A Pelvis Hydatid Cyst Disease Presenting with Perforated Peptic Ulcer Symptoms

Introduction/Objective: Hydatid parasitic infection in humans can be caused by the parasite Echinococcus. Hydatid cysts form mainly in the liver and lungs. Cysts can rarely be found in other organs. Hydatid cyst in the pelvis can be secondary to rupture of the hydatid cyst in the spleen or kidneys. Primary pelvic hydatid cysts are very rare. Complications and symptoms of hydatid cyst depend on its location. Surgery is the basis of treatment for hydatid cysts.

P-BN10 Seasonal Variation of Presentation of Perforated Peptic Ulcer Disease: An Overview of Patient Demographics, Management and Outcomes in Northern Ireland

Background Perforated peptic ulcer disease is one of the most common causes of acute peritonitis. It carries significant mortality and morbidity. Several previous studies have reported a seasonal variation in presentation of patients with perforated ulcers. Here we present this study from a Northern Irish perspective on perforated peptic ulcers. Methods A retrospective cohort study was conducted on perforated peptic ulcer patients who presented to Altnagelvin Area Hospital emergency department between 2015 to 2020. Data on patient demographics, clinical presentation, investigations, management and outcomes were collected. Primary outcome was to investigate if seasonality was associated with incidence of perforated peptic ulcers. Follow-up data was also collected. Seasons were defined as per UK Met Office. Results Results: A total of 50 patients presented with perforated PUD. Male:female ratio was approximately 3:2. Peaks were noted in spring and winter. April was the most common month for presentation followed by December. Smoking was the most common risk factor followed by alcohol abuse. 14 patients (28%) were either very frail or had contained perforations and were conservatively managed. 3 deaths were noted (6%). 13 patients (26%) required ICU admission at some stage in their management. Conclusions Slight seasonal variation was noted in presentation of perforated peptic ulcers in our study with more common incidence in winter and spring months. The month of April was noted to have the peak incidence of the disease in our study.

P-EGS26 Outcomes of Surgical Treatment for Perforated Peptic Ulcer in a non-Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery Centre

Background Perforated peptic ulcer (PPU) remains a common surgical emergency worldwide requiring surgical intervention. Although commonly performed, morbidity and mortality rate remained high. This study aimed to analyze the factors that contribute to the outcome of PPU surgery in a non-upper gastrointestinal surgery center in Malaysia. Methods Data were collected by retrospective review of all PPU surgeries done throughout the year 2020, looking into various preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative details. Results In this study, we have a total of 24 PPU patients underwent surgery resulted in 7 (29.2%) deaths. Majority of our subjects were elderly (median age 65 years, IQR 48.5 – 73.0) with 4 (16%) being of ASA (American Society of Anesthesiologist) category 3 - 4. The most common cause of death was uncontrolled systemic infection in 4 patients (57.1%), followed by 2 (28.6%) fatal arrhythmia and 1 (14.3%) massive upper gastrointestinal bleed. Our analysis found that size of perforation ≥ 30mm (OR = 0.18, 95%CI 0.08 - 0.44), and postoperative complications (OR = 12.5, 95%CI 1.6 – 97.6) were significantly associated with a higher postoperative death. Low serum albumin level (mean 34.3 ± 9.1g/L), negative base excess level (mean -3.28 ± 4.89), and prolonged interval between admission and commencement of surgery (median 750 mins, IQR 258 – 2218) were all significantly associated with increased mortality post PPU surgeries. Conclusions This study highlighted to us various perioperative factors which could potentially be modifiable thus necessary measures can be taken in the future to ensure a better operative outcome of PPU surgery.

Unusual Anastomotic Failure in Patients with COVID-19: A Case Report of 2 Patients

Introduction: A newly appeared challenge for the healthcare system is the variety of clinical symptoms of COVID-19. In this research, we report 2 cases admitted to Modarres Hospital with unusual postoperative anastomotic failure. Case Presentation: In a 72-year-old man with a perforated peptic ulcer in D2 and signs of leakage after the first operation and during the second operation due to massive unexpected hemorrhage, we found fully disrupted anastomosis on the second part of the duodenum. Accordingly, the suture ligature of the bleeding ulcer with the closure of the duodenal stump and loop gastrojejunostomy and tube duodenostomy were performed. During the postoperative period, he developed dyspnea, and the diagnostic test of SARS-CoV-2 confirmed him as a case of COVID-19. Unfortunately, 1 week after the second surgery, evidence of anastomotic leakage appeared again by bile discharge from drains; although it was managed conservatively, he died because of respiratory failure. In another case, a 65-year-old woman was admitted to the emergency ward with closed-loop small bowel obstruction. After emergency laparotomy, resection of ischemic bowel with primary anastomosis was performed. The same as the previous case, she developed dyspnea, and the diagnostic test resulted positive for COVID-19. After 2 weeks, she was admitted to the hospital with signs of anastomotic leakage that was subsequently confirmed by abdominal computed tomography (CT); although it was managed conservatively, she died because of respiratory failure due to COVID-19. Conclusions: These cases were unique in that intestinal microangiopathies can cause very severe problems, weaken the body, and eventually death, as we have seen in these 2 cases.

Risk Factors for Gastrointestinal Leak after Perforated Peptic Ulcer Disease Operative Repair

Background There are limited studies regarding the impact of post-operative leak on perforated peptic ulcer disease (PPUD) and conflicting results regarding routine drain placement in operative repair of PPUD. This study aims to identify risk factors for gastrointestinal leak after operative repair of PPUD to better guide intra-operative decisions about drain placement. Methods We performed a retrospective cohort study at a tertiary care center from 2008 to 2019, identifying 175 patients who underwent operative repair of PPUD. Results Patients who developed a leak (17%) were compared to patients who did not. Both hypoalbuminemia (albumin < 3.5 g/dL) ( P = .03) and duodenal ulcers ( P < .01) were identified as significant risk factors for leak. No significant difference was found between leak and no leak groups for AAST disease severity grade, repair technique, or pre-operative use of tobacco, alcohol, or steroids. Post-operative leaks were associated with prolonged hospital stay (29 days compared to 10, P < .01), increased complication rates (77% compared to 48%, P < .01), and increased re-operation rates (73% compared to 26%, <0.01). No difference was identified in patient characteristics or operative leak rates between patients who had drains placed at the index operation and those that did not. Discussion Leak after operative PPUD repair is associated with significant post-operative morbidity. Hypoalbuminemia and duodenal perforations are significant risk factors for post-operative leaks.

Perforated Peptic Ulcer of the Duodenum After the Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass

Perforated ulcers of the gastric remnant and duodenum seem to be a rare complication after a Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Diagnosis of this complication can be difficult given a vague presentation, however, early intervention is critical to prevent further morbidity. We present the case of a 38-year-old male with a perforated duodenal ulcer nearly a year after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Upon presentation, he complained of 8 hours of epigastric pain. His medical history was significant for chronic peptic ulcer disease and a negative history of H. pylori. Recently, he had been prescribed naproxen by his primary care physician for knee pain. His vital signs were normal with the exception of his systolic blood pressure which was 190 mmHg. He was diaphoretic and peritonitic on exam. He was taken emergently for a diagnostic laparoscopy and found to have a perforation of ∼5 mm of the anterior portion of his duodenum. This was repaired laparoscopically with an omental patch and the patient recovered without any further intervention required. While this is a rare complication reported in the literature, this or similar complications of the remnant stomach may be underrepresented in publications. The surgical intervention of this disease will either be resection of the remnant or an omental patch. However, controversy remains as to the proper post-operative medical treatment. For our patient, the inciting agent was likely the naproxen he was given and this was stopped immediately. Patient education and ownership should remain a cornerstone for patients that have undergone a Roux-en-y gastric bypass.

Common surgical procedures

This chapter addresses common surgical procedures. These include laparotomy; diagnostic laparoscopy; inguinal hernia repair; appendicectomy; cholecystectomy; perforated peptic ulcer repair; haemorrhoidectomy; and excision of pilonidal sinus. Laparotomy is a surgical incision into the abdominal wall to gain access into the abdominal cavity. Minimal invasive surgery aims to cause at least surgical trauma as possible to patients compared to ‘conventional’ open surgery. Benefits include shorter hospital stay, less pain, quicker functional recovery, and superior cosmesis. Pneumoperitoneum induction is the primary step in performing laparoscopy surgery. The chapter then studies stoma formation; small bowel resection and anastomosis; right hemicolectomy; wide local excision of breast lesion; femoral embolectomy; and below knee amputation.