The sublime and the beautiful: Bringing Murdoch and Gerard Manley Hopkins into conversation

Tekstualia ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 1 (5) ◽  
pp. 123-134
Author(s):  
Jeremy Scott Ecke

Ranging from the Transcendental and Romantic writing of the nineteenth century through the experimental verse of Gerard Manley Hopkins and the iconic depictions of westward expansion in the landscape painting of Thomas Cole (and the Hudson River School), to the rural poetics of Robert Frost, this article argues that poets, like painters, must not merely sketch or describe the sublime or transcendental nature of a scene; they must capture its visual and emotional impact, and – through some artistic device – reenact its transcendence to move the reader or observer from place to presence.


2012 ◽  
Author(s):  
Henry J. M. Day
Keyword(s):  

Author(s):  
John Llewelyn

The Early Mediaeval Scottish philosopher and theologian John Duns Scotus shook traditional doctrines of logical universality and logical particularity by arguing for a metaphysics of ‘formal distinction’. Why did the Nineteenth Century poet and self-styled philosopher Gerard Manley Hopkins find this revolutionary teaching so appealing? John Llewelyn answers this question by casting light on various neologisms introduced by Hopkins and reveals how Hopkins endorses Scotus’s claim that being and existence are grounded in doing and willing. Drawing on modern respon ses to Scotus made by Heidegger, Peirce, Arendt, Leibniz, Hume, Reid, Derrida and Deleuze, Llewelyn’s own response shows by way of bonus why it would be a pity to suppose that the rewards of reading Scotus and Hopkins are available only to those who share their theological presuppositions


Author(s):  
Robert Pfaller

Starting from a passage from Slavoj Žižek`s brilliant book The Sublime Object of Ideology, the very passage on canned laughter that gave such precious support for the development of the theory of interpassivity, this chapter examines a question that has proved indispensable for the study of interpassivity: namely, what does it mean for a theory to proceed by examples? What is the specific role of the example in certain example-friendly theories, for example in Žižek’s philosophy?


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document