scholarly journals The 2012 North American Society for Sport Management

2012 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 43-48
Author(s):  
Shintaro Sato ◽  
Takanori Honma
Keyword(s):  
North American ◽  
Sport Management ◽  
North American Society ◽  
American Society

If We’re Not Serving Practitioners, Then We're Not Serving Sport Management

1995 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
pp. 237-243 ◽  
Author(s):  
W. James Weese
Keyword(s):  
North American ◽  
Sport Management ◽  
Management Science ◽  
North American Society ◽  
Field Of Study ◽  
The North ◽  
Henry Mintzberg ◽  
Research Findings ◽  
American Society ◽  
Science Leadership

Many people have suggested that management theorists have become overly theoretical and frequently neglect to provide practitioners with the meaningful implications of their research findings. Acclaimed management scientist Henry Mintzberg expressed the same concerns for the leadership field of study. The North American Society for Sport Management could learn from the history and experiences of the management science/leadership fields and provide both academics and practitioners with research that both advances the field and impacts the profession.

A review of the North American Society for Sport Management and its foundational core

2014 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
pp. 81-98 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chad S. Seifried
Keyword(s):  
North American ◽  
Sport Management ◽  
North American Society ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Secondary Sources ◽  
Management History ◽  
The North ◽  
Wide Range ◽  
American Society ◽  
Time Specific

Purpose – The aim of this paper is to explore the development of the North American Society for Sport Management (NASSM) and to map the foundation that specific individuals, historical works, and historians provided the founders of that organization and the field of sport management in general. The paper also aims to track the early beginnings of sport management and present sport as a viable area for business and management historians to conduct their research and discuss theory. Design/methodology/approach – Following the initial work started by deWilde et al., this study drew on a wide range of primary and secondary sources and took an antiquarian and reconstructionist approach. Specifically, time-specific sport-related/focused dissertations, research articles, and archives from NASSM, along with published books and archives, were used to work toward the purpose of the study. Findings – This paper illustrates that some of the critical founding members of sport management and NASSM drew upon the training of historians, with special emphasis from business history, and reacted to specific prompts to create the field (i.e. sport management). “History” and trained historians directly impacted the field of sport management by helping to establish NASSM, the Journal of Sport Management, and graduate study programs, in addition to fashioning the first field accreditation standards and seminal textbooks needed to educate the generalist or specialist sport management student. Research limitations/implications – This research only tracks the beginnings of sport management and focuses on the contribution of “history” toward its development. This work recognizes there were other influences that were critical to the development of sport management. Practical implications – Over time, sport management scholars have moved away from their small historical base and more toward true quantitative preferences. While this has helped the field gain some respectability within contemporary preferences, the re-utilization of historical methods and/or perspectives can help serve the future of sport management and business/management history research toward the study of emerging topics. Through collaboration sport management's leadership can realize the potential of the historical approach/orientation and management historians can enjoy another outlet to communicate their thoughts regarding management topics and theories. Originality/value – The paper highlights that sport is rich in context and available to use for the study of management theory and behaviors.

Sport Management: Past, Present, Future

1987 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 4-24 ◽  
Author(s):  
Earle F. Zeigler
Keyword(s):  
Physical Education ◽  
North American ◽  
Present Status ◽  
Sport Management ◽  
Theory And Practice ◽  
Historical Background ◽  
North American Society ◽  
Canadian Association ◽  
American Society ◽  
Complex Subject

The author argues that present conditions justify an analysis of sport management, broadly interpreted, from the standpoint of its historical background, its present status, and its possible future. Three reasons are given: A new North American Society for Sport Management has just been established; serious criticism has been leveled at both professional sport and so-called educational sport; and management theory and practice has become an increasingly complex subject. Several questions are considered: What has been the historical background of sport management? What is its present status? What plan should be followed for the finest sort of progress in the years ahead? And what may be reasonably concluded from this analysis? The author concludes that (a) the field still has an opportunity to relate significantly to the developing social science of management but time is running short; (b) the vast enterprise that is sport must relate more effectively to the urgent need for qualified managers; (c) the new North American Society for Sport Management can make a significant contribution to this development; and (d) such development should be carried out in full cooperation with the National Association for Sport and Physical Education within the AAHPERD and the Canadian Association for Health, Physical Education, and Recreation.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document