The safety and the feasibility of mesh use in incarcerated inguinal hernia repair: A clinical study

Abstract Background: Congenital primary inguinal hernia is a common condition among children. Although much literature regarding inguinal hernia is available, large scale analysis are few, and rarely do they expand on gender difference or incarcerated hernias. Methods: Patients with unilateral or bilateral inguinal hernia who were admitted to our hospital and received open inguinal hernia repair (OIHR) or laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair (LIHR) under general anesthesia were included. Medical records were retrospectively collected and analyzed.Results: A total of 12190 patients were included in this study. The ratio of male to female was 4.8:1. There was a total of 10646 unilateral hernias (87.3%) and 1544 bilateral hernias (12.7%), with a corresponding ratio of 6.9:1. 12444 hernia repair surgeries, 11083 (89.1%) OIHR and 1361 (10.9%) LIHR, were held. OIHR had a shorter operative time than LIHR for all unilateral and female bilateral repair, unlike for bilateral male repair. There was no difference between OIHR and LIHR for ipsilateral recurrent hernia in males. There was a difference between OIHR and LIHR for metachronous contralateral hernia.Incarcerated inguinal hernia was associated with longer operative time, hospital stay and higher hospital costs. Females and patients under 1 year were more likely to present with incarcerated hernia.Conclusions: OIHR should be considered for male patients, especially for unilateral and complete inguinal hernia. LIHR is highly recommended for female patients. For incarcerated hernia, attention should be paid to patients under 1 year old, as they can be 60 times more susceptible, and females. Surgeons should also be aware of ovary hernias in females.

Download Full-text

Outcome of Desarda repair in incarcerated inguinal hernia repair: experience in university hospital

International Surgery Journal ◽

10.18203/2349-2902.isj20192371 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 6 (6) ◽

pp. 2084 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Avtar Pachauri ◽

Awanish Kumar

Keyword(s):

Inguinal Hernia ◽

Hernia Repair ◽

Inguinal Hernia Repair ◽

Low Cost ◽

Total Duration ◽

Recurrent Hernia ◽

University Hospital ◽

Complication Rates ◽

Incarcerated Inguinal Hernia ◽

Wall Stiffness

Background: Synthetic mesh based hernia repair is usually avoided in contaminated and dirty inguinal hernia repair to minimize the risk of infection. Desarda’s technique is a tissue based inguinal hernia repair method which avoids the use of prosthetic mesh. So this study was conducted with the aim to observe the outcome of Desarda’s technique in incarcerated inguinal hernia repair as an alternative procedure to mesh repair.Methods: This study was conducted in Emergency surgery department KGMU Lucknow. Total 30 patients with incarcerated inguinal hernia were included. Patients with recurrent hernia were excluded. Desarda repair was done in all patients. Patients were followed for 1 year to assess the outcome.Results: The mean age was 52±3 years. Mean operative time was 55±5 mins. Total duration of hospital stay was 4-16 days. Mild to moderate pain observed more frequently on 3rd and 7th post-operative day. Complication rates were found to be SSI (6%), seroma (3%), and recurrence (3%). Time taken to return to daily basic and work activities was 3 (3-5) and 15 days respectively. Patients’ subjective assessment of foreign body sensation done at 6th and 12th month follow up was found in 16% and 13% cases and that of abdominal wall stiffness in 23% followed by a reduction of upto 16% cases by 12th month.Conclusions: Desarda’s method is a safe, effective technique and may potentiate the use of tissue based repair for treating incarcerated, contaminated inguinal hernia repair. It has very low rate of recurrence and low cost of treatment.

Download Full-text

Laparoscopy Versus Open Incarcerated Inguinal Hernia Repair in Octogenarians

Surgical Laparoscopy Endoscopy & Percutaneous Techniques ◽

10.1097/sle.0000000000000629 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 29 (2) ◽

pp. 138-140

Author(s):

Jiangduosi Payiziwula ◽

Pei-Ji Zhao ◽

Amina Aierken ◽

Gang Yao ◽

Shadike Apaer ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Inguinal Hernia ◽

Hernia Repair ◽

Inguinal Hernia Repair ◽

Incarcerated Inguinal Hernia

Download Full-text

Characteristics and treatments for pediatric ordinary and incarcerated inguinal hernia based on gender: 12-year experiences from a single center

BMC Surgery ◽

10.1186/s12893-020-01039-5 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 21 (1) ◽

Author(s):

Kai Wang ◽

Sarah Siyin Tan ◽

Yue Xiao ◽

Zengmeng Wang ◽

Chunhui Peng ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Inguinal Hernia ◽

Hernia Repair ◽

Inguinal Hernia Repair ◽

Large Scale ◽

Operative Time ◽

Hospital Costs ◽

Recurrent Hernia ◽

Incarcerated Hernia ◽

Incarcerated Inguinal Hernia ◽

Large Scale Analysis

Abstract Background Congenital primary inguinal hernia is a common condition among children. Although much literature regarding inguinal hernia is available, large scale analysis are few, and rarely do they expand on gender difference or incarcerated hernias. Methods Patients with unilateral or bilateral inguinal hernia who were admitted to our hospital and received open inguinal hernia repair (OIHR) or laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair (LIHR) under general anesthesia were included. LIHR was performed using single-site laparoscopic percutaneous extraperitoneal closure (SLPEC). Medical records were retrospectively collected and analyzed. Results A total of 12,190 patients were included in this study. The ratio of male to female was 4.8:1. There was a total of 10,646 unilateral hernias (87.3%) and 1544 bilateral hernias (12.7%), with a corresponding ratio of 6.9:1. 12,444 hernia repair surgeries, 11,083 (89.1%) OIHR and 1361 (10.9%) LIHR, were held. OIHR had a shorter operative time than LIHR for all unilateral and female bilateral repair, unlike for bilateral male repair. There was no difference between OIHR and LIHR for ipsilateral recurrent hernia in males. There was a difference between OIHR and LIHR for metachronous contralateral hernia. Incarcerated inguinal hernia was associated with longer operative time, hospital stay and higher hospital costs. Females and patients under 1 year were more likely to present with incarcerated hernia. Conclusions OIHR should be considered for male patients, especially for unilateral and complete inguinal hernia. LIHR is highly recommended for female patients. For incarcerated hernia, attention should be paid to patients under 1 year old, as they can be 60 times more susceptible, and females. Surgeons should also be aware of ovary hernias in females.

Download Full-text

Characteristics and Treatments for Pediatric Ordinary and Incarcerated Inguinal Hernia Based on Gender: 12-Year Experiences from a Single Center

10.21203/rs.3.rs-35681/v2 ◽

2020 ◽

Author(s):

Kai Wang ◽

Sarah Siyin Tan ◽

Yue Xiao ◽

Zengmeng Wang ◽

Chunhui Peng ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Inguinal Hernia ◽

Hernia Repair ◽

Inguinal Hernia Repair ◽

Operative Time ◽

Large Population ◽

Hospital Costs ◽

Recurrent Hernia ◽

Incarcerated Hernia ◽

Incarcerated Inguinal Hernia ◽

Different Characteristics

Abstract Background: To describe the different characteristics of pediatric inguinal hernia in a large population for both genders based on our 12-year experience, and to accordingly recommend one of the two commonly used methods of hernia repair: the traditional open inguinal hernia repair (OIHR) and laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair (LIHR). An additional goal was to describe the characteristics of incarcerated inguinal hernia.Methods: Patients with unilateral or bilateral inguinal hernia who were admitted to our hospital and received OIHR or LIHR under general anesthesia were included. Medical records were retrospectively collected and analyzed.Results: A total of 12190 patients were included in this study. The ratio of male to female was 4.8:1. There was a total of 10646 unilateral hernias (87.3%) and 1544 bilateral hernias (12.7%), with a corresponding ratio of 6.9:1. 12444 hernia repair surgeries, 11083 (89.1%) OIHR and 1361 (10.9%) LIHR, were held. OIHR had a shorter operative time than LIHR for all unilateral and female bilateral repair, unlike for bilateral male repair. There was no difference between OIHR and LIHR for ipsilateral recurrent hernia in males. There was a difference between OIHR and LIHR for metachronous contralateral hernia.Incarcerated inguinal hernia was associated with longer operative time, hospital stay and higher hospital costs. Males and patients under 1 year were more likely to present with incarcerated hernia.Conclusions: OIHR should be considered for male patients, especially for unilateral and complete inguinal hernia. LIHR is highly recommended for female patients. For incarcerated hernia, attention should be paid to patients under 1 year old, as they can be 60 times more susceptible, and females. Surgeons should also be aware of ovary hernias in females.

Download Full-text

Characteristics and Treatments for Pediatric Ordinary and Incarcerated Inguinal Hernia Based on Gender: 12-Year Experiences from a Single Center

10.21203/rs.3.rs-35681/v4 ◽

2020 ◽

Author(s):

Kai Wang ◽

Sarah Siyin Tan ◽

Yue Xiao ◽

Zengmeng Wang ◽

Chunhui Peng ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Inguinal Hernia ◽

Hernia Repair ◽

Inguinal Hernia Repair ◽

Large Scale ◽

Operative Time ◽

Hospital Costs ◽

Recurrent Hernia ◽

Incarcerated Hernia ◽

Incarcerated Inguinal Hernia ◽

Large Scale Analysis

Abstract Background: Congenital primary inguinal hernia is a common condition among children. Although much literature regarding inguinal hernia is available, large scale analysis are few, and rarely do they expand on gender difference or incarcerated hernias. Methods: Patients with unilateral or bilateral inguinal hernia who were admitted to our hospital and received open inguinal hernia repair (OIHR) or laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair (LIHR) under general anesthesia were included. LIHR was performed using single-site laparoscopic percutaneous extraperitoneal closure (SLPEC). Medical records were retrospectively collected and analyzed. Results: A total of 12190 patients were included in this study. The ratio of male to female was 4.8:1. There was a total of 10646 unilateral hernias (87.3%) and 1544 bilateral hernias (12.7%), with a corresponding ratio of 6.9:1. 12444 hernia repair surgeries, 11083 (89.1%) OIHR and 1361 (10.9%) LIHR, were held. OIHR had a shorter operative time than LIHR for all unilateral and female bilateral repair, unlike for bilateral male repair. There was no difference between OIHR and LIHR for ipsilateral recurrent hernia in males. There was a difference between OIHR and LIHR for metachronous contralateral hernia. Incarcerated inguinal hernia was associated with longer operative time, hospital stay and higher hospital costs. Females and patients under 1 year were more likely to present with incarcerated hernia. Conclusions: OIHR should be considered for male patients, especially for unilateral and complete inguinal hernia. LIHR is highly recommended for female patients. For incarcerated hernia, attention should be paid to patients under 1 year old, as they can be 60 times more susceptible, and females. Surgeons should also be aware of ovary hernias in females.

Download Full-text