scholarly journals Measuring Statistical Capacity Building: A Logical Framework Approach

2001 ◽  
Vol 01 (188) ◽  
pp. 1
Author(s):  
Thomas K. Morrison ◽  
Sarmad Khawaja ◽  
◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 998-999 ◽  
pp. 1642-1648
Author(s):  
Chun Mei Wang ◽  
Bao Feng Chen

Research achievements of the ASTP Policy-Oriented cannot generate directly economic benefit, social benefit and ecological benefit. It would realize benefit of ASTP only if the outputs can be transformed practical productive forces. In this paper, the mechanism and pathway of achieving benefit of ASTP is analyzed deeply based on the logical framework model. Then the empirical studies shows that the inputs (research investment) have positive correlation with outputs (research achievement), extension and outcomes (changes in productivity). Although the inputs have a certain influence to agricultural economics, it mainly affects indirectly agricultural development by research achievements and extension. Therefore, the benefits of ASTP should not be evaluated according by inputs/outputs methods. We must analyze and assess the anticipated chain of cause/effect relationships of ASTP based on the program “theory-driven” approach. It can promote agricultural research and extension projects to integrated closely, at the same time the benefit of ASTP can be improved greatly.


2019 ◽  
Vol 19 (2) ◽  
pp. 112-122
Author(s):  
Lisa Ringhofer ◽  
Karin Kohlweg

This article critically reflects on two development programme planning methodologies: the dominant Logical Framework Approach (LFA) and the Theory of Change (ToC). It reviews their conceptual origins and outlines their commonalities, differences and challenges in day-to-day development practice. The article claims that while both approaches originate from the same family of programme theory, the LFA has over the years somehow lost its analytic lens to capture social change and become more of a donor-driven performance management tool. The ToC has restored some of these analytical and engagement aspects that the LFA approach was originally designed to elicit, but some of the practical challenges remain. The authors argue for a combined use of both methodologies, if held lightly and approached from a learning and not a compliance perspective.


2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (4) ◽  
pp. 1017-1029
Author(s):  
Harmony K. Musiyarira ◽  
Mallikarjun Pillalamarry ◽  
Ditend Tesh ◽  
Namate Nikowa

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document