scholarly journals Key to successful hospital acquired pressure injury reduction: Leadership support and engagement

2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 44
Author(s):  
Sue Creehan ◽  
Joyce Black ◽  
Nick Santamaria ◽  
Jacqui Fletcher ◽  
Paulo Alves

Most acute care facilities are undergoing a major culture change and transforming into a high reliability organization focused on putting the patient experience first by delivering high quality, safe care. Reducing or eliminating hospital acquired conditions (HAC) fuels many quality improvement (QI) projects and successful reductions are attained when the support is rooted both in senior leadership and at the grassroots level. Yet each HAC requires a unique approach; specifically, pressure injury prevention programs have success with senior leaderships awareness and engagement in the complexities of the clinical and pathologic etiology of pressure injury development. This paper highlights for senior management the following evidence based key elements required for an organization to have a successful pressure injury prevention program: senior leadership engagement, a clinical champion, an interdisciplinary team, unit-based skin champions, nimble processes and access to evidence-based products.  

2017 ◽  
Vol 14 (6) ◽  
pp. 1290-1298 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wendy Chaboyer ◽  
Tracey Bucknall ◽  
Brigid Gillespie ◽  
Lukman Thalib ◽  
Elizabeth McInnes ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol Publish Ahead of Print ◽  
Author(s):  
Lisa Zubkoff ◽  
Julia Neily ◽  
Shantia McCoy-Jones ◽  
Christina Soncrant ◽  
Yinong Young-Xu ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S243-S243
Author(s):  
Emily h Werthman

Abstract Introduction In our regional burn center, which treats approximately 800 patients annually, the prevention of pressure injuries continues to challenge the burn team. The nursing team, in particular, was demoralized by a steady prevalence rate despite utilizing evidence based practice. A comprehensive pressure injury reduction plan was developed to provide new strategies to prevent pressure injuries and to provide real time data about the effectiveness of nursing interventions. Methods A team of physicians, nurses, nutritionists, pharmacists, physical and occupational therapists developed a plan to encourage all members of the team to become active participants in pressure injury prevention. The first method was the introduction of a weekly pressure injury survey for all burn patients. This survey ensures any emerging pressure injury is recorded and appropriate interventions taken. Secondly, a new pressure mapping device was installed in all ICU beds in the burn center. The pressure mapping device provides data to nurses during patient repositioning. This important data demonstrated to nurses, in real time, if their offloading was effective. Lastly, a weekly pressure injury analysis provided root cause analysis of any pressure injuries discovered in weekly surveys. As a result, nurses were provided real time feedback about the effectiveness of prevention techniques. Results Reporting of pressure injuries increased over 50% in the first year of the program. In addition, since the inception of the weekly prevalence surveys, the burn center has not not had a pressure injury progress past a stage two. The overall prevalence of pressure injuries has dropped each quarter, Conclusions Providing nurses with real time feedback in the form of real time full body pressure mapping, weekly prevalence and pressure injury analysis allows nurses to quickly change prevention techniques to better offload patients. While pressure injury rates have decreased, nurse involvement in pressure injury prevention has increased. Applicability of Research to Practice Pressure injuries continue to pose a significant challenge to burn patients. Given the continuing emergence of pressure injuries, nurses in our burn center were left demoralized and dissatisfied with their evidence based practice. Providing nurses with real time data to support the effectiveness of their prevention techniques has dramatically changed the culture in our burn center. Nurses are now able to view real time data about their practice through pressure mapping, weekly surveys and pressure injury cause analysis. As a result, nurses are more engaged in the important work of pressure injury prevention.


2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S241-S241
Author(s):  
Alicia Grubbs ◽  
Jocelyn J Mueller ◽  
Jenna C Kelly

Abstract Introduction Patients with dermal burns are at a greater risk of developing pressure injury secondary to critical illness and increased length of stay. Our burn center had four hospital-acquired pressure injuries, grade two or greater, in two months within our patient population. This incidence placed the burn unit in the top five units at our institution with the highest prevalence of hospital-acquired pressure injury. After discussion with nursing staff, we discovered a large variance in pressure injury prevention strategies, many of which were not focused on heel protection. Methods With rising prevalence, the burn team assembled a multidisciplinary team to combat the issue. The team consisted of day and night shift staff nurses, quality improvement nurse, physical therapist, and nursing management. We examined heel injury prevention evidence-based practice and then modified it for our unique patient population to develop a recommendation for best practice on our unit. The recommendations, affectionately known as the Hip Hip Heels Raised Campaign, include: Results To assess compliance to the new unit recommendations, patient positioning audits were completed before and after staff education. Prior to instruction and implementation of the campaign, compliance with heel elevation varied from 75–83%. With this information in mind, our goal was to achieve greater than 90% compliance during audits by January, with education beginning in mid- November. Our goal was met the week of December 27, 2018 and compliance has remained strong, averaging 92% implementation of heel elevation since campaign implementation. Conclusions Per the AHRQ, the average cost of a hospital acquired pressure injury averages $43,180. Our retrospective analysis for patients in our burn center discovered four pressure injuries, grade two or greater, in a two-month period prior to the campaign implementation. Over the five-month span since campaign application, only three pressure injuries have occurred in our patient population, a reduction of approximately seven pressure injuries. This reduction is the equivalence of $300,000 in patient care costs saved. Applicability of Research to Practice This model worked well for our unit and it is applicable to practice in the burn population because it is simple to implement and good for patient care outcomes.


2018 ◽  
Vol 23 (3) ◽  
pp. 123-127 ◽  
Author(s):  
William V Padula ◽  
Patricia M Davidson ◽  
Debra Jackson ◽  
Rachel Pedreira ◽  
Peter J Pronovost

Hospital-acquired conditions such as pressure injuries, falls, and infections are common, costly, and deadly. Addressing the simultaneous needs of evidence-based prevention guidelines for multiple conditions can be challenging for clinical teams. Current payment incentives created by The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services using the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality Patient Safety Indicator 90 (PSI90) measure impact how clinical resources are allocated by prioritizing conditions that are simpler and less costly to prevent. Pressure injury prevention guidelines may be one of the more complex programs for hospitals to implement due to the financial investment in nursing time and technology. However, a quality improvement program focused around pressure injury prevention holds good value by tackling many of the tangential conditions caused by issues related to the decubitus patient and mobility, including fall injury, venous thromboembolism, catheter-associated urinary tract infection, and sepsis. Hospitals should reconsider their prioritization of different patient safety indicators, and The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services should create more focused payment incentives on harmful hospital-acquired conditions such as pressure injury that are independent of composite measures of harm, including PSI90.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document