scholarly journals Is Neoadjuvant Therapy Needed in Patients with Resectable Pancreatic Cancer?

Gut and Liver ◽  
2022 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
pp. 3-4
Author(s):  
Dong Uk Kim
2021 ◽  
Vol Publish Ahead of Print ◽  
Author(s):  
Dominique L. Birrer ◽  
Henriette Golcher ◽  
Riccardo Casadei ◽  
Sarah R. Haile ◽  
Ralph Fritsch ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Francis Igor Macedo ◽  
Danny Yakoub ◽  
Vikas Dudeja ◽  
Nipun B. Merchant

The incidence of pancreatic cancer continues to rise, and it is now the third-leading cause of cancer-related deaths in the United States. Only 15 to 20% of patients are eligible to undergo potentially curative resection, as most tumors are deemed unresectable at the time of diagnosis because of either locally advanced disease or distant metastases. Improvements in preoperative CT imaging have enabled better determination of the extent of disease and allowed for better operative planning. Based on their relationship to the surrounding vasculature and structures and presence or absence of distant disease, pancreatic tumors are classified into four categories: resectable, borderline resectable pancreatic cancer (BRPC), locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC), and metastatic. With the recent advent of more effective chemotherapy regimens, efforts have focused on using neoadjuvant therapy approaches to increase the likelihood of achieving an R0 in patients with BRPC and possibly convert unresectable, locally advanced tumors to potentially resectable tumors. Response with neoadjuvant therapy regimens has resulted in increased number of patients eligible for resection, many times requiring vascular resection. Herein, we describe recent changes in the classification, important surgical and pathologic considerations and updated multimodal therapeutic options in the complex management of BRPC and LAPC.  This review contains 5 figures, 2 tables, and 78 references. Key Words: borderline resectable pancreatic cancer, CA 19-9, FOLFIRINOX, locally advanced pancreatic cancer, nab-paclitaxel, neoadjuvant chemotherapy, pancreatectomy, portal vein resection, radiation therapy, gemcitabine


2019 ◽  
Vol 18 (4) ◽  
pp. 373-378 ◽  
Author(s):  
June S Peng ◽  
Jane Wey ◽  
Sricharan Chalikonda ◽  
Daniela S Allende ◽  
R Matthew Walsh ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Yoon Suk Lee ◽  
Jong-Chan Lee ◽  
Se Yeol Yang ◽  
Jaihwan Kim ◽  
Jin-Hyeok Hwang

Abstract The effectiveness of neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) remains unclear in resectable pancreatic cancer (PC) as compared with upfront surgery (US). The aim of this study was to investigate the survival gain of NAT over US in resectable PC. PubMed and EMBASE were searched for studies comparing survival outcomes between NAT and US for resectable PC until June 2018. Overall survival (OS) was analyzed according to treatment strategy (NAT versus US) and analytic methods (intention-to-treat analysis (ITT) and per-protocol analysis (PP)). In 14 studies, 2,699 and 6,992 patients were treated with NAT and US, respectively. Although PP analysis showed the survival gain of NAT (HR 0.72, 95% CI 0.68–0.76), ITT analysis did not show the statistical significance (HR 0.96, 95% CI 0.82–1.12). However, NAT completed with subsequent surgery showed better survival over US completed with adjuvant therapy (HR 0.82, 95% CI 0.71–0.93). In conclusion, the supporting evidence for NAT in resectable PC was insufficient because the benefit was not demonstrated in ITT analysis. However, among the patients who completed both surgery and chemotherapy, NAT showed survival benefit over adjuvant therapy. Therefore, NAT could have a role of triaging the patients for surgery even in resectable PC.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document