scholarly journals Discourse Analysis and Development of English Listening for Non-English Majors in China

2015 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Yinxiu Ji
2017 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 149
Author(s):  
Yanwei Nie

<em>Reading is a primary avenue of language input and the spread of knowledge. Some EFL learners focus on vocabulary and grammar, but ignore the broader relationship between words, sentences and paragraphs in reading. Due to this, it is of great necessity to introduce discourse analysis to English reading teaching because of its potential to improve students’ discourse awareness and reading comprehension. While discourse analysis covers three aspects, structure of discourse, cohesion and coherence, and background information and context, this paper aimed to identify the ideal focus of discourse-based English reading teaching and to uncover pedagogical differences between English majors and non-English majors in Chinese universities. The research findings show that Chinese students have a good sense of discourse in general, and the main difference between English majors and non-English majors is that English majors are more inclined to grasp the main idea by analyzing the structure of discourse. The pedagogical implication is that if discourse-based reading teaching is applied for non-English major students, it should focus more on reading strategies related to the structure of discourse.</em>


2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (6) ◽  
pp. 741
Author(s):  
Fan Wang

The dictation text has always been a weak point for our students in Test for English Majors-4. Discourse teaching is an indispensable part of listening teaching. This paper mainly discusses the pattern analysis and strategy methods in the four dictation text listening discourse. The content includes TEM-4 listening examination requirements, dictation text discourse analysis, the answer steps and strategy methods in dictation text. The research of this subject is designed to help students perform better in their listening exam.


2019 ◽  
Vol 42 ◽  
Author(s):  
Giulia Frezza ◽  
Pierluigi Zoccolotti

Abstract The convincing argument that Brette makes for the neural coding metaphor as imposing one view of brain behavior can be further explained through discourse analysis. Instead of a unified view, we argue, the coding metaphor's plasticity, versatility, and robustness throughout time explain its success and conventionalization to the point that its rhetoric became overlooked.


2002 ◽  
Vol 47 (2) ◽  
pp. 202-205
Author(s):  
Richard J. Gerrig
Keyword(s):  

1983 ◽  
Vol 28 (1) ◽  
pp. 60-61
Author(s):  
Dell Hymes

2008 ◽  
Author(s):  
Linda M. McMullen
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document