scholarly journals Performing newborn life support in advance of neonatal advanced life support course—back to basics?

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tim Hundscheid ◽  
Jos Bruinenberg ◽  
Jeroen Dudink ◽  
Rogier de Jonge ◽  
Marije Hogeveen
Keyword(s):  
Heart Rate ◽  
Airway Management ◽  
Life Support ◽  
Advanced Life Support ◽  
Substantial Part ◽  
Test Scenario ◽  
Chi Squared ◽  
Support Skills ◽  
Training Programmes ◽  
Support Guidelines

AbstractIn this retrospective analysis, the Newborn Life Support (NLS) test scenario performance of participants of the Dutch Neonatal Advanced Life Support (NALS) course was assessed. Characteristics of participants and total amount of failures were collected. Failures were subdivided in (1) errors of omission; (2) errors of commission; and (3) unspecified if data was missing. Pearson’s chi-squared test was used to assess differences between participant groups. In total, 23 out of 86 participants (27%) failed their NLS test scenario. Life support course instructors in general (20/21) passed their test scenario more often compared to other participants (43/65) (p = 0.008). In total 110 fail items were recorded; the most common errors being not assessing heart rate (error of omission) (n = 47) and inadequate performance of airway management (error of commission) (n = 24).Conclusion: A substantial part of NALS participants failed their NLS test scenario. Errors of omission could be reduced by the availability of a checklist/NLS algorithm. Life support course instructors possibly make less errors of commission due to retention of skills by teaching these skills at least twice a year. Therefore, our study suggests that neonatal basic life support skills should be retained by local assurance of training programmes. What is Known:• Retention of skills after life support courses decreases after three months.• Adherence to newborn life support guidelines is suboptimal. What is New:• NLS performance is suboptimal in participants for advanced neonatal life support.• Most common failures are not assessing heart rate and inadequate airway management.

The Effects of Pediatric Advanced Life Support Guidelines on Pediatric Trauma Airway Management

2016 ◽  
Vol 32 (8) ◽  
pp. 499-503 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jana Sperka ◽  
Sheila J. Hanson ◽  
Raymond G. Hoffmann ◽  
Mahua Dasgupta ◽  
Michael T. Meyer
Keyword(s):  
Airway Management ◽  
Life Support ◽  
Pediatric Trauma ◽  
Advanced Life Support ◽  
Support Guidelines

scholarly journals Sedation/Analgesia Administration Practice Varies according to Endoscopy Facility (Hospital- or Office-Based) Setting: Results from a Nationwide Survey in Greece

2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 ◽  
pp. 1-9
Author(s):  
Georgios Tziatzios ◽  
Dimitrios N. Samonakis ◽  
Theocharis Tsionis ◽  
Spyridon Goulas ◽  
Dimitrios Christodoulou ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Airway Management ◽  
Public Hospital ◽  
Private Hospital ◽  
Life Support ◽  
Advanced Life Support ◽  
Nationwide Survey ◽  
Web Based ◽  
The Public ◽  
Management Techniques ◽  
The Impact

Objectives. To examine the impact of endoscopy setting (hospital-based vs. office-based) on sedation/analgesia administration and to provide nationwide data on monitoring practices among Greek gastroenterologists in real-world settings. Material and Methods. A web-based survey regarding sedation/analgesia rates and monitoring practices during endoscopy either in a hospital-based or in an office-based setting was disseminated to the members of the Hellenic Society of Gastroenterology and Professional Association of Gastroenterologists. Participants were asked to complete a questionnaire, which consisted of 35 items, stratified into 4 sections: demographics, preprocedure (informed consent, initial patient evaluation), intraprocedure (monitoring practices, sedative agents’ administration rate), and postprocedure practices (recovery). Results. 211 individuals responded (response rate: 40.3%). Propofol use was significantly higher in the private hospital compared to the public hospital and the office-based setting for esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) (85.8% vs. 19.5% vs. 10.5%, p<0.0001) and colonoscopy (88.2% vs. 20.1% vs. 9.4%, p<0.0001). This effect was not detected for midazolam, pethidine, and fentanyl use. Endoscopists themselves administered the medications in most cases. However, a significant contribution of anesthesiology sedation/analgesia provision was detected in private hospitals (14.7% vs. 2.8% vs. 2.4%, p<0.001) compared to the other settings. Only 35.2% of the private offices have a separate recovery room, compared to 80.4% and 58.7% of the private hospital- and public hospital-based facilities, respectively, while the nursing personnel monitored patients’ recovery in most of the cases. Participants were familiar with airway management techniques (83.9% with bag valve mask and 23.2% with endotracheal intubation), while 49.7% and 21.8% had received Basic Life Support (BLS) and Advanced Life Support (ALS) training, respectively. Conclusion. The private hospital-based setting is associated with higher propofol sedation administration both for EGD and for colonoscopy. Greek endoscopists are adequately trained in airway management techniques.

scholarly journals CPR Compression Rotation Every One Minute Versus Two Minutes: A Randomized Cross-Over Manikin Study

2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 ◽  
pp. 1-6
Author(s):  
Nutthapong Pechaksorn ◽  
Veerapong Vattanavanit
Keyword(s):  
Heart Rate ◽  
Respiratory Rate ◽  
Chest Compression ◽  
Life Support ◽  
Chest Compressions ◽  
Compression Depth ◽  
End Points ◽  
The One ◽  
Support Guidelines

Background. The current basic life support guidelines recommend two-minute shifts for providing chest compressions when two rescuers are performing cardiopulmonary resuscitation. However, various studies have found that rescuer fatigue can occur within one minute, coupled with a decay in the quality of chest compressions. Our aim was to compare chest compression quality metrics and rescuer fatigue between alternating rescuers in performing one- and two-minute chest compressions. Methods. This prospective randomized cross-over study was conducted at Songklanagarind Hospital, Hat Yai, Songkhla, Thailand. We enrolled sixth-year medical students and residents and randomly grouped them into pairs to perform 8 minutes of chest compression, utilizing both the one-minute and two-minute scenarios on a manikin. The primary end points were chest compression depth and rate. The secondary end points included rescuers’ fatigue, respiratory rate, and heart rate. Results. One hundred four participants were recruited. Compared with participants in the two-minute group, participants in the one-minute group had significantly higher mean (standard deviation, SD) compression depth (mm) (45.8 (7.2) vs. 44.5 (7.1), P=0.01) but there was no difference in the mean (SD) rate (compressions per min) (116.1 (12.5) vs. 117.8 (12.4), P=0.08), respectively. The rescuers in the one-minute group had significantly less fatigue (P<0.001) and change in respiratory rate (P<0.001), but there was no difference in the change of heart rate (P=0.59) between the two groups. Conclusion. There were a significantly higher compression depth and lower rescuer fatigue in the 1-minute chest compression group compared with the 2-minute group. This trial is registered with TCTR20170823001.

Factors Influencing Successful Intubation in the Prehospital Setting

1995 ◽  
Vol 10 (4) ◽  
pp. 259-264 ◽  
Author(s):  
James V. Doran ◽  
Bartholomew J. Tortella ◽  
Walter J. Drivet ◽  
Robert F. Lavery
Keyword(s):  
Airway Management ◽  
Endotracheal Intubation ◽  
Life Support ◽  
Advanced Life Support ◽  
High Volume ◽  
Success Rates ◽  
Structured Interviews ◽  
Technical Problems ◽  
Patients Âgés ◽  
Prehospital Airway Management

AbstractObjective:To explore the determinants influencing oral/nasal endotracheal intubation (OETI/NETI) and determine which cognitive, therapeutic, and technical interventions may assist prehospital airway management.Design, Setting, and Participants:Prospective review of run reports and structured interviews of paramedics involved in OETI/NETI attempts were conducted in a high-volume, inner-city, advanced life support (ALS) system during an eight-month period (July 1991 to February 1992). Data were abstracted from run reports, and paramedics were asked in structured interviews to describe difficulties in OETI/NETI attempts.Results:Of 236 patients studied, 88% (208) were intubated successfully. Success/failure rate was not related statistically to patients' ages (p = 0. 78), medical or trauma complaint (89% vs 85%, p = 0.35), oral versus nasal route (88% vs 85%, p = 0.38), care time (scene + transport times: success, 18 minutes; failure, 20 minutes, p = 0.30), paramedic seniority (p = 0.13), or number of attempts per paramedic (p >0.05). Increased level of consciousness (LOC) was associated with decreased success rate (p = 0.04). Paramedics reported difficulties in endotracheal intubation (ETI) attempts in 110 (46.6%) of patients. Factors reported to increase ETI difficulty were: 1) technical problems (35.6%); 2) mechanical problems (15.6%); and 3) combative patients (12.7%).Conclusions:Oral endotracheal intubation and NETI success rates identified in this study are similar to those described in the literature, although innovative strategies could be used to facilitate prehospital airway management. Many of the factors found to increase ETI difficulty could be ameliorated by the administration of paralytic agents, that is, for combative patients. Focused training in cadaver and animal labs coupled with recurrence training in the operating suites should be used on a regular basis to decrease difficulties in visualization. Interventions directed at alleviating mechanical difficulties that should be explored include new-to-the-field techniques, such as retrograde intubation, fiber-optic technology, and surgical tracheal access.

Variability in the assessment of advanced life support skills

Resuscitation ◽  
2001 ◽  
Vol 50 (3) ◽  
pp. 281-286 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gavin D Perkins ◽  
Jonathan Hulme ◽  
Michael J Tweed
Keyword(s):  
Life Support ◽  
Advanced Life Support ◽  
Support Skills

Inconsistencies in new Advanced Life Support guidelines: The sequence of drug and shock delivery

Resuscitation ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 72 (3) ◽  
pp. 496-497 ◽  
Author(s):  
John H.J.M. Meertens ◽  
Wilma E. Monteban-Kooistra ◽  
Carla A. Veldhuis ◽  
Jack J.M. Ligtenberg ◽  
Jan G. Zijlstra ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Life Support ◽  
Advanced Life Support ◽  
Shock Delivery ◽  
Support Guidelines
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document