scholarly journals Renal function after nephron-sparing surgery for renal tumors

Author(s):  
Roman Sosnowski ◽  
Małgorzata Benke ◽  
Tomasz Demkow ◽  
Marcin Ligaj ◽  
Wojciech Michalski
2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 ◽  
pp. 1-8
Author(s):  
Yao Song ◽  
Songqiang Pang ◽  
Jinqiang Yang ◽  
Sen Li ◽  
Yaqiang He ◽  
...  

Objective. To explore the situation of 61 patients with renal tumors who underwent retroperitoneal laparoscopic nephron-sparing surgery (RLNSS) and the factors affecting postoperative renal function. Methods. A total of 61 patients with renal tumors who underwent RLNSS in our hospital from January 2018 to January 2021 were included in this study. All patients were treated with RLNSS. The clinical data of patients were recorded. Before operation and 3 months after operation, the change value of glomerular filtration rate (ΔGFR) was measured by the Gates method. Multivariate linear regression was used to analyze the related factors affecting postoperative renal function. Results. All 61 patients successfully completed the operation. The mean operative time was 60–150 min‚ average (98.75 ± 14.38) min. The estimated intraoperative blood loss was 20–310 ml‚ average (107.93 ± 68.55) ml. Intraoperative warm ischemia time (WIT) was 0–39 min, with an average of (21.16 ± 6.47) min. All patients’ pathological margins were negative after operation. In all patients, there were 5 postoperative complications, including 2 cases of renal wound bleeding (3.28%), 1 case of hematuria (1.64%), 1 case of urinary fistula (1.64%), and 1 case of subcutaneous emphysema (1.64%). There were significant differences in tumor diameter, preoperative GFR, operation time and WIT ( P < 0.05 ). Multivariate analysis showed that tumor diameter, preoperative GFR, and WIT were all factors affecting the postoperative renal function of patients with RLNSS ( P < 0.05 ). Conclusion. RLNSS has a good curative effect on patients with renal tumor, and tumor diameter, preoperative GFR, and WIT were all factors affecting the postoperative renal function of patients with RLNSS.


2005 ◽  
Vol 174 (4 Part 1) ◽  
pp. 1404-1408 ◽  
Author(s):  
FRANCESCO COZZI ◽  
AMALIA SCHIAVETTI ◽  
FRANCESCO MORINI ◽  
AUGUSTO ZANI ◽  
MARCO GAMBINO ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 36 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Imran Khan Jalbani ◽  
Syed Mohammad Nazim ◽  
Maria Ahmed ◽  
Farhat Abbas

Background and Objective: Open partial nephrectomy (PN) is still considered gold standard procedure for T1 localized renal tumors. Conventional technique involves clamping of the renal artery with or without vein however, renal ischemia produces a certain level of damage to the kidneys. This study aims to investigate potential effect of off-clamp vs. hilar clamping PN on renal function. Methods: This is a retrospective cohort study of patients who underwent unilateral, open partial nephrectomy for renal tumors b/w January 2009 December 2016 at our institution. A total of 90 partial nephrectomies were performed of which 65 cases were eligible for analysis. Non clamping technique was used in 43 while clamp was applied in 22 patients. Variables studied were patients’ demographics, clinical variables, the laterality, tumors size and location, R.E.N.A.L nephrometry score, blood loss, tumor histology and surgical margins. Patients’ renal function (serum creatinine and eGFR) were determined pre-operatively, at 3 and 12 months follow up. Data was analyzed on SPSS v. 22. Results: Both the groups were comparable with regards to pre-operative renal function. Mean radiological size of tumor was 4.71±1.31 and 3.81±1.0 (0.003) in two groups respectively. Mean R.E.N.A.L nephrometry score was 6.1±1.5 in off-clamp group compared to 7.05±1.7 in clamp group (p=0.04). No statistically significant difference was found in operative duration, blood loss, positive surgical margins and intra/ peri-operative complications. At three months and one year, renal function was better preserved in non-clamp group compared to clamp group (p=0.001 and 0.007 respectively). Conclusion: Off clamp open partial nephrectomy is safe and feasible option leading to less decline in renal function. doi: https://doi.org/10.12669/pjms.36.3.1533 How to cite this:Jalbani IK, Nazim SM, Ahmed M, Abbas F. Nephron sparing surgery for renal tumors- comparison of off-clamp partial nephrectomy with hilar clamping. Pak J Med Sci. 2020;36(3):---------. doi: https://doi.org/10.12669/pjms.36.3.1533 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.


2008 ◽  
Vol 179 (4S) ◽  
pp. 327-327
Author(s):  
Yasuhito Funahashi ◽  
Ryohei Hattori ◽  
Osamu Kamihira ◽  
Tokunori Yamamoto ◽  
Momokazu Gotoh

2008 ◽  
pp. 341-344
Author(s):  
Sascha Pahernik ◽  
Joachim W. Thüroff

2005 ◽  
Vol 173 (4S) ◽  
pp. 294-294 ◽  
Author(s):  
Igor Frank ◽  
Jose R. Colombo ◽  
Mauricio Rubenstein ◽  
Jihad H. Kaouk ◽  
Inderbir S. Gill

2010 ◽  
Vol 29 (3) ◽  
pp. 343-348 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel J. Lee ◽  
Greg Hruby ◽  
Mitchell C. Benson ◽  
James M. McKiernan

2017 ◽  
Vol 49 (4) ◽  
pp. 615-621 ◽  
Author(s):  
Renato Corradi ◽  
Aashish Kabra ◽  
Melissa Suarez ◽  
Jacob Oppenheimer ◽  
Zhamshid Okhunov ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document