MORE THAN JUST NUMBERS: CHALLENGES FOR PROFESSIONAL STATISTICIANS

2017 ◽  
Vol 16 (2) ◽  
pp. 362-375
Author(s):  
CLAIRE CAMERON ◽  
ELLA IOSUA ◽  
MATTHEW PARRY ◽  
ROSALINA RICHARDS ◽  
CHRYSTAL JAYE

This paper describes a qualitative survey of professional statisticians carried out in New Zealand in 2014. The aim of the study was to find out if the issues this group faced were consistent with those identified in the literature. The issues identified were integrity, legitimacy, isolation, workforce shortage, communication, and marginalisation. They represent points of frustration for statisticians that may impact on the future of the profession as it responds to increasing demands and higher expectations. We found that these issues resonated for many of the statisticians included in our study and we have discussed a number of strategies to address them. They include raising our profile, attracting a broader range of people to the profession, increasing our communication skills, raising the statistical literacy of the people we work with, and a commitment to making it easy to engage with our colleagues. First published November 2017 at Statistics Education Research Journal Archives

2017 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
pp. 31-37
Author(s):  
CHRIS J. WILD

“The Times They Are a-Changin’” says the old Bob Dylan song. But it is not just the times that are a-changin’. For statistical literacy, the very earth is moving under our feet (apologies to Carole King). The seismic forces are (i) new forms of communication and discourse and (ii) new forms of data, data display and human interaction with data. These upheavals in the worlds of communication and data are ongoing. If anything, the pace of change is accelerating. And with it, what it means to be statistically literate is also changing. So how can we tell what is important? We will air some enduring themes and guiding principles. First published May 2017 at Statistics Education Research Journal Archives


2019 ◽  
Vol 18 (2) ◽  
pp. 94
Author(s):  
JENNIFER J. KAPLAN

Acknowledgment: We are grateful to the people who acted as referees for the Statistics Education Research Journal in the past year. First published November 2019 at Statistics Education Research Journal Archives  


2012 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 128
Author(s):  
ROBERT DELMAS ◽  
PETER PETOCZ

Acknowledgment: We are grateful to the people who acted as referees for all issues of the Statistics Education Research Journal published this year. First published November 2012 at Statistics Education Research Journal: Archives


2011 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 80
Author(s):  
ROBERT DELMAS ◽  
PETER PETOCZ

Acknowledgment: We are grateful to the people who acted as referees for all issues of the Statistics Education Research Journal published this year. First published November 2011 at Statistics Education Research Journal: Archives


2017 ◽  
Vol 16 (2) ◽  
pp. 523-524
Author(s):  
MANFRED BOROVCNIK ◽  
MAXINE PFANNKUCH

Acknowledgment: We are grateful to the people who acted as referees for all issues of the Statistics Education Research Journal published this year. First published November 2017 at Statistics Education Research Journal: Archives


2016 ◽  
Vol 15 (2) ◽  
pp. 265
Author(s):  
MANFRED BOROVCNIK ◽  
PETER PETOCZ ◽  
MAXINE PFANNKUCH

Acknowledgment: We are grateful to the people who acted as referees for all issues of the Statistics Education Research Journal published this year. First published November 2016 at Statistics Education Research Journal: Archives


2014 ◽  
Vol 13 (2) ◽  
pp. 13-14
Author(s):  
MAXINE PFANNKUCH ◽  
PETER PETOCZ ◽  
ROBERT DELMAS

First published November 2014 at Statistics Education Research Journal Archives


2017 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
pp. 217-227
Author(s):  
PHOEBE ARNOLD

Full Fact is an independent, non-partisan fact-checking charity. A particular focus is the analysis of factual claims in political debate in the UK; for example, fact-checking claims and counterclaims made during Prime Minister’s questions. Facts do not appear in a vacuum as they are often used as key elements in an effort to make a coherent argument. This paper describes a number of case histories where facts are disputed, drawn from our election work, to give an overview of the contemporary state of statistical literacy among politicians and the media. Common pitfalls in politicians’ claims are set out, along with descriptions of our attempts to close the communication gap between different communities. First published May 2017 at Statistics Education Research Journal Archives


2017 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
pp. 38-43
Author(s):  
THEODOSIA PRODROMOU

The data revolution has given citizens access to enormous large-scale open databases. In order to take into account the full complexity of data, we have to change the way we think in terms of the nature of data and its availability, the ways in which it is displayed and used, and the skills that are required for its interpretation. Substantial changes in the content and processes involved in statistics education are needed. This paper calls for the introduction of new pedagogical constructs and principles needed in the age of the data revolution. The paper deals with a new construct of statistical literacy. We describe principles and dispositions that will become the building blocks of our pedagogical model. Our model suggests that effective engagement with large-scale data, modelling and interpretation situations requires the presence of knowledge-bases as well as supporting dispositions. First published May 2017 at Statistics Education Research Journal Archives


2014 ◽  
Vol 13 (2) ◽  
pp. 236-237
Author(s):  
MAXINE PFANNKUCH ◽  
PETER PETOCZ ◽  
ROBERT DELMAS

Acknowledgment: We are grateful to the people who acted as referees for the Statistics Education Research Journal in the past year. First published November 2014 at Statistics Education Research Journal Archives  


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document