Influence of Running Shoe Midsole Composition and Custom Foot Orthotic Intervention on Lower Extremity Dynamics during Running

2009 ◽  
Vol 25 (1) ◽  
pp. 54-63 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christopher L. MacLean ◽  
Irene S. Davis ◽  
Joseph Hamill
Keyword(s):  
Lower Extremity ◽  
Three Dimensional ◽  
Foot Orthoses ◽  
Orthotic Device ◽  
Rearfoot Eversion ◽  
Foot Orthotic ◽  
Dynamic Variables

The purpose of this study was to analyze the influence of varying running shoe midsole composition on lower extremity dynamics with and without a custom foot orthotic intervention. Three-dimensional dynamics were collected on 12 female runners who had completed 6 weeks of custom foot orthotic therapy. Participants completed running trials in 3 running shoe midsole conditions—with and without a custom foot orthotic intervention. Results from the current study revealed that only maximum rearfoot eversion velocity was influenced by the midsole durometer of the shoe. Maximum rearfoot eversion velocity was significantly decreased for the hard shoe compared with the soft shoe. However, the orthotic intervention in the footwear led to significant decreases in several dynamic variables. The results suggest that the major component influencing the rearfoot dynamics was the orthotic device and not the shoe composition. In addition, data suggest that the foot orthoses appear to compensate for the lesser shoe stability enabling it to function in a way similar to that of a shoe of greater stability.

Gender and Foot Orthotic Device Effect on Frontal Plane Hip Motion During Landing From a Vertical Jump

2011 ◽  
Vol 27 (2) ◽  
pp. 130-136 ◽  
Author(s):  
Walter L. Jenkins ◽  
D.S. Williams ◽  
Brandon Bevil ◽  
Sara Stanley ◽  
Michael Blemker ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lower Extremity ◽  
Vertical Jump ◽  
Three Dimensional ◽  
Frontal Plane ◽  
Foot Orthoses ◽  
Functional Activities ◽  
Hip Motion ◽  
Hip Kinematics ◽  
Biomechanical Effect ◽  
Foot Orthotic

Excessive hip motion has been linked to lower extremity pathology. Foot orthoses are commonly used to control motion within lower extremity joints when lower extremity pathology and dysfunction are present. Few studies have investigated the effect of foot orthoses on hip angular kinematics during functional activities. Eighteen females and 18 males performed a vertical jump with and without a prefabricated foot orthoses to determine the biomechanical effect of foot orthoses on hip kinematics when landing from a jump. Data collection included three-dimensional motion analysis of the lower extremity. Pairedttests were performed to determine if differences existed within genders with and without foot orthoses. At the hip joint, there was significantly less hip adduction motion in the foot orthoses condition as compared with the no foot orthoses condition in females (p< .05). There were no differences between foot orthoses conditions in males. Females appear to have a different proximal response to foot orthoses when landing from a forward jump than males.

Influence of Custom Foot Orthotic Intervention on Lower Extremity Intralimb Coupling during a 30-Minute Run

2010 ◽  
Vol 26 (4) ◽  
pp. 390-399 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christopher L. MacLean ◽  
Richard van Emmerik ◽  
Joseph Hamill
Keyword(s):  
Lower Extremity ◽  
Stance Phase ◽  
Three Dimensional ◽  
Frontal Plane ◽  
Transverse Plane ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Foot Orthoses ◽  
History Of ◽  
Coupling Angle ◽  
Foot Orthotic

The purpose of this study was to analyze the influence of a custom foot orthotic (CFO) intervention on lower extremity intralimb coupling during a 30-min run in a group of injured runners and to compare the results to a control group of healthy runners. Three-dimensional kinematic data were collected during a 30-min run on healthy female runners (Shoe-only) and a group of female runners who had a recent history of overuse injury (Shoe-only and Shoe with custom foot orthoses). Results from the study revealed that the coordination variability and pattern for the some couplings were influenced by history of injury, foot orthotic intervention and the duration of the run. These data suggest that custom foot orthoses worn by injured runners may play a role in the maintenance of coordination variability of the tibia (transverse plane) and calcaneus (frontal plane) coupling during the Early Stance phase. In addition, it appears that the coupling angle between the knee (transverse plane) and rearfoot (frontal plane) joints becomes more symmetrical in the late stance phase as a run progresses.

Late Rearfoot Eversion and Lower-limb Internal Rotation Caused by Changes in the Interaction between Forefoot and Support Surface

2009 ◽  
Vol 99 (6) ◽  
pp. 503-511 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thales R. Souza ◽  
Rafael Z. Pinto ◽  
Renato G. Trede ◽  
Renata N. Kirkwood ◽  
Antônio E. Pertence ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lower Extremity ◽  
Internal Rotation ◽  
Lower Limb ◽  
Repeated Measures ◽  
Three Dimensional ◽  
Support Surface ◽  
Kinetic Chain ◽  
Mechanical Factors ◽  
Lateral Wedges ◽  
Rearfoot Eversion

Background: The influence of distal mechanical factors that change the interaction between the forefoot and the support surface on lower-limb kinematics is not well established. This study investigated the effects of the use of lateral wedges under the forefoot on the kinematics of the lower extremity during the stance phase of walking. Methods: Sixteen healthy young adults participated in this repeated-measures study. They walked wearing flat sandals and laterally wedged sandals, which were medially inclined only in the forefoot. One wedged sandal had a forefoot lateral wedge of 5° and the other wedged sandal had a forefoot lateral wedge of 10°. Kinematic variables of the lower extremity, theoretically considered clinically relevant for injury development, were measured with a three-dimensional motion analysis system. The variables were evaluated for three subphases of stance: loading response, midstance, and late stance. Results: The 5° laterally wedged sandal increased rearfoot eversion during midstance and the 10° laterally wedged sandal increased rearfoot eversion during mid- and late stances, in comparison to the use of flat sandals. The 10° laterally wedged sandal produced greater internal rotation of the shank relative to the pelvis and of the hip joint, during the midstance, also compared to the use of flat sandals. Conclusions: Lateral wedges under the forefoot increase rearfoot eversion during mid-and late stances and may cause proximal kinematic changes throughout the lower-extremity kinetic chain. Distal mechanical factors should be clinically addressed when a patient presents late excessive rearfoot eversion during walking. (J Am Podiatr Med Assoc 99(6): 503–511, 2009)

scholarly journals Effects of Varus Orthotics on Lower Extremity Kinematics During the Pedal Cycle

2014 ◽  
Vol 15 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jonathan Sinclair ◽  
Hayley Vincent ◽  
Paul John Taylor ◽  
Jack Hebron ◽  
Howard Thomas Hurst ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Motion Capture ◽  
Repeated Measures ◽  
Three Dimensional ◽  
Foot Orthoses ◽  
Kinematic Parameters ◽  
Orthotic Device ◽  
High Incidence ◽  
Chronic Injuries ◽  
Kinematic Information ◽  
System Operating

AbstractPurpose. Cycling has been shown to be associated with a high incidence of chronic pathologies. Foot orthoses are frequently used by cyclists in order to reduce the incidence of chronic injuries. The aim of the current investigation was to examine the influence of different varus orthotic inclines on the three-dimensional kinematics of the lower extremities during the pedal cycle. Methods. Kinematic information was obtained from ten male cyclists using an eight-camera optoelectronic 3-D motion capture system operating at 250 Hz. Participants cycled with and without orthotic intervention at three different cadences (70, 90 and 110 RPM). The orthotic device was adjustable and four different wedge conditions (0 mm - no orthotic, 1.5 mm, 3.0 mm and 4.5 mm) were examined. Two-way repeated measures ANOVAs were used to compare the kinematic parameters obtained as a function of orthotic inclination and cadence. Participants were also asked to subjectively rate their comfort in cycling using each of the four orthotic devices on a 10-point Likert scale. Results. The kinematic analysis indicated that the orthotic device had no significant influence at any of the three cadences. Analysis of subjective preferences showed a clear preference for the 0 mm, no orthotic, condition. Conclusions. This study suggests that foot orthoses do not provide any protection from skeletal malalignment issues associated with the aetiology of chronic cycling injuries.

Sex Differences and Discriminative Value of Lower Extremity Alignments and Kinematics during Two Functional Tasks

2010 ◽  
Vol 26 (3) ◽  
pp. 295-304 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jennifer M. Medina McKeon ◽  
Craig R. Denegar ◽  
Jay Hertel
Keyword(s):  
Lower Extremity ◽  
Vertical Jump ◽  
Three Dimensional ◽  
Frontal Plane ◽  
Discriminative Value ◽  
Discriminant Analyses ◽  
Males And Females ◽  
Kinematic Measures ◽  
The Right ◽  
Dynamic Variables

The purpose of this study was to formulate a predictive equation to discriminate males from females using static and dynamic lower extremity (LE) alignments. Twenty-four healthy adults volunteered to participate. Three-dimensional motion analysis was used to assess the kinematics of the right hip and knee during two functional tasks. Six measures of static LE alignment were also performed. Statistical comparisons were made between males and females for all variables. Static and dynamic variables that were significantly different by sex were entered into separate discriminant analyses for each task. The resulting equations were each able to correctly predict 87% of the subjects by sex. Fifty-eight percent and 55% of the variance was explained by sex for the vertical jump and plant & jump, respectively. The frontal plane hip angle was the best predictor of sex for both tasks. While there were statistically significant differences between the sexes for static measures of LE alignment, kinematic measures were better at discriminating between sexes.

In-Shoe Pressure Measurement and Foot Orthosis Research

2010 ◽  
Vol 100 (6) ◽  
pp. 518-529 ◽  
Author(s):  
Simon K. Spooner ◽  
David K. Smith ◽  
Kevin A. Kirby
Keyword(s):  
Pressure Measurement ◽  
Three Dimensional ◽  
Foot Orthoses ◽  
Deformation Characteristics ◽  
Locomotor Apparatus ◽  
Measurement Systems ◽  
Reaction Forces ◽  
Kinetic Effects ◽  
Foot Orthotic ◽  
Foot Orthosis

Foot orthoses are believed to exert their therapeutic effect on the human locomotor apparatus by altering the location, magnitude, and temporal patterns of ground reaction forces acting on the plantar foot during weightbearing activities. In-shoe pressure-measurement systems are increasingly being used by clinicians and researchers to assess kinetic changes at the foot-orthosis interface to better understand the function of foot orthoses and to derive more efficacious treatments for many painful foot and lower-extremity abnormalities. This article explores how the inherent three-dimensional surface topography and load-deformation characteristics of foot orthoses may challenge the validity, reliability, and clinical usefulness of the data obtained from in-shoe pressure-measurement systems in the context of foot orthotic therapy and research. The inability of in-shoe pressure-measurement systems to measure shearing forces beneath the foot, the required bending of the flat two-dimensional sensor insole to fit the pressure insole to the three-dimensional curves of the orthosis, the subsequent unbending of the sensor insole to display it on a computer monitor, and variations in the load-deformation characteristics of orthoses are all sources of potential error in examination of the kinetic effects of foot orthoses. Consequently, caution is required when interpreting the results of orthotic research that has used in-shoe pressure insole technology. The limitations of the technology should also be given due respect when in-shoe pressure measurement is used to make clinical decisions and prescribe custom foot orthoses for patients. (J Am Podiatr Med Assoc 100(6): 518–529, 2010)

Three-dimensional measurements of the lower extremity in children and adolescents using a low-dose biplanar X-ray device

2011 ◽  
Vol 22 (4) ◽  
pp. 765-771 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ramon Gheno ◽  
Eric Nectoux ◽  
Bernard Herbaux ◽  
Matteo Baldisserotto ◽  
Luiz Glock ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lower Extremity ◽  
Children And Adolescents ◽  
Low Dose ◽  
Three Dimensional ◽  
X Ray ◽  
Dimensional Measurements

scholarly journals The effects of ankle-foot orthoses with plantar flexion stop and plantar flexion resistance using rocker-sole shoes on stroke gait: A randomized-controlled trial

2021 ◽  
Vol 67 (4) ◽  
pp. 449-461
Author(s):  
Aliyeh Daryabor ◽  
Gholamreza Aminian ◽  
Mokhtar Arazpour ◽  
Mina Baniasad ◽  
Sumiko Yamamoto
Keyword(s):  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Plantar Flexion ◽  
Three Dimensional ◽  
Chronic Phase ◽  
Controlled Study ◽  
Foot Orthoses ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Ankle Foot Orthoses ◽  
Spatiotemporal Parameters ◽  
Single Support Phase

Objectives: This study aims to evaluate the effect of two ankle-foot orthoses (AFOs), AFO with plantar flexion stop (AFO-PlfS), and AFO with plantar flexion resistance (AFO-PlfR), while wearing standard shoes and rocker-sole shoes. Patients and methods: Between November 2017 and July 2018, in this randomized-controlled study, a total of 20 stroke patients (8 males, 12 females; mean age: 48.1 years; range, 33 to 65 years) in chronic phase were randomized to AFO groups (AFO-PlfS group, n=10 and AFO-PlfR group, n=10). Each group received the allocated AFO along with two kinds of shoes (standard shoe and rocker shoe) for a two-week adaptation. Two effects were separately evaluated: The orthotic effect and rocker shoe effect were defined as the evaluation of using an AFO wearing standard shoe compared to only standard shoe, and evaluation of using an AFO wearing rocker shoe compared to an AFO wearing standard shoe, respectively. The gait of each group was measured by three-dimensional motion analysis. Results: A significant orthotic effect was found in both AFO groups in spatiotemporal parameters and maximum ankle dorsiflexion in the single-support phase. Additionally, the AFO-PlfR group showed a significant improvement in the parameters related to the first rocker of gait, but not for AFO-PlfS group concerning the orthotic effect. The rocker shoe effect was found in significant reduction of peak ankle plantar flexor moment and power ankle generation during preswing for both AFO groups. Conclusion: According to the orthotic effect, an AFO-PlfR can create better function in the improvement of parameters related to the first rocker. Although a rocker shoe can facilitate rollover for weight progression in the third rocker of gait, it cannot make a strong push-off function in stroke survivors.

scholarly journals The Effect of Shoe Design and Custom Foot Orthotic Intervention on Lower Extremity Dynamics in Female Runners

2006 ◽  
Vol 38 (Supplement) ◽  
pp. S123
Author(s):  
Ashley S. Baker ◽  
Jack E. Taunton ◽  
Don C. McKenzie ◽  
Richard Beauchamp
Keyword(s):  
Lower Extremity ◽  
Shoe Design ◽  
Foot Orthotic

Lower Extremity Joint Work During Acceleration, Deceleration, and Steady State Running

2017 ◽  
Vol 33 (1) ◽  
pp. 56-63 ◽  
Author(s):  
D.S. Blaise Williams ◽  
Jonathan H. Cole ◽  
Douglas W. Powell
Keyword(s):  
Steady State ◽  
Lower Extremity ◽  
Sagittal Plane ◽  
Three Dimensional ◽  
Joint Work ◽  
Negative Work ◽  
Relative Contribution ◽  
Acceleration And Deceleration ◽  
The Individual ◽  
Positive Work

Running during sports and for physical activity often requires changes in velocity through acceleration and deceleration. While it is clear that lower extremity biomechanics vary during these accelerations and decelerations, the work requirements of the individual joints are not well understood. The purpose of this investigation was to measure the sagittal plane mechanical work of the individual lower extremity joints during acceleration, deceleration, and steady-state running. Ten runners were compared during acceleration, deceleration, and steady-state running using three-dimensional kinematics and kinetics measures. Total positive and negative joint work, and relative joint contributions to total work were compared between conditions. Total positive work progressively increased from deceleration to acceleration. This was due to greater ankle joint work during acceleration. While there was no significant change in total negative work during deceleration, there was a greater relative contribution of the knee to total negative work with a subsequent lower relative ankle negative work. Each lower extremity joint exhibits distinct functional roles in acceleration compared with deceleration during level running. Deceleration is dominated by greater contributions of the knee to negative work while acceleration is associated with a greater ankle contribution to positive work.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document