scholarly journals Update of Infrared Atmospheric Sounding Interferometer (IASI) channel selection with correlated observation errors for numerical weather prediction (NWP)

2020 ◽  
Vol 13 (5) ◽  
pp. 2659-2680
Author(s):  
Olivier Coopmann ◽  
Vincent Guidard ◽  
Nadia Fourrié ◽  
Béatrice Josse ◽  
Virginie Marécal
Keyword(s):  
Numerical Weather Prediction ◽  
Weather Forecasting ◽  
Weather Prediction ◽  
Channel Selection ◽  
Observation Error ◽  
Numerical Weather ◽  
Atmospheric Sounding ◽  
Analysis Error ◽  
Concept Of Information ◽  
Selection Of

Abstract. The Infrared Atmospheric Sounding Interferometer (IASI) is an essential instrument for numerical weather prediction (NWP). It measures radiances at the top of the atmosphere using 8461 channels. The huge amount of observations provided by IASI has led the community to develop techniques to reduce observations while conserving as much information as possible. Thus, a selection of the 300 most informative channels was made for NWP based on the concept of information theory. One of the main limitations of this method was to neglect the covariances between the observation errors of the different channels. However, many centres have shown a significant benefit for weather forecasting to use them. Currently, the observation-error covariances are only estimated on the current IASI channel selection, but no studies to make a new selection of IASI channels taking into account the observation-error covariances have yet been carried out. The objective of this paper was therefore to perform a new selection of IASI channels by taking into account the observation-error covariances. The results show that with an equivalent number of channels, accounting for the observation-error covariances, a new selection of IASI channels can reduce the analysis error on average in temperature by 3 %, humidity by 1.8 % and ozone by 0.9 % compared to the current selection. Finally, we go one step further by proposing a robust new selection of 400 IASI channels to further reduce the analysis error for NWP.

Assimilation of Satellite Cloud and Precipitation Observations in Numerical Weather Prediction Models: Introduction to the JAS Special Collection

2007 ◽  
Vol 64 (11) ◽  
pp. 3737-3741 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ronald M. Errico ◽  
George Ohring ◽  
Fuzhong Weng ◽  
Peter Bauer ◽  
Brad Ferrier ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Numerical Weather Prediction ◽  
Prediction Models ◽  
Weather Forecasting ◽  
International Workshop ◽  
Weather Prediction ◽  
Satellite Observations ◽  
Atmospheric Sciences ◽  
Numerical Weather ◽  
Special Collection ◽  
Numerical Weather Prediction Models

Abstract To date, the assimilation of satellite measurements in numerical weather prediction (NWP) models has focused on the clear atmosphere. But satellite observations in the visible, infrared, and microwave provide a great deal of information on clouds and precipitation. This special collection describes how to use this information to initialize clouds and precipitation in models. Since clouds and precipitation often occur in sensitive regions for forecast impacts, such improvements are likely necessary for continuing to acquire significant gains in weather forecasting. This special collection of the Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences is devoted to articles based on papers presented at the International Workshop on Assimilation of Satellite Cloud and Precipitation Observations in Numerical Weather Prediction Models, in Lansdowne, Virginia, in May 2005. This introduction summarizes the findings of the workshop. The special collection includes review articles on satellite observations of clouds and precipitation (Stephens and Kummerow), parameterizations of clouds and precipitation in NWP models (Lopez), radiative transfer in cloudy/precipitating atmospheres (Weng), and assimilation of cloud and precipitation observations (Errico et al.), as well as research papers on these topics.

scholarly journals Ozone-sensitive channel selection over IASI full spectrum with correlated observation errors for NWP

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Olivier Coopmann ◽  
Vincent Guidard ◽  
Béatrice Josse ◽  
Virginie Marécal ◽  
Nadia Fourrié
Keyword(s):  
Covariance Matrix ◽  
Weather Prediction ◽  
Channel Selection ◽  
Spectral Interval ◽  
Observation Error ◽  
Full Spectrum ◽  
Error Covariance Matrix ◽  
Error Covariance ◽  
One Year ◽  
Selection Of

Abstract. The Infrared Atmospheric Sounding Interferometer (IASI) onboard the Metop satellites provides 8461 channels in the infrared spectrum, covering the spectral interval 645–2760 cm−1 at a resolution of 0.5 cm−1. The high volume of data observation resulting from IASI presents many challenges. In current Numerical Weather Prediction (NWP) models, assimilating all channels is not feasible, due to data transmission, data storage and significant computational costs. One of the methods for reducing the data volume is the channel selection. Many NWP centres use a subset of 314 IASI channels including 15 ozone-sensitive channels. However, this channel selection has been carried out assuming uncorrelated observation errors. In addition, these ozone-sensitive channels have been selected only for ozone information. The objective of this study is to carry out a new selection of IASI ozone-sensitive channels from the full spectrum over a spectral range of 1000–1070 cm−1, in a direct radiance assimilation framework. This selection is done with a full observation error covariance matrix to take into account cross-channel error correlations. A sensitivity method based on the channel spectral sensitivity to variables and a statistical approach based on the Degrees of Freedom for Signal (DFS) have been chosen. To be representative of atmospheric variability, 345 profiles from around the world over a one-year period were selected. The new selection, is evaluated in a One-Dimensional Variational (1D-Var) analyses framework. This selection highlights a new set of 15 IASI ozone-sensitive channels. The results are very encouraging since by adding these 15 channels to 122 operational channels, temperature and humidity analyses are improved by 13.8 % and 20.9 % respectively. Obviously, these 15 channels significantly improve ozone analyses. In addition to considering inter-channel observation error correlations, the channel selection method uses a robust background error covariance matrix that takes into account temperature, humidity and ozone errors using a lagged forecast method over a one-year period. The new selection of IASI ozone-sensitive channels will be soon used in the global 4D-Var ARPEGE (Action de Recherche Petite Echelle Grande Echelle) data assimilation system.

scholarly journals Evaluation of IWV from the numerical weather prediction WRF model with PPP GNSS processing for Bulgaria

2016 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tzvetan Simeonov ◽  
Dmitry Sidorov ◽  
Felix Norman Teferle ◽  
Georgi Milev ◽  
Guergana Guerova
Keyword(s):  
Surface Pressure ◽  
Numerical Weather Prediction ◽  
Weather Forecasting ◽  
Weather Prediction ◽  
Wrf Model ◽  
Mean Difference ◽  
Global Navigation Satellite Systems ◽  
Numerical Weather ◽  
Precipitation Efficiency ◽  
Good Agreement

Abstract. Global Navigation Satellite Systems (GNSS) meteorology is an established operational service providing hourly updated GNSS tropospheric products to the National Meteorologic Services (NMS) in Europe. In the last decade through the ground-based GNSS network densification and new processing strategies like Precise Point Positioning (PPP) it has become possible to obtain sub-hourly tropospheric products for monitoring severe weather events. In this work one year (January–December 2013) of sub-hourly GNSS tropospheric products (Zenith Total Delay) are computed using the PPP strategy for seven stations in Bulgaria. In order to take advantage of the sub-hourly GNSS data to derive Integrated Water Vapour (IWV) surface pressure and temperature with similar temporal resolution is required. As the surface observations are on 3 hourly basis the first step is to compare the surface pressure and temperature from numerical weather prediction model Weather Forecasting and Research (WRF) with observations at three synoptic stations in Bulgaria. The mean difference between the two data-sets for 1) surface pressure is less than 0.5 hPa and the correlation is over 0.989, 2) temperature the largest mean difference is 1.1 °C and the correlation coefficient is over 0.957 and 3) IWV mean difference is in range 0.1–1.1 mm. The evaluation of WRF on annual bases shows IWV underestimation between 0.5 and 1.5 mm at five stations and overestimation at Varna and Rozhen. Varna and Rozhen have also much smaller correlation 0.9 and 0.76. The study of the monthly IWV variation shows that at those locations the GNSS IWV has unexpected drop in April and March respectively. The reason for this drop is likely problems with station raw data. At the remaining 5 stations a very good agreement between GNSS and WRF is observed with high correlation during the cold part of 2013 i.e. March, October and December (0.95) and low correlation during the warm part of 2013 i.e. April to August (below 0.9). The diurnal cycle of the WRF model shows a dry bias in the range of 0.5-1.5 mm. Between 00 and 01 UTC the GNSS IWV tends to be underestimate IWV which is likely due to the processing window used. The precipitation efficiency from GNSS and WRF show very good agreement on monthly bases with a maximum in May-June and minimum in August–September. The annual precipitation efficiency in 2013 at Lovech and Burgas is about 6 %.

One Year of Operational Numerical Weather Prediction, Part II *

1957 ◽  
Vol 38 (6) ◽  
pp. 315-328 ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Numerical Weather Prediction ◽  
Weather Forecasting ◽  
Weather Prediction ◽  
Numerical Weather ◽  
Level Data ◽  
Analysis Center ◽  
Numerical Weather Forecasting ◽  
One Year ◽  
Near Future

This is the second of two brief reports on the activities and results of the Joint Numerical Weather Prediction Unit since May 1955, and is concerned primarily with the accuracy and characteristic errors of the numerical forecasts described in the previous report. The quality of the barotropic and 3-level forecasts has been measured by several statistical indices of error, and compared with that of the subjective forecasts issued by the National Weather Analysis Center. A breakdown of these statistics shows the dependence of forecasting accuracy on length of forecast period, level, data coverage, and proximity of lateral boundaries. Various sources of systematic error are discussed with reference to the JNWP Unit's efforts to isolate and remedy them. After almost a year of experimentation and operational numerical weather forecasting, it is concluded that the quality of the numerical 500 millibar forecasts is not significantly different from that of the best subjective forecasts prepared by methods in current use. Recent results indicate that a significant improvement can be expected in the near future. The numerical 1000 mb forecasts are worse, but recent changes of model show promise of matching the performance of subjective methods. Finally, the most glaring systematic errors of the present numerical forecasts have adequate explanation in existing theory, and can be (or have already been) corrected by generalization of the models.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document