond G. Hoffmann ◽  
Mahua Dasgupta ◽  
Michael T. Meyer

Resuscitation ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 72 (3) ◽  
pp. 496-497 ◽  
Author(s):  
John H.J.M. Meertens ◽  
Wilma E. Monteban-Kooistra ◽  
Carla A. Veldhuis ◽  
Jack J.M. Ligtenberg ◽  
Jan G. Zijlstra ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 33 (5) ◽  
pp. 357-360 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sophie T Williams ◽  
Mark C Sykes ◽  
Phang Boon Lim ◽  
Justin D Salciccioli

Author(s):  
Tim Hundscheid ◽  
Jos Bruinenberg ◽  
Jeroen Dudink ◽  
Rogier de Jonge ◽  
Marije Hogeveen

AbstractIn this retrospective analysis, the Newborn Life Support (NLS) test scenario performance of participants of the Dutch Neonatal Advanced Life Support (NALS) course was assessed. Characteristics of participants and total amount of failures were collected. Failures were subdivided in (1) errors of omission; (2) errors of commission; and (3) unspecified if data was missing. Pearson’s chi-squared test was used to assess differences between participant groups. In total, 23 out of 86 participants (27%) failed their NLS test scenario. Life support course instructors in general (20/21) passed their test scenario more often compared to other participants (43/65) (p = 0.008). In total 110 fail items were recorded; the most common errors being not assessing heart rate (error of omission) (n = 47) and inadequate performance of airway management (error of commission) (n = 24).Conclusion: A substantial part of NALS participants failed their NLS test scenario. Errors of omission could be reduced by the availability of a checklist/NLS algorithm. Life support course instructors possibly make less errors of commission due to retention of skills by teaching these skills at least twice a year. Therefore, our study suggests that neonatal basic life support skills should be retained by local assurance of training programmes. What is Known:• Retention of skills after life support courses decreases after three months.• Adherence to newborn life support guidelines is suboptimal. What is New:• NLS performance is suboptimal in participants for advanced neonatal life support.• Most common failures are not assessing heart rate and inadequate airway management.


2021 ◽  
Vol 41 (6) ◽  
pp. 22-27
Author(s):  
Jaime Esbensen Doroba

Background Both the Neonatal Resuscitation Program and Pediatric Advanced Life Support guidelines can be used for infants requiring cardiopulmonary resuscitation outside the delivery room. Each set of guidelines has supporting algorithms for resuscitation; however, there are no current recommendations for transitioning older infants outside the delivery room. Objective To provide background information on the algorithms in the Neonatal Resuscitation Program and Pediatric Advanced Life Support guidelines and to discuss the role that nurses and advanced practice nurses play in advancing scientific research on resuscitation. Content Covered Summaries of both sets of guidelines, differences in practices, and recommendations for practice changes will be discussed. Discussion Provider preference and unit practice determine which guidelines are used for infants outside the delivery room. Providers in pediatric intensive care units and pediatric cardiac intensive care units often use the Pediatric Advanced Life Support guidelines, whereas providers in neonatal intensive care units use the Neonatal Resuscitation Program guidelines for infants of the same age. The variation in resuscitation practices for infants outside the delivery room can negatively affect resuscitation outcomes.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document