Hospital-acquired pressure injury prevention in people with a BMI of 30.0 or higher: a scoping review protocol

2021 ◽  
Vol 29 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Victoria Marshall ◽  
Victoria Team ◽  
Carolina Weller
2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 44
Author(s):  
Sue Creehan ◽  
Joyce Black ◽  
Nick Santamaria ◽  
Jacqui Fletcher ◽  
Paulo Alves

Most acute care facilities are undergoing a major culture change and transforming into a high reliability organization focused on putting the patient experience first by delivering high quality, safe care. Reducing or eliminating hospital acquired conditions (HAC) fuels many quality improvement (QI) projects and successful reductions are attained when the support is rooted both in senior leadership and at the grassroots level. Yet each HAC requires a unique approach; specifically, pressure injury prevention programs have success with senior leaderships awareness and engagement in the complexities of the clinical and pathologic etiology of pressure injury development. This paper highlights for senior management the following evidence based key elements required for an organization to have a successful pressure injury prevention program: senior leadership engagement, a clinical champion, an interdisciplinary team, unit-based skin champions, nimble processes and access to evidence-based products.  


2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (5) ◽  
pp. 253-260
Author(s):  
Hossein Rafiei ◽  
Zohreh Vanaki ◽  
Eesa Mohammadi ◽  
Kazem Hosseinzadeh

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S241-S241
Author(s):  
Alicia Grubbs ◽  
Jocelyn J Mueller ◽  
Jenna C Kelly

Abstract Introduction Patients with dermal burns are at a greater risk of developing pressure injury secondary to critical illness and increased length of stay. Our burn center had four hospital-acquired pressure injuries, grade two or greater, in two months within our patient population. This incidence placed the burn unit in the top five units at our institution with the highest prevalence of hospital-acquired pressure injury. After discussion with nursing staff, we discovered a large variance in pressure injury prevention strategies, many of which were not focused on heel protection. Methods With rising prevalence, the burn team assembled a multidisciplinary team to combat the issue. The team consisted of day and night shift staff nurses, quality improvement nurse, physical therapist, and nursing management. We examined heel injury prevention evidence-based practice and then modified it for our unique patient population to develop a recommendation for best practice on our unit. The recommendations, affectionately known as the Hip Hip Heels Raised Campaign, include: Results To assess compliance to the new unit recommendations, patient positioning audits were completed before and after staff education. Prior to instruction and implementation of the campaign, compliance with heel elevation varied from 75–83%. With this information in mind, our goal was to achieve greater than 90% compliance during audits by January, with education beginning in mid- November. Our goal was met the week of December 27, 2018 and compliance has remained strong, averaging 92% implementation of heel elevation since campaign implementation. Conclusions Per the AHRQ, the average cost of a hospital acquired pressure injury averages $43,180. Our retrospective analysis for patients in our burn center discovered four pressure injuries, grade two or greater, in a two-month period prior to the campaign implementation. Over the five-month span since campaign application, only three pressure injuries have occurred in our patient population, a reduction of approximately seven pressure injuries. This reduction is the equivalence of $300,000 in patient care costs saved. Applicability of Research to Practice This model worked well for our unit and it is applicable to practice in the burn population because it is simple to implement and good for patient care outcomes.


2018 ◽  
Vol 23 (3) ◽  
pp. 123-127 ◽  
Author(s):  
William V Padula ◽  
Patricia M Davidson ◽  
Debra Jackson ◽  
Rachel Pedreira ◽  
Peter J Pronovost

Hospital-acquired conditions such as pressure injuries, falls, and infections are common, costly, and deadly. Addressing the simultaneous needs of evidence-based prevention guidelines for multiple conditions can be challenging for clinical teams. Current payment incentives created by The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services using the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality Patient Safety Indicator 90 (PSI90) measure impact how clinical resources are allocated by prioritizing conditions that are simpler and less costly to prevent. Pressure injury prevention guidelines may be one of the more complex programs for hospitals to implement due to the financial investment in nursing time and technology. However, a quality improvement program focused around pressure injury prevention holds good value by tackling many of the tangential conditions caused by issues related to the decubitus patient and mobility, including fall injury, venous thromboembolism, catheter-associated urinary tract infection, and sepsis. Hospitals should reconsider their prioritization of different patient safety indicators, and The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services should create more focused payment incentives on harmful hospital-acquired conditions such as pressure injury that are independent of composite measures of harm, including PSI90.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document