Structure and stratigraphic framework of the basins along the Chinese Continental Margins: new constraints on the Cenozoic plates’ reorganization in Eastern and Southeastern Asia

Author(s):  
Jianye Ren ◽  
Chao Lei ◽  
Junxia Zhang

<p>Bohai Bay, East China Sea and South China Sea are three of the largest-scale Cenozoic petroleum-rich sedimentary basins along the Chinese continental margin. For the past decades, the wealth of geological and geophysical data was acquired by the petroleum industries, which provide an opportunity to have a synthetic study on these basins.</p><p>(1) Structure and stratigraphic framework for the Cenozoic basins in the Bohai Bay, the East China Sea and the South China Sea are revealed to be different. The Bohai Bay basin was imaged to be a pull-apart basin, through which a regional-scale strike-slip fault went. The South China Sea was controlled by extension, which generated a serial of deepwater basins on the hyper-extended crust adjacent to the oceanic crust, most of which was controlled by the detachment faults. Between the Bohai Bay basin and East China Sea is the East China Sea, at the deep level of which a serial of thrust faults occurred. It indicated the regional compression from the pacific plate toward the East China.</p><p>(2) Based on the different structure and stratigraphic sequence in the basins along the Chinese continental margin, the basins evolutions were reconstructed. In Late Paleocene to Middle Eocene, distributed faulting occurred along the Chinese continental margin. Subsequently, in Late Eocene the evolution of these three basins were observed to be different. The Bohai Bay Basin was strongly influenced by the oblique strike-slip faulting, and lasted to the latest Late Oligocene, followed by the thermal subsidence in Miocene and a pulse of acceleration subsidence since Pliocene. In contrast to Bohai Bay basin, the continental shelf basin of the East China Sea experienced a long-time compression in the context of back-arc setting, and subsequently has a regional subsidence since Early Pliocene. The continental crust of the South China Sea was thinned since Late Eocene and eventually broke apart in Oligocene to form oceanic crust, where detachment faults bounded a serial of deepwater basins.</p><p>The different in basin structures and evolutions since Late Eocene was consistent with the event of plate organization in the western Pacific at that time. Before the event, Chinese continental margin was influenced by the interaction of Eurasian and Pacific plates, e.g. double-plate system. The subduction and related retreat of Pacific plate led to the back-arc extension of the Chinese continental margin, generating widely distributed grabens and half grabens filled with sediments. After this event, the Chinese continental margin was deformed by the interaction between India, Eurasian, Pacific and Philippine Sea plates, e.g. multi-plate system. In this context, several dynamic forces affected the evolution of the Chinese continental margins was observed, e.g. the collision between India and Eurasia, the change of the subduction direction of the Pacific plate, the subduction collision of the proto-South China Sea, the northward movement of the Philippine Sea plate. These complex plate reorganizations lead to the different genetic type of basins in Chinese continental margin.</p>

2011 ◽  
Vol 40 (2) ◽  
pp. 165-193 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andy Yee

This article systematically compares maritime territorial disputes in the East and South China Seas. It draws on the bargaining model of war and hegemonic stability theory to track the record of conflicts and shifts in the relative power balances of the claimants, leading to the conclusion that certainty and stability have improved in the South China Sea, with the converse happening in the East China Sea. To enrich the models, this article also considers social factors (constructivism) and arrives at the same conclusion. This calls for a differentiated methodological approach if we are to devise strategies to mediate and resolve these disputes.


2019 ◽  
Vol 46 (5) ◽  
pp. 807-816
Author(s):  
Le Duc Luong ◽  
Renat B. Shakirov ◽  
Nguyen Hoang ◽  
Ryuichi Shinjo ◽  
Anatoly Obzhirov ◽  
...  

1980 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
pp. 263
Author(s):  
K. Mukhtar ◽  
M.R. Morrison

China has made extensive claims to the offshore resources in the Yellow Sea, the East China Sea and the South China Sea. In the East China Sea, China claims sovereignty over the entire continental shelf. South Korea, Japan and Taiwan also claim seabed rights on the continental shelf. These claims overlap particularly in the prospective oil-bearing area west of the Okinawa Trough. The relevant principles of international law advanced by these countries in support of their respective claims are also examined. The disputes involve a complex mix of political, economic, legal, historical and cultural factors. In the South China Sea the disputes mainly concern the ownership of islands as distinct from competing claims to the continental shelf in the East China Sea. The most significant of these disputes is between China and Vietnam and particularly concerns the Parace and Spratly Islands.The People's Republic of China is determined to become a major world oil producer. The technology and huge finance required to achieve this objective must be obtained by co-operating with foreign sources. In order to co-ordinate this activity, the Chinese have established a complex petroleum administration. Examination of China's recent production history and ambitions demonstrates the need for China to seek foreign assistance to obtain production targets. China has recently concluded geophysical agreements with foreign entities in eight offshore areas. In addition, it has concluded an ambitious exploration/development agreement with Japan National Oil Corporation. The experience of industry in dealing with Chinese authorities with special emphasis on negotiating techniques is briefly described.


IEEE Access ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 7 ◽  
pp. 82753-82763 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chong-Wei Zheng ◽  
Guo-Xiang Wu ◽  
Xuan Chen ◽  
Qing Wang ◽  
Zhan-Sheng Gao ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document