Quality Assessment in Systematic Reviews: A Literature Review of Health Economic Evaluation of Hepatitis Studies

2017 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 52-61
Author(s):  
Quang Vinh Tran ◽  
Phuong Hong Le ◽  
Trung Quang Vo
Keyword(s):  
Health Economic ◽  
Economic Evaluation ◽  
Literature Review ◽  
Quality Assessment ◽  
Systematic Reviews ◽  
Health Economic Evaluation

scholarly journals A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW OF HEPATITIS VIRUS REVIEW STUDIES: A CASE OF HEALTH ECONOMIC EVALUATION ANALYSIS

2017 ◽  
Vol 9 (5) ◽  
pp. 114
Author(s):  
Phuong Hong Le ◽  
Quang Vinh Tran ◽  
Trung Quang Vo
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Health Economic ◽  
Economic Evaluation ◽  
Systematic Reviews ◽  
Hepatitis Virus ◽  
Health Economic Evaluation ◽  
Current Evidence ◽  
Inclusion Criteria ◽  
Publication Period

Objective: Systematic reviews of economic analysis are necessary for assessing reports and making a decision. A systematic review of systematic reviews is mean of summarizing the current evidence across specialties of the same or very similar intervention, to provide a synthesis treatment effect. The aim of this study was to explore and to assess the quality of systematic reviews conducted hepatitis economic evaluation.Methods: This study was designed as a systematic review following the AMSTAR guideline through Medline, Cochrane, and Science Direct databases. It was scoped in publication period of 2001 and 2016 in international journals. The quality assessment of the included studies was based on AMSTAR checklist. Two authors did the appreciation independently and all the different results were solved by discussion to give the conclusion.Results: 851 publications found, only 25 studies of those met the inclusion criteria. These studies consisted of 5 studies for vaccination and 20 for non-vaccination. There were only 16% (n=4) based on PRISMA guideline; and twenty-one studies (64%) were not showing about the method of the systematic review or not based on any guideline. Only three articles has published in 2016 with a high standard.Conclusion: According to the results of the appraisal AMSTAR checklist, this review shows clearly the current situation and an urgent need for an increase of quality of hepatitis virus review studies based on health economic evaluation.

scholarly journals An overview of the characteristics and quality assessment criteria in systematic review of pharmacoeconomics

PLoS ONE ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (2) ◽  
pp. e0246080
Author(s):  
Chen Min ◽  
Mi Xue ◽  
Fei Haotian ◽  
Li Jialian ◽  
Zhang Lingli
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Health Economic ◽  
Economic Evaluation ◽  
Quality Assessment ◽  
Systematic Reviews ◽  
Methodological Quality ◽  
Biomedical Literature ◽  
Assessment Criteria ◽  
Economic Research

Background The systematic review of economic evaluations plays a critical role in making well-informed decisions about competing healthcare interventions. The quality of these systematic reviews varies due to the lack of internationally recognized methodological evaluation standards. Methods Nine English and Chinese databases including the Cochrane Library, PubMed, EMbase (Ovid), NHS economic evaluation database (NHSEED) (Ovid), Health Technology Assessment (HTA) database, Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), WangFang, VIP Chinese Science & Technology Periodicals (VIP) and Chinese Biomedical Literature Database (CBM) were searched. Two reviewers independently screened studies and extracted data. The methodological quality of the literature was measured with modified AMSTAR. Data were narrative synthesized. Results 165 systematic reviews were included. The overall methodological quality of the literature was moderate according to the AMSTAR scale. In these articles, thirteen quality assessment tools and 32 author self-defined criteria were used. The three most widely used tools were the Drummond checklist (19.4%), the BMJ checklist (15.8%), the Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS) statement (12.7%). Others included the Quality of Health Economic Studies (QHES), the Consensus on Health Economic Criteria (CHEC), the checklist of Center for Reviews and Dissemination (CRD), the Philips checklist, the World Health Organization (WHO) checklist, the checklist of Critical Appraisal Skills Program (CASP), the Pediatric Quality Appraisal Questionnaire (PQAQ), the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) checklist, Spanish and Chinese guidelines. The quantitative scales used in these literature were the QHES and PQAQ. Conclusions Evidence showed that pharmacoeconomic systematic reviews’ methodology remained to be improved, and the quality assessment criteria were gradually unified. Multiple scales can be used in combination to evaluate the quality of economic research in different settings and types.

2200-PUB: Application of Data Envelopment Analysis in Health Economic Evaluation of Insulin Pump Treatment during Perioperative Period

Diabetes ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 69 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 2200-PUB
Author(s):  
WEI SONG ◽  
JIANXUAN WEN ◽  
LING ZHAO ◽  
GUANJIE FAN ◽  
MENG LUO ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Health Economic ◽  
Economic Evaluation ◽  
Data Envelopment Analysis ◽  
Insulin Pump ◽  
Health Economic Evaluation ◽  
Perioperative Period ◽  
Data Envelopment

scholarly journals Health Economic Evaluation of Patients with Colorectal Liver Metastases Randomized to ALPPS or TSH - Analysis from the LIGRO Trial

HPB ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 23 ◽  
pp. S99
Author(s):  
K. Hasselgren ◽  
M. Henriksson ◽  
B. Røsok ◽  
P. Larsen ◽  
E. Sparrelid ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Health Economic ◽  
Economic Evaluation ◽  
Liver Metastases ◽  
Colorectal Liver Metastases ◽  
Health Economic Evaluation
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document