Scar Reduction: The Principles and The Options

2016 ◽  
pp. 177-177
Author(s):  
Dhepe Vishwanath
Keyword(s):  
2014 ◽  
Vol 17 (4) ◽  
pp. 224
Author(s):  
Yue-Dong Shi ◽  
Fa-Zhi Qi ◽  
Zi-Hao Feng

We report a bilateral reduction mammoplasty in a 15 year old female who suffered increasing back and shoulder pain and chest wall discomfort associated with bilateral breast enlargement during a 17 month period following heart transplantation. Cardiologic evaluation confirmed a structurally normal heart with good systolic and diastolic function, and ejection fraction of 80%. We performed a bilateral mammoplasty using dermal suspension flap in vertical-scar reduction. The patient recovered satisfactorily without incident, and breast morphology was excellent at the 2 year 9 month follow-up, with no recurrence of her previous symptoms or further hyperplasia.


1991 ◽  
Vol 88 (6) ◽  
pp. 1112 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Ronan Horta de Almeida

2017 ◽  
Vol 3 ◽  
pp. 205951311770216 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ciaran P O’Boyle ◽  
Holleh Shayan-Arani ◽  
Maha Wagdy Hamada

Introduction: Hypertrophic and keloid scarring remain notoriously troublesome for patients to tolerate and frustratingly difficult for clinicians to treat. Many different treatment modalities exist, signifying the failure of any method to achieve consistently excellent results. Intralesional cryotherapy is a relatively recent development that uses a double lumen needle, placed through the core of a keloid or hypertrophic scar, to deliver nitrogen vapour, which freezes the scar from its core, outwards. Methods: This article provides a comprehensive review of the literature on intralesional cryotherapy for hypertrophic scars and keloids. A systematic review or meta-analysis was not possible, since the existing articles did not permit this. Results: A search of English language, peer-reviewed literature was carried out. The evidence base was found to be low (level 4). In addition, much of the published evidence comes from a very few groups. Despite this, consistent findings from case series suggest that the technique is safe and achieves good scar reduction with very few treatments. Adverse effects include depigmentation, recurrence and pain. Pain and recurrence appear to be uncommon and depigmentation may be temporary. Discussion: Well-constructed, prospectively recruited comparative trials are absent from the literature. These are strongly encouraged, in order to strengthen general confidence in this technique and in the repeatability of outcomes reported thus far.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document