Interpassivity and Misdemeanours: The Art of Thinking in Examples and the Žižekian Toolbox

Author(s):  
Robert Pfaller

Starting from a passage from Slavoj Žižek`s brilliant book The Sublime Object of Ideology, the very passage on canned laughter that gave such precious support for the development of the theory of interpassivity, this chapter examines a question that has proved indispensable for the study of interpassivity: namely, what does it mean for a theory to proceed by examples? What is the specific role of the example in certain example-friendly theories, for example in Žižek’s philosophy?

2020 ◽  
Vol 33 (3-4) ◽  
pp. 63-76
Author(s):  
Kate Moffat

Kiehumispiste (Hirvonen, 2017) tarkastelee maahanmuuton aiheuttamaa jyrkkenevää polarisaatiota suomalaisessa yhteiskunnassa. Elokuvassa kohtaavat kansalliset, poliittiset ja globaalit teemat, joita lähestytään identiteettipolitiikan tarjoaman prisman läpi. Kiehumispiste asettuu osaksi suomalaisen dokumenttielokuvan trendiä, jossa tunteet nostetaan poliittista kontekstia, tosiasioita tai analyysiä keskeisemmiksi. Hirvosen mukaan yhteiskunnan jakaantumista käsiteltäessä ei ylipäätään pidä tavoitella konsensusta, vaan keskeisenä tavoitteena tulisi olla dialogi. Kyseenalaistan artikkelissani elokuvan lähestymistavan hyödyntämällä analyysissäni Susanna Helken teoriaa suomalaisen dokumenttielokuvan emotiivisesta käänteestä sekä Slavoj Žižekin teoriaa politiikan kulturalisaatiosta. Esitän, että valitessaan dialogisen lähestymistavan Kiehumispiste korostaa tunteiden ja yksilöllisen valinnan roolia. Tämä näkökulma ei kuitenkaan huomioi niitä laajempia poliittisia ja taloudellisia rakenteita, jotka vaikuttavat ihmisten valintoihin.   Politics of individuality in Elina Hirvonen’s documentary film Boiling Point   Boiling Point (Hirvonen, 2017) explores a Finnish society that is increasingly polarised by immigration. The film is a meeting of national, political and globally relevant themes but they are explored through the prism of identity politics. The results are a documentary that speaks to the emerging ‘emotive’ trends in Finnish documentary film culture. Hirvonen’s diagnosis is that consensus should not be the overall objective when tackling social division. Rather, dialogue should occupy the fundamental role. However, I challenge the documentary’s approach by drawing on the work of Susanna Helke and Slavoj Žižek and their respective theories on the emotive turn in Finnish documentary film culture and the culturalization of politics. I claim that Kiehumispiste emphasises the role of emotion and personal choice when engaging in this dialogue. However, this approach does not account for the role of wider political and economic structures in influencing people’s choices.


2016 ◽  
Vol 24 (2) ◽  
pp. 205-227 ◽  
Author(s):  
Giorgio Cesarale

InLess Than Nothing: Hegel and the Shadow of Dialectical Materialism, Slavoj Žižek presents the results of his long meditation on the meaning and ultimate implications of Hegelian philosophy. In this review-article, I will first examine the stages of Žižek’s transformation of Hegelianism, and then analyse the main themes brought up inLess than Nothing. The development of a ‘polemological’ interpretation of the Hegelian concepts of ‘reconciliation’ and ‘absolute’ leads Žižek to emphasise the role of negativity and antagonism in the process of constitution of reality and subject as part of reality itself. This implies a reinterpretation of dialectical materialism: reality is not something that simply precedes the subject, but which contains just multiplicities of multiplicities, and thus the Void itself. Žižek’s assertion that the ultimate reality is the Void itself then renders unavoidable the critique of Hegelian Marxism based on the centrality of the category of alienation. The last part of the review-article surveys, instead, how Žižek’s re-reading of Hegel affects his relation with Marx and also examines the role played by ‘contradiction’ in his theoretical proposal.


2011 ◽  
Vol 19 (3) ◽  
pp. 157-175 ◽  
Author(s):  
Evan Calder Williams

AbstractThis review looks back at Lenin Reloaded: Towards a Politics of Truth, the 2007 collection of essays from Slavoj Žižek, Alain Badiou, Fredric Jameson, Sylvain Lazarus, Terry Eagleton, and others. Taking up the volume’s central questions, it moves through the problems posed explicitly and implicitly by an attempt to think the figure and politics of Lenin today. In so doing, the review takes on the Leninist conception of history and revolution, the position of dialectics as description and as method, the rôle of the partisan, the debate about voluntarism, and the status of the party as historical and contemporary form.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document