The posterior surgical treatment and outcomes of cervical spondylotic myelopathy: Why not C5 nerve root palsy occur

2021 ◽  
Vol 28 (6) ◽  
pp. 1167
Author(s):  
Ismail Yuce ◽  
Okan Kahyaoglu ◽  
Muzeyyen Ataseven ◽  
Halit Cavusoglu ◽  
Yunus Aydin
1996 ◽  
Vol 1 (6) ◽  
pp. E6 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hae-Dong Jho

Over the past few years, a microsurgical anterior foraminotomy technique has been developed by the author and used to achieve spinal cord decompression for the treatment of cervical spondylotic myelopathy. A 5 X 8-mm unilateral anterior foraminotomy is accomplished by resecting the uncovertebral joint via an anterior approach. Through the foraminotomy hole, the posterior osteophytes at the spinal cord canal are removed diagonally up to the beginning of the contralateral nerve root. To treat multilevel disease, a tunnel is made among the foraminotomy holes. This technique accomplishes widening of the spinal cord canal in the transverse and longitudinal axes by direct resection of the compressive lesions through the holes of unilateral anterior foraminotomies; however, it does not require bone fusion or postoperative immobilization. Postoperatively patients remain in the hospital overnight, and do not need to wear cervical braces. This new surgical technique has shown excellent clinical outcomes with fast recovery and adequate anatomical decompression in patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy. The surgical technique is reported and illustrated by two of the author's cases.


2003 ◽  
Vol 52 (1) ◽  
pp. 64-66
Author(s):  
Tosihiko Izumi ◽  
Shunji Matsunaga ◽  
Hikaru Sakamoto ◽  
Yasuomi Kawasoe ◽  
Jyun-ichi Kamizono ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 134 (8) ◽  
pp. 1045-1050 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tsukasa Kanchiku ◽  
Yasuaki Imajo ◽  
Hidenori Suzuki ◽  
Yuichiro Yoshida ◽  
Norihiro Nishida ◽  
...  

Neurosurgery ◽  
1999 ◽  
Vol 45 (3) ◽  
pp. 726-727
Author(s):  
Richard J. Edwards ◽  
Simon A. Cudlip ◽  
Anne J. Moore

2008 ◽  
Vol 17 (9) ◽  
pp. 710-714
Author(s):  
Takeshi Kino ◽  
Junya Hanakita ◽  
Toshiyuki Takahashi ◽  
Manabu Minami ◽  
Yoshihiro Kitahama ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 6 ◽  
pp. 205031211876619 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ziad A Audat ◽  
Mohammad D Fawareh ◽  
Ahmad M Radydeh ◽  
Moutasem M Obeidat ◽  
Mohannad A Odat ◽  
...  

Background: Cervical spondylotic myelopathy increases with age, but not all cases are symptomatic. It is usually diagnosed clinically and radiologically (X-ray and magnetic resonance imaging). Surgical treatment is indicated in severe symptomatic cases, while treatment controversy exists in the presence of less severe cases. Anterior and posterior approaches are generally used for decompression with no significant differences in the results of both. Methods: A total of 287 patients of cervical spondylotic myelopathy were treated at our hospital between January 2004 and December 2015. Only 140 patients were eligible for our study. They had at least 5 years of follow-up using full clinical scores and radiological evaluation. They were divided into two groups: group I with 73 patients (aged 23–79 years) underwent posterior decompression, lateral mass instrumentation, and fusion, while group II with 67 patients (aged 33–70 years) underwent anterior decompression, instrumentation, and fusion. Neck Disability Index, local score, and X-ray were used in the evaluation of the patients. Results: Preoperative mean ± standard deviation of Neck Disability Index of both the groups was 32.06 ± 6.33 and 29.88 ± 5.48, which improved in the last visit (>5 years) to 5.81 ± 7.39 and 2.94 ± 5.48 for groups I and II, respectively (p value <0.05). The local score of groups I and II was (P = 1, F = 21, G = 31, E = 19) and (P = 1, F = 12, G = 36, E = 18), which on discharge day improved to (P = 1, F = 4, G = 12, E = 55) and (P = 0, F = 3, G = 6, E = 58) at last follow-up, respectively. Fusion rate was nearly equal for both the groups during all the follow-up intervals and it was 91.1% and 91.7% in the last follow-up. Conclusion: There were no significant differences in the clinical and radiological results between the anterior and posterior approaches used in the surgical treatment of spondylotic cervical myelopathy. However, statistically significant results of Neck Disability Index of anterior approach were not clinically important and may be due to changes in the size and shape of the neck in group II.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document