scholarly journals Pre-seasonal prophylactic treatment in Japanese cedar pollinosis

Author(s):  
Yoshiaki Kitamura ◽  
Hiroyuki Mizuguchi ◽  
Hiroyuki Fukui ◽  
Noriaki Takeda
2007 ◽  
Vol 100 (2) ◽  
pp. 137-144 ◽  
Author(s):  
Katsumi Masuda ◽  
Tamotsu Harada ◽  
Tsuyoshi Yoshihiro ◽  
Yukiyoshi Hyo ◽  
Kenji Fukutsuji ◽  
...  

2001 ◽  
Vol 94 (6) ◽  
pp. 567-573
Author(s):  
Nobuo OHTA ◽  
Naoko KASAJIMA ◽  
Masaru AOYAGI ◽  
Kazutoshi INAMURA ◽  
Seigi GON ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Yasuda Makoto ◽  
Toshihiro Kuremoto ◽  
Yoko Muto ◽  
Takemitsu Hama ◽  
Hironori Sakurai ◽  
...  

2011 ◽  
Vol 50 (2) ◽  
pp. 136-142
Author(s):  
Shuji Isogawa ◽  
Ryuzo Toriya ◽  
Fumiaki Tanaka ◽  
Takafumi Toriya ◽  
Masatake Oiso ◽  
...  

2007 ◽  
Vol 100 (11) ◽  
pp. 935-945
Author(s):  
Takaki Miwa ◽  
Toshiaki Tsukatani ◽  
Naoki Uramoto ◽  
Tomokazu Yoshizaki ◽  
Makoto Ito ◽  
...  

2006 ◽  
Vol 99 (6) ◽  
pp. 501-508 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nobuo Ohta ◽  
Shinichi Sakurai ◽  
Hiroshi Yoshitake ◽  
Masaru Aoyagi

2019 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 11
Author(s):  
Takenori Haruna ◽  
Shin Kariya ◽  
Takaya Higaki ◽  
Sei-ichiro Makihara ◽  
Kengo Kanai ◽  
...  

: Prophylactic treatment with intranasal corticosteroids is effective for pollen-induced seasonal allergic rhinitis. However, the appropriate time to start this treatment remains unclear. We performed a double-blinded, randomized, placebo-controlled trial. Starting on February 1, 2014, patients with Japanese cedar pollinosis received either fluticasone furoate nasal spray (FFNS) for 8 weeks (Group A: n = 24), placebo nasal spray for 2 weeks followed by FFNS for 6 weeks (Group B: n = 23), or placebo for 4 weeks followed by FFNS for 4 weeks (Group C: n = 23). The primary endpoint was comparison of the total naso-ocular symptom score (TSS). Secondary endpoints including the increment cost effective ratio (ICER) were also determined. Continuous pollen dispersion began on the 24th of February. Therefore, Group A and Group B received 3-weeks and 1-week of prophylactic treatment, respectively, whereas Group C received post-onset treatment. During the peak pollen-dispersal period, significant differences in TSS were seen between the groups, particularly between Group A and C. The ICER of Group B vs. Group C was lower than that of Group A vs. Group C. These results suggest that long-term prophylactic treatment with FFNS is clinically the most potent treatment, whereas short-term prophylactic treatment is cost effective for pollen-induced allergic rhinitis.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document