scholarly journals Nephron sparing surgery for renal tumors-comparison of off-clamp partial nephrectomy with hilar clamping

2020 ◽  
Vol 36 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Imran Khan Jalbani ◽  
Syed Mohammad Nazim ◽  
Maria Ahmed ◽  
Farhat Abbas
Keyword(s):  
Renal Function ◽  
Blood Loss ◽  
Partial Nephrectomy ◽  
Nephron Sparing Surgery ◽  
Surgical Margins ◽  
Renal Tumors ◽  
Open Partial Nephrectomy ◽  
Nephrometry Score ◽  
Nephron Sparing ◽  
Significant Difference

Background and Objective: Open partial nephrectomy (PN) is still considered gold standard procedure for T1 localized renal tumors. Conventional technique involves clamping of the renal artery with or without vein however, renal ischemia produces a certain level of damage to the kidneys. This study aims to investigate potential effect of off-clamp vs. hilar clamping PN on renal function. Methods: This is a retrospective cohort study of patients who underwent unilateral, open partial nephrectomy for renal tumors b/w January 2009 December 2016 at our institution. A total of 90 partial nephrectomies were performed of which 65 cases were eligible for analysis. Non clamping technique was used in 43 while clamp was applied in 22 patients. Variables studied were patients’ demographics, clinical variables, the laterality, tumors size and location, R.E.N.A.L nephrometry score, blood loss, tumor histology and surgical margins. Patients’ renal function (serum creatinine and eGFR) were determined pre-operatively, at 3 and 12 months follow up. Data was analyzed on SPSS v. 22. Results: Both the groups were comparable with regards to pre-operative renal function. Mean radiological size of tumor was 4.71±1.31 and 3.81±1.0 (0.003) in two groups respectively. Mean R.E.N.A.L nephrometry score was 6.1±1.5 in off-clamp group compared to 7.05±1.7 in clamp group (p=0.04). No statistically significant difference was found in operative duration, blood loss, positive surgical margins and intra/ peri-operative complications. At three months and one year, renal function was better preserved in non-clamp group compared to clamp group (p=0.001 and 0.007 respectively). Conclusion: Off clamp open partial nephrectomy is safe and feasible option leading to less decline in renal function. doi: https://doi.org/10.12669/pjms.36.3.1533 How to cite this:Jalbani IK, Nazim SM, Ahmed M, Abbas F. Nephron sparing surgery for renal tumors- comparison of off-clamp partial nephrectomy with hilar clamping. Pak J Med Sci. 2020;36(3):---------. doi: https://doi.org/10.12669/pjms.36.3.1533 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Laparoscopic versus open partial nephrectomy for the management of highly complex renal tumors with PADUA score ⩾10: A single center analysis.

2021 ◽  
pp. 039156032110016
Author(s):  
Francesco Chiancone ◽  
Marco Fabiano ◽  
Clemente Meccariello ◽  
Maurizio Fedelini ◽  
Francesco Persico ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Partial Nephrectomy ◽  
Operation Time ◽  
Renal Tumors ◽  
Open Partial Nephrectomy ◽  
Estimated Blood Loss ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Operative Complications ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B ◽  
Post Operative Complications

Introduction: The aim of this study was to compare laparoscopic and open partial nephrectomy (PN) for renal tumors of high surgical complexity (PADUA score ⩾10). Methods: We retrospectively evaluated 93 consecutive patients who underwent PN at our department from January 2015 to September 2019. 21 patients underwent open partial nephrectomy (OPN) (Group A) and 72 underwent laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (LPN) (Group B). All OPNs were performed with a retroperitoneal approach, while all LPNs were performed with a transperitoneal approach by a single surgical team. Post-operative complications were classified according to the Clavien-Dindo system. Results: The two groups showed no difference in terms of patients’ demographics as well as tumor characteristics in all variables. Group A was found to be similar to group B in terms of operation time ( p = 0.781), conversion to radical nephrectomy ( p = 0.3485), and positive surgical margins ( p = 0.338) while estimated blood loss ( p = 0.0205), intra-operative ( p = 0.0104), and post-operative ( p = 0.0081) transfusion rates, drainage time ( p = 0.0012), pain score at post-operative day 1 (<0.0001) were significantly lower in Group B. The rate of enucleation and enucleoresection/polar resection was similar ( p = 0.1821) among the groups. Logistic regression analysis indicated that preoperative factors were not independently associated with the surgical approach. There was a statistically significant difference in complication rate (<0.0001) between the two groups even if no significant difference in terms of grade ⩾3 post-operative complications ( p = 0.3382) was detected. Discussion: LPN represents a feasible and safe approach for high complex renal tumors if performed in highly experienced laparoscopic centers. This procedure offers good intraoperative outcomes and a low rate of post-operative complications.

scholarly journals Association between R.E.N.A.L nephrometry score and perioperative outcomes following open partial nephrectomy under cold ischemia

2014 ◽  
Vol 8 (3-4) ◽  
pp. 137
Author(s):  
Dong Soo Park ◽  
Jin Ho Hwang ◽  
Moon Hyung Kang ◽  
Jong Jin Oh
Keyword(s):  
Blood Loss ◽  
Partial Nephrectomy ◽  
Perioperative Outcomes ◽  
Renal Neoplasm ◽  
Cold Ischemia ◽  
Ischemic Time ◽  
Open Partial Nephrectomy ◽  
Cold Ischemic Time ◽  
Nephrometry Score ◽  
Estimated Blood Loss

Introduction: We investigate the clinical significance of the R.E.N.A.L. nephrometry score for renal neoplasm following open partial nephrectomy (PN) under cold ischemia.Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted using clinical data of 98 consecutive patients with clear cell renal cell carcinoma who underwent open PN by a single surgeon from December 2000 to September 2012. Tumour complexity was stratified into 3 categories: low (4-6), moderate (7-9) and high (10-12) complexity. Perioperative outcomes, such as complications, cold ischemic time, estimated blood loss and renal function, were analyzed according to the complexity by NS. Complications were stratified using the Clavien-Dindo classification system.Results: Tumour complexity according to nephrometry score was assessed as low in 16 (16.3%), moderate in 48 (49.0%) and high in 34 (34.7%). The median cold ischemic time did not differ significantly among the 3 groups (36.0 minutes in low-, 40 minutes in moderate- and 43 minutes in the high-complexity group, p = 0.421). Total complications did not differ significantly (2 (2.0%) in low, 4 (4.1%) in moderate and 4 (4.1%) in high, p = 0.984). Each Grade 3 complication occurred in the moderate (urine leakage) and high groups (lymphocele). Postoperative renal functional outcomes were similar among the groups (p = 0.729). Only mean estimated blood loss was significantly different with nephrometry score (p = 0.049).Conclusions: The nephrometry score, as used in an open PN series under cold ischemia, was not significantly associated with perioperative outcomes (i.e., ischemia time, complications, renal functional preservation).

scholarly journals Pringle maneuver during open partial nephrectomy for renal tumors

2017 ◽  
Vol 12 (3) ◽  
pp. 136-140
Author(s):  
Adrian HASEGAN ◽  
◽  
Dan BRATU ◽  
Valentin PIRVUT ◽  
Ionela MIHAI ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Blood Loss ◽  
Partial Nephrectomy ◽  
Kidney Tissue ◽  
Operation Time ◽  
Good Control ◽  
Pringle Maneuver ◽  
Renal Tumors ◽  
Open Partial Nephrectomy ◽  
Renal Pedicle ◽  
Tumor Pathology

Introduction. Sparing kidney tissue is important because studies show that patients who have their entire kidney removed are more likely to suffer from chronic kidney disease after surgery than patients who received a kidney-sparing partial nephrectomy. The aim of study is to show the effectives of Pringle maneuver for clamping renal pedicle in order to minimize warm ischemia during open partial nephrectomy. Material and method. We retrospectively analyzed 34 patients diagnosed with cT1 renal tumors between 2012 and 2016 and underwent open partial nephrectomy in Sibiu Urology Department. During the surgery we perform clamping of renal pedicle with Satinsky clamp or with the Pringle maneuver. We analyzed the flowing parameters: operation time, blood loss, clamping time and serum creatinine before and after the surgery. Results. The mean age of patient with partial nephrectomy was 58.7±14.7 years, with 56.7±12.4 years for Satinsky group and 60.5±11.6 for Pringle group. The average duration for partial nephrectomy was 94.8±19.4 minutes. Average blood loss for all surgeries was 220±30 ml. Conclusion. Pringle maneuver is a safe and effective method with low intra and postoperative complications during open partial nephrectomy, having a good control of the renal pedical with reduced ischemia. Is a feasible method of choice in renal tumour tumor pathology on a single congenital or surgical kidney, mediorenal tumors or near the sinus and multifocal tumors.

scholarly journals Polyethylene glycol-coated collagen patch (hemopatch®) in open partial nephrectomy

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael Staehler ◽  
S. Rodler ◽  
M. Schott ◽  
J. Casuscelli ◽  
C. Stief ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Renal Function ◽  
Polyethylene Glycol ◽  
Blood Loss ◽  
Partial Nephrectomy ◽  
Low Complexity ◽  
High Complexity ◽  
Open Partial Nephrectomy ◽  
Duration Of Surgery ◽  
Coated Collagen

Abstract Purpose To describe the results of a polyethylene glycol-coated collagen patch, Hemopatch® on blood loss, surgical time and renal function in partial nephrectomy (PN) for renal cell carcinoma (RCC). Methods Out of a single surgeon cohort of n = 565 patients undergoing conventional open PN (CPN) between 01/2015 and 12/2017 at the University of Munich a consecutive subgroup (n = 42) was operated on using a polyethylene glycol-coated collagen-based sealant Hemopatch® (Baxter International Inc., Deerfield, IL, USA) (HPN). Results Median age was 65.2 years (range 12.7–95.2) with median follow-up of 9.43 months (0.03–49.15). Baseline renal function (CKD-EPI) was 78.56 ml/min/1.73 m2 (range 20.38–143.09) with a non-significant decline to 74.78 ml/min/1.73 m2 (range 3.75–167.74) at follow-up. In CPN 46% had low complexity, 33% moderate complexity and 20% high complexity lesions with 33% low, 40% moderate and 27% high complexity masses in HPN. Median tumor size was 4.3 cm (range 1–38 cm) in CPN with 4.8 cm (range 3.8–18.3 cm) with HPN, p = 0.293. Median blood loss and duration of surgery was significantly lower in the HPN group vs. CPN (146 ml ± 195 vs. 114 ml ± 159 ml; p = 0.021; 43 min ± 27 for HPN vs. 53 min ± 49; p = 0.035) with no difference in clamping time (12.6 min ± 8.6 for HPN vs. 12.0 min ± 9.5; p = 0.701). Conclusions Hemopatch® supported renoraphy shows promising results compared to standard renoraphy in PN. No side effects were seen. Further studies should evaluate the prevention of arterio-venous or urinary fistulas. In complex partial nephrectomies Hemopatch® supported renoraphy should be considered.

scholarly journals Comparison of robotic and open partial nephrectomy for highly complex renal tumors (RENAL nephrometry score ≥10)

PLoS ONE ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
pp. e0210413 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jung Kwon Kim ◽  
Hakmin Lee ◽  
Jong Jin Oh ◽  
Sangchul Lee ◽  
Sung Kyu Hong ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Partial Nephrectomy ◽  
Renal Tumors ◽  
Open Partial Nephrectomy ◽  
Nephrometry Score

scholarly journals Renal function after nephron-sparing surgery for renal tumors

2012 ◽  
Vol 65 ◽  
pp. 14-16
Author(s):  
Roman Sosnowski ◽  
Małgorzata Benke ◽  
Tomasz Demkow ◽  
Marcin Ligaj ◽  
Wojciech Michalski
Keyword(s):  
Renal Function ◽  
Nephron Sparing Surgery ◽  
Renal Tumors ◽  
Nephron Sparing

scholarly journals Open Partial Nephrectomy with Zero Ischaemia Using a Supra 12th Rib Miniflank Incision: A Minimally Invasive Open Approach for Small Renal Masses

2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 ◽  
pp. 1-5
Author(s):  
Syed Ali Ehsanullah ◽  
Abida Sultana ◽  
Brian Kelly ◽  
Charlotte Dunford ◽  
Zaheer Shah
Keyword(s):  
Renal Function ◽  
Blood Loss ◽  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Partial Nephrectomy ◽  
Operative Time ◽  
Tumour Size ◽  
Open Approach ◽  
Open Partial Nephrectomy ◽  
Estimated Blood Loss ◽  
The Mean

Introduction. To assess a minimally invasive open technique for partial nephrectomy with zero ischaemia time. Methods. A review was performed in a prospectively maintained database of a single surgeon series of all patients undergoing partial nephrectomy using a supra 12th rib miniflank incision with zero ischaemia. Data of seventy one patients who underwent a partial nephrectomy over an 82-month period were analyzed. Data analyzed included operative time, estimated blood loss, pre and postoperative renal function, complications, final pathological characteristics, and tumour size. Results. Seventy one partial nephrectomies were performed from February 2009 to October 2015. None were converted to radical nephrectomy. Mean operative time was 72 minutes (range 30–250), and mean estimated blood loss was 608 mls (range 100–2500) with one patient receiving blood transfusion. The mean pre and postoperative haemoglobin levels were 144 and 112 g/l. The mean pre and postoperative creatinine levels were 82 and 103 Umol/L. There were 8 Clavian–Dindo Grade 2 complications and 1 major complication (Clavian IIIa). Histology confirmed 24 benign lesions and 47 malignant lesions, 46 cT1a lesions, 24 cT1b lesions, and 1 cT2 lesion. Median follow-up was 38 months with no local recurrence or progression of disease with 5 patients having a positive margin (7%). Conclusion. Our results demonstrate that a supra 12th miniflank incision open partial nephrectomy with zero ischaemic time for SRMs has satisfactory outcomes with preservation of renal function. A minimally invasive open partial nephrectomy remains an important option for units that cannot offer patients a laparoscopic or a robotic procedure.

scholarly journals Trifecta Outcomes in Open, Laparoscopy or Robotic Partial Nephrectomy: Does the Surgical Approach Matter?

2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 8-12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ketan Mehra ◽  
Ramanitharan Manikandan ◽  
Lalgudi Narayanan Dorairajan ◽  
Sreenivasan Sreerag ◽  
Amit Jain ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Partial Nephrectomy ◽  
Perioperative Complications ◽  
Renal Tumors ◽  
Perioperative Outcomes ◽  
Robotic Partial Nephrectomy ◽  
Open Partial Nephrectomy ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Important Position ◽  
The Cost ◽  
Preoperative Creatinine

This retrospective study evaluated perioperative outcomes of open partial nephrectomy (OPN), laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (LPN), and robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) and identified predictive factors of Trifecta achievement for renal tumors that underwent partial nephrectomy (PN) in a single institutional cohort. The study involved patients who underwent PN from January 2011 to July 2018. Trifecta was defined as absence of perioperative complications, no positive surgical margins, and ischemia time <30 min. Fifty-five PN procedures were reviewed: 28 OPN, 14 LPN, and 13 RAPN. OPN, LPN and RAPN had similar median tumor size (5.75, 5.25, and 5 cm), nephrometry score (7, 6, and 6), and preoperative creatinine (1.09, 1.1, and 1.1 mg/dl, respectively). Blood loss was higher for OPN (550 ml) than for LPN (400 ml) and RAPN (300 ml), P = 0.042. Drain was removed after 6 days in OPN which was higher than LPN and RAPN (4.5 and 4 days, respectively), P = 0.008. OPN, LPN, and RAPN had similar median operative time (190, 180, and 180 min, respectively), P = 0.438. Median postoperative stay for OPN, LPN, and RAPN was 5, 6.5, and 10 days, respectively. Trifecta outcomes of 73.1%, 64.3%, and 61.53% were achieved in OPN, LPN, and RAPN, respectively, P = 0.730. It was concluded that Trifecta outcomes had no significant difference among OPN, LPN, and RAPN. LPN can produce as good results as RAPN. Keeping in mind the cost-effectiveness, LPN holds an important position in developing countries where expenditure by patient is a major factor.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document