The Role of Moral Disengagement in the Contagion of Pro-group Unethical Behavior

2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 (1) ◽  
pp. 13093
Author(s):  
Julie N.Y. Zhu ◽  
Long Wai Lam ◽  
Yolanda N. Li ◽  
Qi Shao
2019 ◽  
Vol 73 (1) ◽  
pp. 73-93 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ryan Fehr ◽  
Ashley Fulmer ◽  
Fong T. Keng‐Highberger

2019 ◽  
Vol 4 (7) ◽  
pp. 63-102
Author(s):  
Ali akbar Arjmandniya ◽  
Rezvan Hejazi ◽  
Albert Boghosian ◽  
sara Etemadi Eidgahi ◽  
◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 29 (5) ◽  
pp. 969-991
Author(s):  
Hillie Aaldering ◽  
Alfred Zerres ◽  
Wolfgang Steinel

Abstract While organizations strive for ethical conduct, the activity of negotiating offers strong temptations to employ unethical tactics and secure benefits for one’s own party. In four experiments, we examined the role of constituency communication in terms of their attitudes towards (un)ethical and competitive conduct on negotiators’ willingness and actual use of unethical tactics. We find that the mere presence of a constituency already increased representatives’ willingness to engage in unethical behavior (Experiment 1). More specifically, a constituency communicating liberal (vs. strict) attitudes toward unethical conduct helps negotiators to justify transgressions and morally disengage from their behavior, resulting in an increased use of unethical negotiation tactics (Experiment 2–3). Moreover, constituents’ endorsement of competitive strategies sufficed to increase moral disengagement and unethical behavior of representative negotiators in a similar fashion (Experiment 4ab). Our results caution organizational practice against advocating explicit unethical and even competitive tactics by constituents: it eases negotiators’ moral dilemma towards unethical conduct.


Author(s):  
Joerg Dietz ◽  
Emmanuelle P. Kleinlogel

We argue that research on employment discrimination can be enriched by studying it as unethical behavior. Using five moral principles, namely utilitarianism, distributive justice, righteousness of actions, virtuousness, and ethics of care, we illustrate the treatment of employment discrimination as a moral issue. An overarching theme in this discussion is that nondiscrimination is a fundamental human right. Next, the chapter illustrates how individual-difference variables that predict unethical behavior, such as moral disengagement and cognitive moral development, can contribute to advancing knowledge about employment discrimination. A similar argument is then presented for situational predictors of unethical behavior, such as obedience with requests from organizational authorities. Lastly, we discuss the role of classic interventions against unethical behavior, such as codes of conduct and the emphasis on fairness as a moral imperative, for combating employment discrimination.


2011 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jacob Y. Chan ◽  
Annis Lai Chu Fung ◽  
Manisha Rustagi ◽  
Courtney M. Ryan ◽  
Scott E. Bischoff
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document