scholarly journals Detection of Apple Scar Skin Viroid by Reverse Transcription Recombinase Polymerase Amplification Assay

2021 ◽  
Vol 27 (2) ◽  
pp. 79-83
Author(s):  
Na-Kyeong Kim ◽  
Hyo-Jeong Lee ◽  
Tae-Ho Ryu ◽  
In-Sook Cho ◽  
Ho-Jong Ju ◽  
...  
2019 ◽  
Vol 102 (2) ◽  
pp. 499-503
Author(s):  
Reetika Kapoor ◽  
Nishant Srivastava ◽  
Rakesh Kumar ◽  
Susheel Kumar Sharma ◽  
Richa Rai ◽  
...  

PLoS ONE ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
pp. e0245164
Author(s):  
Yee Ling Lau ◽  
Ilyiana binti Ismail ◽  
Nur Izati binti Mustapa ◽  
Meng Yee Lai ◽  
Tuan Suhaila Tuan Soh ◽  
...  

Rapid diagnosis is an important intervention in managing the Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) outbreak. Real time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) remains the primary means for diagnosing the new virus strain but it is time consuming and costly. Recombinase polymerase amplification (RPA) is an isothermal amplification assay that does not require a PCR machine. It is an affordable, rapid, and simple assay. In this study, we developed and optimized a sensitive reverse transcription (RT)-RPA assay for the rapid detection of SARS-CoV-2 using SYBR Green I and/or lateral flow (LF) strip. The analytical sensitivity and specificity of the RT-RPA assay were tested by using 10-fold serial diluted synthetic RNA and genomic RNA of similar viruses, respectively. Clinical sensitivity and specificity of the RT-RPA assay were carried out using 78 positive and 35 negative nasopharyngeal samples. The detection limit of both RPA and RT-qPCR assays was 7.659 and 5 copies/μL RNA, respectively with no cross reactivity with other viruses. The clinical sensitivity and specificity of RT-RPA were 98% and 100%, respectively. Our study showed that RT-RPA represents a viable alternative to RT-qPCR for the detection of SARS-CoV-2, especially in areas with limited infrastructure.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document