scholarly journals Encadeamentos produtivos e multiplicadores macrossetoriais no Brasil após a abertura comercial

2021 ◽  
Vol 42 (79) ◽  
pp. 670
Author(s):  
José Firmino Sousa Filho ◽  
Gervásio Ferreira dos Santos ◽  
Luiz Carlos de Santana Ribeiro
Keyword(s):  

Este artigo analisa o processo de desenvolvimento produtivo setorial agregado da economia Brasileira de 1990 a 2015 aplicando os índices de encadeamento produtivo e os multiplicadores setoriais para a produção e emprego, utilizando uma abordagem de Insumo-Produto e mesoeconomia. A geração de linkage effects para uma economia é importante, pois desencadeia uma série de resultados positivos desde que sua estrutura esteja interligada e seja capaz de causar spillovers. Assim, a pesquisa pretende contribuir para as discussões acerca das temáticas relativas ao crescimento macrossetorial da economia brasileira explorando o processo de crescimento produtivo como uma ferramenta essencial das relações de produção, demanda e crescimento tecnológico. Os resultados apontam que a estrutura produtiva da economia brasileira não evoluiu na direção de criação e desenvolvimento de encadeamentos produtivos consolidados e os multiplicadores de produção e de emprego diminuíram em grande parte dos setores considerados.

Crop Science ◽  
1984 ◽  
Vol 24 (2) ◽  
pp. 323 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. B. VandeLogt ◽  
M. A. Brinkman ◽  
R. A. Forsberg

2018 ◽  
Vol 22 (3) ◽  
pp. 228-246 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jong Woo Kang ◽  
Suzette Dagli

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to demonstrate that higher tariffs under protectionism will have significant indirect impact through industrial forward and backward linkages, causing greater economic losses to tariff-imposing economies than to exporting countries. Design/methodology/approach The authors use partial equilibrium analysis based on unique multi-regional input-output (IO) data in measuring the second-round spillover effects of higher tariffs, also investigating the scenario of plausible substitutability across import sources as well as sectors based on historical import intensity data. Findings Higher tariffs do not only have a direct impact, but also a significant indirect impact—through forward and backward linkages. Indirect effects can be extensive across economies and sectors—both in forward and backward linkages such as in transport—when value chains are longer and more complex. When possible substitution effects between different import sources and sectors are considered, negative forward linkage effects can be smaller, while negative backward linkage effects become more pronounced. Nevertheless, both negative effects are still found to be much bigger in indirect impacts compared with direct impacts. Research limitations/implications This implies that higher tariffs, including administrative trade measures such as anti-dumping duties and countervailing duties could ironically entail rather greater negative impact on the tariff-imposing importing economies by damaging their exports of domestic sectors using the targeted imports as intermediate inputs, which could be severe if the importing sector has a long value chain in particular through deep forward linkages. Originality/value This paper uses unique multi-regional IO data covering 45 economies’ 35 sectors in analyzing the second-round spillover effects across countries and sectors and employs comparative statics under different scenarios.


2009 ◽  
Vol 56 (3) ◽  
pp. 301-326
Author(s):  
Yay Gürkan ◽  
Serkan Keçeli

In this study, the leading activities of Turkish Economy whose changes in their structure of production, value-added and employment are interrelated with the other activities of the economy, are found by using the input-output model which is presented and called as an 'Application of the General Equilibrium Theory' by Leontief. For this purpose; firstly theoretical foundations of the input-output model are examined. After that, 59 activities of the 2002 Input-Output Table of the Turkish Economy are aggregated at 52 sectors and classified into three categories as Ricardo Sectors, High-Technology Sectors and Heckscher-Ohlin Sectors like Dasgupta and Chakraborty did for the Indian Economy in 2005. Then, the leading, key or strong activities of the economy that are more interrelated with other activities are calculated and found by the Static Leontief Model which is used by the Traditional Methods as the techniques to calculate the linkage effects like Chenery-Watanabe and Rasmussen methods to determine the sectors having the highest priority at investment policies according to the Hirschmanian Unbalanced Growth Model. As a result of the interpretation of Leontief Model, using the traditional methods of Chenery-Watanabe and Rasmussen while calculating the linkage effects rather than the hypothesis extraction methods like Strassert's Original Extraction Method, Cella's Extraction Method, Sonis' Pure Linkage Method and Dietzenbacher and Van der Linden's Method or a SAM (Social Accounting Method) model which does not omit the income generating process (distributing income among primary factors and households as a result of production) of a sector, in Turkey, the Heckscher-Ohlin Sectors mostly seen in the manufacturing industry which Kaldor refers as the engine of growth, are stronger than the other sectors.


RSC Advances ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 6 (91) ◽  
pp. 88531-88537 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chia-Liang Tsai ◽  
Kamani Sudhir K Reddy ◽  
Chen-Yu Yeh ◽  
Chin-Li Wang ◽  
Ching-Yao Lin ◽  
...  

The retention time of resistor type memory devices could be tuned by the linkage groups between porphyrin moiety and DSDA on the PIs. Moreover, the metal zinc also plays an important role in further tuning the memory behavior.


2016 ◽  
Vol 26 (1) ◽  
pp. 351-364 ◽  
Author(s):  
Katharine L. Korunes ◽  
Mohamed A. F. Noor

1977 ◽  
Vol 37 (3) ◽  
pp. 583-604 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rainer Fremdling

The aim of this article is to investigate the railroads' contribution to German economic growth from the 1840s to the 1870s. The analysis focuses on background linkage effects. It is shown that the emergence of the modern German iron industry was due to the railroads' demand for iron products. A comparison with the United States reveals the considerably greater importance of German railroad construction for its domestic iron industry from 1840 to 1860. The British iron industry not only profited from domestic railroad construction but benefited significantly from railroad construction abroad, a fact too often neglected.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document