The Effects of Wedge Posting Location of Foot Orthotic on Running Kinematics and Eye-closed Single Leg Balance of the Lower Extremity

2019 ◽  
Vol 77 ◽  
pp. 477-486
Author(s):  
Sung-Cheol Lee ◽  
Chang-Young Kim ◽  
Sae-Yong Lee
2006 ◽  
Vol 38 (Supplement) ◽  
pp. S123
Author(s):  
Ashley S. Baker ◽  
Jack E. Taunton ◽  
Don C. McKenzie ◽  
Richard Beauchamp

2011 ◽  
Vol 27 (2) ◽  
pp. 130-136 ◽  
Author(s):  
Walter L. Jenkins ◽  
D.S. Williams ◽  
Brandon Bevil ◽  
Sara Stanley ◽  
Michael Blemker ◽  
...  

Excessive hip motion has been linked to lower extremity pathology. Foot orthoses are commonly used to control motion within lower extremity joints when lower extremity pathology and dysfunction are present. Few studies have investigated the effect of foot orthoses on hip angular kinematics during functional activities. Eighteen females and 18 males performed a vertical jump with and without a prefabricated foot orthoses to determine the biomechanical effect of foot orthoses on hip kinematics when landing from a jump. Data collection included three-dimensional motion analysis of the lower extremity. Pairedttests were performed to determine if differences existed within genders with and without foot orthoses. At the hip joint, there was significantly less hip adduction motion in the foot orthoses condition as compared with the no foot orthoses condition in females (p< .05). There were no differences between foot orthoses conditions in males. Females appear to have a different proximal response to foot orthoses when landing from a forward jump than males.


2010 ◽  
Vol 26 (4) ◽  
pp. 390-399 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christopher L. MacLean ◽  
Richard van Emmerik ◽  
Joseph Hamill

The purpose of this study was to analyze the influence of a custom foot orthotic (CFO) intervention on lower extremity intralimb coupling during a 30-min run in a group of injured runners and to compare the results to a control group of healthy runners. Three-dimensional kinematic data were collected during a 30-min run on healthy female runners (Shoe-only) and a group of female runners who had a recent history of overuse injury (Shoe-only and Shoe with custom foot orthoses). Results from the study revealed that the coordination variability and pattern for the some couplings were influenced by history of injury, foot orthotic intervention and the duration of the run. These data suggest that custom foot orthoses worn by injured runners may play a role in the maintenance of coordination variability of the tibia (transverse plane) and calcaneus (frontal plane) coupling during the Early Stance phase. In addition, it appears that the coupling angle between the knee (transverse plane) and rearfoot (frontal plane) joints becomes more symmetrical in the late stance phase as a run progresses.


2006 ◽  
Vol 16 (2) ◽  
pp. 185-186
Author(s):  
A.S. Baker ◽  
J.E. Taunton ◽  
D.C. McKenzie ◽  
R. Beauchamp

2009 ◽  
Vol 25 (1) ◽  
pp. 54-63 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christopher L. MacLean ◽  
Irene S. Davis ◽  
Joseph Hamill

The purpose of this study was to analyze the influence of varying running shoe midsole composition on lower extremity dynamics with and without a custom foot orthotic intervention. Three-dimensional dynamics were collected on 12 female runners who had completed 6 weeks of custom foot orthotic therapy. Participants completed running trials in 3 running shoe midsole conditions—with and without a custom foot orthotic intervention. Results from the current study revealed that only maximum rearfoot eversion velocity was influenced by the midsole durometer of the shoe. Maximum rearfoot eversion velocity was significantly decreased for the hard shoe compared with the soft shoe. However, the orthotic intervention in the footwear led to significant decreases in several dynamic variables. The results suggest that the major component influencing the rearfoot dynamics was the orthotic device and not the shoe composition. In addition, data suggest that the foot orthoses appear to compensate for the lesser shoe stability enabling it to function in a way similar to that of a shoe of greater stability.


2006 ◽  
Vol 21 (6) ◽  
pp. 623-630 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christopher MacLean ◽  
Irene McClay Davis ◽  
Joseph Hamill

2006 ◽  
Vol 96 (5) ◽  
pp. 408-412 ◽  
Author(s):  
Walter L. Jenkins ◽  
Susanne G. Raedeke

One hundred thirty-two female basketball players were observed for lower-extremity overuse injury between 1993 and 2004. Athletes studied between 1993 and 1996 did not receive foot orthotic devices and composed the control group. The treatment group comprised athletes studied between 1996 and 2004. Athletes in the treatment group were given a foot orthotic device before participation in basketball. Data analysis included lower-extremity overuse injury rates and the effect of foot orthotic devices on lower-extremity overuse injury rates by means of an incidence density ratio. The control group had a lower-extremity overuse injury rate of 5.37 per 1,000 exposures, and the treatment group had a rate of 6.44 per 1,000 exposures. The incidence density ratio was not significant (P = .44). This study rejects the concept that foot orthotic devices may assist in prevention of lower-extremity overuse injury in female basketball players. (J Am Podiatr Med Assoc 96(5): 408–412, 2006)


1979 ◽  
Vol 7 (6) ◽  
pp. 338-342 ◽  
Author(s):  
B.T. Bates ◽  
L.R. Osternig ◽  
B. Mason ◽  
L.S. James

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document