Acute impact of blood flow restriction on strength-endurance performance during the bench press exercise

Author(s):  
Mariola Gepfert ◽  
Jakub Jarosz ◽  
Grzegorz Wojdala ◽  
Michal Krzysztofik ◽  
Yuri Campos ◽  
...  
2019 ◽  
Vol 119 (10) ◽  
pp. 2177-2183
Author(s):  
Yu Lun Tai ◽  
Erica M. Marshall ◽  
Alaina Glasgow ◽  
Jason C. Parks ◽  
Leslie Sensibello ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Magdalena Rawska ◽  
Mariola Gepfert ◽  
Aleksandra Mostowik ◽  
Michal Krzysztofik ◽  
Grzegorz Wojdala ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michal Wilk ◽  
Mariola Gepfert ◽  
Michal Krzysztofik ◽  
Petr Stastny ◽  
Adam Zajac ◽  
...  

This study evaluated the effects of continuous and intermittent blood flow restriction (BFR) with 70% of full arterial occlusion pressure on bar velocity during the bench press exercise against a wide range of resistive loads. Eleven strength-trained males (age: 23.5 ± 1.4 years; resistance training experience: 2.8 ± 0.8 years, maximal bench press strength – 1RM = 101.8 ± 13.9 kg; body mass = 79.8 ± 10.4 kg), performed three different testing protocols in random and counterbalanced order: without BFR (NO-BFR); intermittent BFR (I-BFR) and continuous BFR (C-BFR). During each experimental session, subjects performed eight sets of two repetitions each, with increasing loads from 20 to 90% 1RM (10% steps), and 3 min rest between each set. In the C-BFR condition occlusion was kept throughout the trial, while in the I-BFR, occlusion was released during each 3 min rest interval. Peak bar velocity (PV) during the bench press exercise was higher by 12–17% in both I-BFR and C-BFR compared with NO-BFR only at the loads of 20, 30, 40, and 50% 1RM (p < 0.001), while performance at higher loads remained unchanged. Mean bar velocity (MV) was unaffected by occlusion (p = 0.342). These results indicate that BFR during bench press exercise increases PV and this may be used as an enhanced stimulus during explosive resistance training. At higher workloads, bench press performance was not negatively affected by BFR, indicating that the benefits of exercise under occlusion can be obtained while explosive performance is not impaired.


2020 ◽  
Vol Publish Ahead of Print ◽  
Author(s):  
Michal Wilk ◽  
Michal Krzysztofik ◽  
Aleksandra Filip ◽  
Adam Zajac ◽  
Gregory C. Bogdanis ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Michal Wilk ◽  
Michal Krzysztofik ◽  
Aleksandra Filip ◽  
Agnieszka Szkudlarek ◽  
Robert G. Lockie ◽  
...  

Background: The aim of the present study was to evaluate the effects of post-activation performance enhancement (PAPE) during successive sets of the bench press (BP) exercise under blood flow restriction (BFR). Methods: The study included 10 strength-trained males (age = 29.8 ± 4.6 years; body mass = 94.3 ± 3.6 kg; BP 1-repetition maximum (1RM) = 168.5 ± 26.4 kg). The experiment was performed following a randomized crossover design, where each participant performed two different exercise protocols: under blood flow restriction (BFR) and control test protocol (CONT) without blood flow restriction. During the experimental sessions, the study participants performed 3 sets of 3 repetitions of the BP exercise at 70%1RM with a 5 min rest interval between sets. The differences in peak power output (PP), mean power output (MP), peak bar velocity (PV), and mean bar velocity (MV) between the CONT and BFR conditions were examined using 2-way (condition × set) repeated measures ANOVA. Furthermore, t-test comparisons between conditions were made for the set 2–set 1, set 3–set 1, and set 3–set 2 delta values for all variables. Results: The post hoc results for condition × set interaction in PP showed a significant increase in set 2 compared to set 1 for BFR (p < 0.01) and CONT (p = 0.01) conditions, a significant increase in set 3 compared to set 1 for the CONT (p = 0.01) condition, as well as a significant decrease in set 3 compared to set 1 for BFR condition occurred (p < 0.01). The post hoc results for condition × set interaction in PV showed a significant increase in set 2 compared to set 1 for BFR (p < 0.01) and CONT (p = 0.01) conditions, a significant increase in set 3 compared to set 1 for CONT (p = 0.03) condition, as well as a significant decrease in set 3 compared to set 1 for BFR condition (p < 0.01). The t-test comparisons showed significant differences in PP (p < 0.01) and PV (p = 0.01) for set 3–set 2 delta values between BFR and CONT conditions. Conclusion: The PAPE effect was analyzed through changes in power output and bar velocity that occurred under both the CONT and BFR conditions. However, the effects of PAPE have different kinetics in successive sets for BFR and for CONT conditions.


2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Davidson Costa Soares ◽  
Paulo Eduardo Pereira ◽  
Matheus Guidugli de Oliveira ◽  
Paulo Azevedo

Resistance exercise with blood flow restriction (BFR) promote several benefits, among them the cardiovascular effects, as the hypotensive effect. The objective of this study is to test whether the intensity and volume of BRF modulate the magnitude of the post-exercise hypotensive response. Fourteen young men performed three RBF protocols: BRF50% (50% of 1RM, 4 sets until concentric failure), BRF30% (30% of 1RM, 4 sets until concentric failure), and BRF50%eq (50% of 1RM with equalised volume, 4 sets with the repetitions determined by equalisation). The exercises performed in the three protocols were the bench press and pulley. We calculated the total work. Over 60 minutes after exercise, we measured systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP) and mean arterial pressure (MAP). Neither the intensity nor the BFR volume influenced the magnitude of the hypotensive response. Thus, the results of the present study show that there is no need to use high training loads when the goal is to promote post-exercise hypotension or to maintain blood flow restriction for long periods.


2017 ◽  
Vol 49 (5S) ◽  
pp. 53
Author(s):  
Koji Kurita ◽  
Masanori Takemura ◽  
Mitusharu Kaya ◽  
Junzo Tsuijita ◽  
Yuichiro Katoh

2017 ◽  
Vol 49 (5S) ◽  
pp. 254
Author(s):  
Olivia Gilmour ◽  
Alaina Glasgow ◽  
Erica Marshall ◽  
Yu Lun Tai ◽  
J. Derek Kingsley

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document