scholarly journals EXPERIENCE IN PROVIDING ASSISTANCE TO VICTIMS WITH COMBINED BONE AND VASCULAR INJURIES OF THE LOWER EXTREMITIES

2022 ◽  
Vol 14 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
A.M. HADJIBAEV ◽  
E.YU. VALIEV ◽  
Sh.M. MUMINOV ◽  
A.J. ISMAILOV ◽  
F.Kh. MIRJALILOV ◽  
...  
2017 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Miguel Angel Montorfano ◽  
Lisandro Miguel Montorfano ◽  
Federico Perez Quirante ◽  
Federico Rodríguez ◽  
Leonardo Vera ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Juan A. Asensio ◽  
Tamer Karsidag ◽  
Aytekin Ünlü ◽  
Juan M. Verde ◽  
Patrizio Petrone

1988 ◽  
Vol 28 (3) ◽  
pp. 319-328 ◽  
Author(s):  
DAVID V. FELICIANO ◽  
KENNETH HERSKOWITZ ◽  
RONALD B. O??GORMAN ◽  
PAMELA A. CRUSE ◽  
MARY L. BRANDT ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 21 (03) ◽  
pp. 336-348 ◽  
Author(s):  
Don Kawakyu-O'Connor ◽  
Mariano Scalgione ◽  
Refky Nicola

Multidetector computed tomography angiography (MDCTA) of the upper and lower extremities is the standard of care in the assessment of trauma patients with vascular trauma of the upper and lower extremities. A MDCTA of the extremities is typically integrated into multiphasic whole-body computed tomography trauma protocols in patients with suspected vascular injury. MDCTA has replaced catheter-directed digital subtraction angiography (DSA) as the modality of choice for the initial detection and characterization of vascular injuries because it is readily available, noninvasive, and faster than DSA. Understanding the imaging findings and pitfalls of upper and lower extremity MDCTA is essential in the diagnosis of vascular injuries such as active hemorrhage, vasospasm and stenosis, hematoma, occlusion and thrombosis, posttraumatic arteriovenous fistula, pseudoaneurysm, and patterns of intimal injury including dissection. We discuss the diagnosis and characterization of vascular injuries of the upper and lower extremities using MDCTA including derived multiplanar reconstructions, maximum intensity projection, and three-dimensional volume rendering techniques.


2017 ◽  
Vol 22 (2) ◽  
pp. 3-5
Author(s):  
James B. Talmage ◽  
Jay Blaisdell

Abstract Physicians use a variety of methodologies within the AMA Guides to the Evaluation of Permanent Impairment (AMA Guides), Sixth Edition, to rate nerve injuries depending on the type of injury and location of the nerve. Traumatic injuries that cause impairment to the peripheral or brachial plexus nerves are rated using Section 15.4e, Peripheral Nerve and Brachial Plexus Impairment, for upper extremities and Section 16.4c, Peripheral Nerve Rating Process, for lower extremities. Verifiable nerve lesions that incite the symptoms of complex regional pain syndrome, type II (similar to the former concept of causalgia), also are rated in these sections. Nerve entrapments, which are not isolated traumatic events, are rated using the methodology in Section 15.4f, Entrapment Neuropathy. Type I complex regional pain syndrome is rated using Section 15.5, Complex Regional Pain Syndrome for upper extremities or Section 16.5, Complex Regional Pain Syndrome for lower extremities. The method for grading the sensory and motor deficits is analogous to the method described in previous editions of AMA Guides. Rating the permanent impairment of the peripheral nerves or brachial plexus is similar to the methodology used in the diagnosis-based impairment scheme with the exceptions that the physical examination grade modifier is never used to adjust the default rating and the names of individual nerves or plexus trunks, as opposed to the names of diagnoses, appear in the far left column of the rating grids.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document