scholarly journals Peritoneal Carcinomatosis and Its Mimics: Review of CT Findings for Differential Diagnosis

2020 ◽  
Vol 104 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Joon Ho Cho ◽  
Seung Soo Kim
1996 ◽  
Vol 35 (1) ◽  
pp. 101
Author(s):  
Young Chae Kim ◽  
Myung Hwan Yoon ◽  
Dal Mo Yang ◽  
Hyo Sun Chung ◽  
Hyung Sik Kim ◽  
...  

1995 ◽  
Vol 33 (4) ◽  
pp. 513
Author(s):  
Ji Yeon Lee ◽  
Seok Tae ◽  
Sang Chun Lee ◽  
Kyoung Ja Shin ◽  
KiI Jun Lee ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 8 (5) ◽  
pp. 455-469 ◽  
Author(s):  
Massimo Tonolini ◽  
Anna Maria Ierardi ◽  
Elena Bracchi ◽  
Paolo Magistrelli ◽  
Adriana Vella ◽  
...  

2008 ◽  
Vol 191 (3) ◽  
pp. 814-825 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ji Yeon Park ◽  
Kyoung Won Kim ◽  
Heon-Ju Kwon ◽  
Mi-Suk Park ◽  
Gui Young Kwon ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
C Tauste Rubio ◽  
S Aguirre Gorospe ◽  
J Zabaleta Jurío ◽  
M Ruiz García ◽  
I Zabaleta Loinaz ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Fattane Shirani ◽  
Azin Shayganfar ◽  
Somayeh Hajiahmadi

Abstract Background The gold standard for verifying COVID-19 mostly depends on microbiological tests like real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). However, the availability of RT-PCR kits can be known as a problem and false negative results may be encountered. Although CT scan is not a screening tool for the diagnosis of COVID-19 pneumonia, given the widespread acquisition of it in the pandemic state, familiarity with different CT findings and possible differential diagnosis is essential in this regard. Main text In this review, we introduced the typical and atypical CT features of COVID-19 pneumonia, and discussed the main differential diagnosis of COVID-19 pneumonia. Conclusions The imaging findings in this viral pneumonia showed a broad spectrum, and there are no pathognomonic imaging findings for COVID-19 pneumonia. Although CT scan is not a diagnostic and screening tool, familiarity with different imaging findings and their differential diagnosis can be helpful in a rapid and accurate decision-making.


1994 ◽  
Vol 31 (2) ◽  
pp. 191
Author(s):  
Hong Soo Kim ◽  
Ju Whan Wee ◽  
Dong Oh Kirn ◽  
Hyun Soon So ◽  
Hak Song Rhee

1991 ◽  
Vol 27 (3) ◽  
pp. 351
Author(s):  
Seung Yon Baek ◽  
Tae Hwan Lim ◽  
Woo Sun Kim ◽  
Kwang Gil Park

1989 ◽  
Vol 25 (6) ◽  
pp. 960
Author(s):  
E S Kim ◽  
M S Park ◽  
O K Cho ◽  
B H Koh ◽  
S Y Kim

2005 ◽  
Vol 63 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
U. Yilmaz ◽  
G. Polat ◽  
N. Sahin ◽  
Ö. Soy ◽  
U. Gülay

Background. CT plays a valuable role in assessment of patients with a wide variety of diseases of the pleura, and pulmonologists should be aware of the significance of different CT findings for the differential diagnosis of benign and malignant pleural diseases. Methods. 155 patients with pleural disease who had undergone CT scans of the lungs and thorax before treatment were enrolled. We retrospectively reviewed CT findings in 146 patients with proven pleural disease. Results. Fifty-nine of the cases were malignant, 87 of them had benign pleural diseases. CT findings that were helpful in distinguishing malignant from benign pleural disease were: 1) pleural nodularity; 2) rind; 3) mediastinal pleural involvement; and 4) pleural thickening greater than 1 cm. The sensitivities and specificities were 37%/97%, 22%/97%, 31%/85%, 35%/87%, respectively. CT findings differentiating malignant pleural mesothelioma from metastatic pleural disease were identified. Findings for malignant mesothelioma were as follows: 1) involvement of interlobar fissure (sensitivity 30%, specificity 92%), 2) pleural thickening greater than 1 cm (sensitivity 60%, specificity 77%). Whereas, findings for metastatic pleural disease were mediastinal/hilar lymph node enlargement and lung parenchymal involvement (P<.05). Conclusion. CT is helpful in the differential diagnosis of pleural diseases, particularly in differentiating malignant from benign conditions and metastatic pleural disease from malignant mesothelioma.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document