clinicopathologic features
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

1652
(FIVE YEARS 369)

H-INDEX

79
(FIVE YEARS 7)

2022 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-5
Author(s):  
Didar GÜRSOY ◽  
İlke Evrim SEÇİNTİ ◽  
Esin DOĞAN ◽  
Muhyittin TEMİZ

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jihui Li ◽  
Shushan Ge ◽  
Shibiao Sang ◽  
Chunhong Hu ◽  
Shengming Deng

PurposeIn the present study, we aimed to evaluate the expression of programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) by radiomic features of 18F-FDG PET/CT and clinicopathological characteristics.MethodsA total 255 NSCLC patients (training cohort: n = 170; validation cohort: n = 85) were retrospectively enrolled in the present study. A total of 80 radiomic features were extracted from pretreatment 18F-FDG PET/CT images. Clinicopathologic features were compared between the two cohorts. The least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression was used to select the most useful prognostic features in the training cohort. Radiomics signature and clinicopathologic risk factors were incorporated to develop a prediction model by using multivariable logistic regression analysis. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to assess the prognostic factors.ResultsA total of 80 radiomic features were extracted in the training dataset. In the univariate analysis, the expression of PD-L1 in lung tumors was significantly correlated with the radiomic signature, histologic type, Ki-67, SUVmax, MTV, and TLG (p< 0.05, respectively). However, the expression of PD-L1 was not correlated with age, TNM stage, and history of smoking (p> 0.05). Moreover, the prediction model for PD-L1 expression level over 1% and 50% that combined the radiomic signature and clinicopathologic features resulted in an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.762 and 0.814, respectively.ConclusionsA prediction model based on PET/CT images and clinicopathological characteristics provided a novel strategy for clinicians to screen the NSCLC patients who could benefit from the anti-PD-L1 immunotherapy.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yapeng Wang ◽  
Xiaoyu Niu ◽  
Lihui Wang ◽  
Yunlong Li ◽  
Baoping Qiao

Abstract Purpose To evaluate clinicopathologic features and survival outcomes of unilocular cystic renal cell carcinoma (cRCC) compared with purely solid renal cell carcinoma (RCC), and to evaluate the oncologic aggressiveness of unilocular cRCC. Methods The relevant data of 957 patients with sporadic unilateral RCCs underwent surgical treatment in 2 institutions from Jan 2014 to Oct 2018 were obtained. We excluded multilocular cystic renal neoplasm of low malignant potential (MCRNLMP), RCCs with multilocular cysts and necrotic RCCs. 74 unilocular cRCCs were identified by pathology reports. We performed propensity score matching (PSM) and randomly selected 148 purely solid RCCs. The clinicopathologic features and survival outcomes were compared properly. Results After PSM, age, BMI, Charlson Comorbidity Index, and postoperative Chronic Kidney Disease grade were not significantly different. Both overall survival and cancer-specific survival of unilocular cRCCs were significantly better than the purely solid RCCs by the log-rank test. Twenty-five cases of solid RCCs were in the pT3 or pT4 stage, while no pT3 or pT4 tumors were found in unilocular cRCCs. Fuhrman grade, pT stage, lymphatic metastasis and tumor diameter were found to be independent prognostic factors. Conclusion Unilocular cRCCs have a lower Fuhrman grade and pathological stage and a better prognosis compared with solid RCC. Unilocular cRCCs still probably have lymphatic metastasis at diagnosis and may have postoperative metastasis, which is different from MCRNLMP. We recommend that the diagnosis of unilocular cRCC should be reflected in pathology reports. Different subtypes of cRCC should be taken into consideration in counseling and management.


Author(s):  
Aanchal Kakkar ◽  
Subiyathul Farah Ashraf ◽  
Amber Rathor ◽  
Amit Kumar Adhya ◽  
Suresh Mani ◽  
...  

Context.— Molecular analysis of poorly differentiated/undifferentiated sinonasal neoplasms has resulted in identification of a growing number of genetically defined tumors. SMARCA4-deficient sinonasal carcinoma is one such recently described entity that emerged from within sinonasal undifferentiated carcinoma (SNUC), neuroendocrine carcinoma (NEC), and teratocarcinosarcoma (TCS). Objective.— To identify SMARCA4-deficient sinonasal carcinomas from a large institutional cohort of poorly differentiated/undifferentiated carcinomas and evaluate their clinicopathologic features. Design.— SMARCA4/BRG1 immunohistochemistry was performed on all tumors diagnosed as SNUC, poorly differentiated carcinoma, NEC, and TCS during a 12-year period. SMARCA2/BRM and INSM1 immunostaining was performed in SMARCA4-deficient cases. Results.— Twelve SMARCA4-deficient sinonasal carcinomas were identified among 299 cases. Morphologically, 5 cases were large cell NEC, 2 cases were small cell NEC, and 5 were TCS. SMARCA4 loss was diffuse and complete in 10 cases, while 2 cases showed focal retention. Most cases showed diffuse cytokeratin staining accompanied by weak, usually focal staining for chromogranin and synaptophysin. INSM-1 showed negativity in most cases. All cases showed retained SMARCA2 expression. IDH1/2 mutation was absent in all cases analyzed. Four of 7 patients died of disease, and aggressive multimodality treatment had better outcome. Conclusions.— SMARCA4-deficient sinonasal carcinomas are morphologically akin to sinonasal poorly differentiated NECs and TCS, display cytokeratin positivity and only focal staining for neuroendocrine markers, and have aggressive biological behavior. Inclusion of SMARCA4 in the immunohistochemical panel for diagnostic workup of all sinonasal NEC and TCS phenotypes will facilitate their early recognition. Comprehensive germline and somatic mutational analyses of these tumors are necessary for further insights into their molecular pathogenesis.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Huan Wang ◽  
Changwen Zhai ◽  
Chen Zhang ◽  
Quan Liu ◽  
Huankang Zhang ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhiyang Zhang ◽  
Penglian Gao ◽  
Zhengqi Bao ◽  
Linggong Zeng ◽  
Junyi Yao ◽  
...  

ObjectiveClear cell carcinoma (CCC) of the endometrium is an uncommon yet aggressive tumor. Few cohort studies are reporting the overall survival time of CCC patients. This study aimed to retrospectively analyze the clinicopathologic features, molecular characteristics and survival data of 27 endometrial CCC patients to improve the understanding of CCC.MethodsThe clinicopathologic features, molecular characteristics and survival data total of 27 CCC patients admitted to the BBMU affiliated hospital (Anhui, China) between January 2005 and December 2018 were retrospectively analyzed. Kaplan-Meier method was used to analyze the prognosis-related factors.ResultsThe median age of the patients was 60 years (range; 39 to 81 years). The average tumor size was 3.8 cm (range; 0.8 to 13.0cm). Myometrial infiltration greater than 50% was reported in 55.6% of the patients, while the Ki-67 index greater than 50% was reported in 70.4% of the patients. The patients’ FIGO (2009) surgical stages were as follows: 18 I, 3 II, 4 III, and 2 IV. Besides, 7 (25.6%) patients had lymphovascular invasion, 3 (11.1%) patients with distant metastasis, including 1 patient with bone metastasis, and 2 with liver metastasis. Adjuvant treatment included 7 with chemotherapy alone, 9 with radiotherapy alone, and 9 with both radiotherapy and chemotherapy. The median overall survival time from the time of CCC diagnosis was 56 months. ER and PR showed negative expression and P16 showed patchy immunostaining. 18 (63%) cases showed Napsin A positive expression. Loss of MSH2, MSH6 and PTEN were seen in 5, 4 and 7 cases respectively. All cases showed HER-2/nue negative expression.ConclusionCCC is a rare and invasive tumor. Age of diagnosis, FIGO stage, tumor size, myometrial infiltration, lymphovascular invasion, distant metastasis, Ki-67 index and P53 expression are important indicators to evaluate patient’s prognosis (P = 0.048, P < 0.001, P = 0.016, P = 0.043, P = 0.001, P < 0.001, P = 0.026, and P = 0.007, respectively). CCC has a worse prognosis than endometrioid carcinoma (P = 0.002), and there is no significant difference when compared with uterine papillary serous carcinoma (P = 0.155).


Author(s):  
Shruti Gupta ◽  
Tiffany Caza ◽  
Sandra M. Herrmann ◽  
Vipulbhai C. Sakhiya ◽  
Kenar D. Jhaveri

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document