scholarly journals Rating the State Government Public Pension Plans in the US

2015 ◽  
Vol 4 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jiapeng Liu ◽  
Rui Lu ◽  
Zhengyang Zhang
Water Policy ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 19 (5) ◽  
pp. 837-850 ◽  
Author(s):  
William C. McIntyre ◽  
David C. Mays

Colorado manages water using an administrative structure that is unique among the United States following the doctrine of prior appropriation: Water rights are adjudicated not by the State Engineer, but by Water Courts – separate from and operating in parallel to the criminal and civil courts – established specifically for this purpose. Fundamental to this system is the notion that water rights are property, with consequent protections under the US Constitution, but with the significant constraint that changes in water rights must not injure other water rights, either more senior or more junior. Population growth and climate change will certainly trigger changes in water administration, to be guided by the recent Colorado Water Plan. To provide the foundation necessary to appreciate these changes, this paper reviews the history of Colorado water administration and summarizes the complementary roles of the Water Courts and the State Engineer. Understanding water administration in Colorado depends on a firm grasp on how these two branches of state government formulate and implement water policy.


2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nino Abashidze ◽  
Robert Clark ◽  
Beth Ritter ◽  
David Vanderweide

2003 ◽  
pp. 102-115
Author(s):  
Olivia S. Mitchell ◽  
Kent Smetters

2018 ◽  
Vol 18 (04) ◽  
pp. 500-514 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maria D. Fitzpatrick

AbstractFor many people, working after beginning retirement benefit collection is a way to enhance financial security by increasing income. Existing research has shown that retirees are sensitive to the Social Security earnings test, which restricts the amount of earnings some beneficiaries can receive. However, little is known about the effects of other types of policies on post-retirement employment. Instead of restricting earnings, many public pension plans restrict the number of hours beneficiaries can work. I use return-to-work rules limiting the number of hours of employment in a state's public pension plan and administrative data on employment and retirement to determine the rules’ effects on retirement decisions and post-retirement labor supply. I find that the increases in the maximum number of hours of post-retirement employment lead to no change in retirement benefit collection and to increases in part-time work among retirees. As such, these policies appear to be binding on the labor supply decisions of some employees. These results are relevant for designing policies aimed at extending work-lives or improving the health of pension systems.


1986 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
pp. 75-78 ◽  
Author(s):  
N. Joseph Cayer ◽  
Linda J. Martin ◽  
A. James Ifflander

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document