scholarly journals Selecting Fuzzy Rules for Pattern Classification Systems

2002 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 159-165
Author(s):  
Sang-Bum Lee ◽  
Sung-joo Lee ◽  
Mai-Rey Lee
Author(s):  
Tomoharu Nakashima ◽  
Gerald Schaefer

In this chapter the authors present an overview of pattern classification. In particular, they focus on the mathematical background of pattern classification rather than discussing the practical analysis of various pattern classification methods, and present the derivation of classification rules from a mathematical aspect. First, the authors define the pattern space without the loss of generality. Then, the categorisation of pattern classification is presented according to the design of classification systems. The mathematical formulation of each category of pattern classification is also given. Theoretical discussion using mathematical formulations is presented for distance-based pattern classification and statistical pattern classification. For statistical pattern classification, the standard assumption is made where patterns from each class follow normal distributions with different means and variances.


Author(s):  
Letao Qu ◽  
Bohyun Wang ◽  
Joon S. Lim

Distance measures of fuzzy sets have been developed for feature selection and finding redundant features in the fields of decision-making, prediction, and classification problems. Terms commonly used in the definition of fuzzy sets are normal and convex fuzzy sets. This paper extends the general fuzzy set definitions to subnormal and non-convex fuzzy sets that are more precise when implementing uncertain knowledge representations by weighing fuzzy membership functions. A distance measure method for subnormal and non-convex fuzzy sets is proposed for embedded feature selection. Constructing fuzzy membership functions and extracting fuzzy rules play a critical role in fuzzy classification systems. The weighted fuzzy membership functions prevent the combinatorial explosion of fuzzy rules in multiple fuzzy rule-based systems. The proposed method was validated by a comparison with two other methods. Our proposed method demonstrated higher accuracies in training and test, with scores of 97.95% and 93.98%, respectively, compared to the other two methods.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document