intranasal corticosteroids
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

271
(FIVE YEARS 52)

H-INDEX

30
(FIVE YEARS 2)

2021 ◽  
Vol 18 (4) ◽  
pp. 795-799
Author(s):  
Paroma Arefin ◽  
Md Shehan Habib ◽  
Mohammad Mostafa ◽  
Dipankar Chakraborty ◽  
reebash Chandra Bhattacharjee ◽  
...  

Fexofenadine HCl is a second-generation antihistamine which is commonly used for allergic disorders. But it has low bioavailability. Intranasal corticosteroids (INCs) and Immunotherapy and Allergen Specific Immunotherapy (ASIT) are now commonly being suggested for the treatment of allergic disorders. Despite the fact that current treatment alternatives have been in use for decades, patient quality of life has remained static. The treatment options are not much explored for their respective adverse effects. Therefore, they are in desperate need of research. Fexofenadine HCl is available in the form of a suspension, tablet, or capsule. In our current study, we have explored whether microspheres can be the perfect dosage form of Fexofenadine HCl to treat allergic disorders considering the pharmacokinetics of the drug, available dosage forms options and the probable side effects of the current therapies.


2021 ◽  
pp. 118-124
Author(s):  
K. S. Pavlova ◽  
D. S. Mdinaradze

Allergic rhinitis (AR) is one of the most common allergic diseases, especially in economically developed countries, including Russia. The main goal of AR therapy is the control achievement over the disease symptoms, the minimizing of the future exacerbations risks and side effects. Antihistamines and glucocorticosteroids are the main classes of medicines used in all allergic diseases, including AR. According to the Federal Clinical Guidelines for Allergic rhinitis the use of the intranasal corticosteroids in combination with antihistamines is recommended on the second stage of therapy and higher. Both classes of medicines have a complementary effect on the allergic inflammation pathogenesis main stages. The intranasal corticosteroids and antihistamines using allows the delivery of the medicines to the allergic inflammation area directly. Modern intranasal corticosteroids have a high affinity that provides the high efficacy in the low concentrations using and the insignificant systemic bioavailability. The review presents the key characteristics of the olopatadine and mometasone furoate nasal spray in a fixed combination, which registered in the Russian Federation recently. This combination is recommend for use in adults and children over 12 y.o. with allergic rhinitis. The pharmacological characteristics of the nasal spray components including the action mechanism described. The main clinical studies results presented, that confirmed the high efficacy and safety of olopatadine/mometasone furoate combination in AR patients. The olopatadine and mometasone furoate fixed combination ensures the rapid onset and the long-lasting effect with minimal adverse events risks that increases compliance and leads to the control achievement over the AR symptoms.


2021 ◽  
pp. 000348942110549
Author(s):  
Rehab Talat ◽  
Isabelle Gengler ◽  
Katie M. Phillips ◽  
David S. Caradonna ◽  
Stacey T. Gray ◽  
...  

Background: Pathophysiology-targeting treatments exist for aspirin-exacerbated respiratory disease (AERD) through aspirin desensitization and biologics, such as dupilumab. With increasing attention paid to these treatments, which may be associated with significant side effects and/or cost, there is little description of chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) response to treatment with intranasal corticosteroids and saline irrigations in AERD. Objective: To determine the effect of intranasal budesonide irrigations for the treatment of CRSwNP in AERD. Methods: This is an observational study of 14 AERD patients presenting to a rhinology clinic for CRS who were treated with twice daily high volume, low pressure irrigations with 240 mL of saline to which a 0.5 mg/2 mL respule of budesonide was added. All participants completed a 22-item Sinonasal Outcome Test (SNOT-22) at enrollment and at follow up 1 to 6 months later. Polyp scores were also calculated at each time point. Results: SNOT-22 scores ranged from 26 to 98 (median: 40.5) at enrollment and 3 to 85 (median: 38.5) at follow-up. Polyp scores ranged from 2 to 6 (median: 4) at enrollment at 0 to 6 (median: 2) at follow-up. Over the treatment period, change in SNOT-22 score ranged from −38 to 16 (median: −18) and change in polyp score ranged from −2 to 0 (median: −0.5). Approximately 57% of participants experienced at least 1 minimal clinically important difference in SNOT-22 score and 21% of participants had a SNOT-22 score <20 at follow-up. Conclusion: Medical management with intranasal corticosteroids and saline irrigations alone leads to significant improvement in sinonasal symptomatology in a subset of AERD.


2021 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Eli O. Meltzer ◽  
Nelson Augusto Rosario ◽  
Hugo Van Bever ◽  
Luiz Lucio

AbstractAllergic rhinitis (AR) is the most common undiagnosed chronic condition in children. Moderate/severe AR symptoms significantly impair quality of life, and cause sleep disruption, absenteeism and decreased productivity. Additionally, untreated AR predisposes children to asthma and other chronic conditions. Although intranasal corticosteroids are the most effective pharmacologic treatment for AR, oral antihistamines are often preferred. First-generation antihistamines may be chosen to relieve AR symptoms as they are inexpensive and widely available; however, they cause sedative and cardiovascular negative effects due to poor receptor selectivity. Therefore, second-generation antihistamines were developed to reduce adverse effects while retaining efficacy. There are fewer clinical trials in children than adults, therefore, efficacy and safety data is limited, particularly in children under 6 years, highlighting the need to generate these data in young children with AR. Fexofenadine, a highly selective second-generation antihistamine, effectively alleviates symptoms of AR, is non-sedating due to decreased blood–brain barrier permeability, and is devoid of cardiovascular side effects. Importantly, fexofenadine relieves the ocular symptoms of allergic conjunctivitis, which occur concomitantly with AR, improving quality of life. Overall, fexofenadine displays a favorable safety profile and results in greater treatment satisfaction in children compared with other second-generation antihistamines. This review aimed to evaluate and compare the safety and efficacy of fexofenadine with other available first- and second-generation antihistamines in children with AR.


2021 ◽  
Vol 42 (6) ◽  
pp. 450-460 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dana V. Wallace

Background: The management of chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) is evolving, with an emphasis on treating the underlying type 2 inflammation. Objective: The objective was to summarize the updated evidence-based medical and surgical treatment recommendations for CRSwNP, including the position of biologics in the treatment algorithm. Methods: This review compared and contrasted the therapeutic recommendations presented by the European Position Paper on Rhinosinusitis and Nasal Polyps 2020 and the International Consensus Statement on Allergy and Rhinology: Rhinosinusitis 2021. Results: The long-term use of intranasal corticosteroids and the short-term use of oral corticosteroids are strongly recommended, whereas corticosteroid-eluting implants are considered an option. Although the use of saline solution rinses is recommended, there is uncertainty as to whether irrigation is more effective than sprays. Oral aspirin (ASA) desensitization, followed by ASA ≥ 300 mg daily for patients with ASA-exacerbated respiratory disease may be considered. In general, the use of antifungal agents offers no benefit and potential harm. Although the use of oral antibiotics for an acute exacerbation is still debated, oral and topical antibiotics are discouraged for subacute or chronic use. Antileukotrienes are inferior to intranasal corticosteroids and are unlikely to provide added benefit when used concomitantly. It is unlikely that the benefit of oral antihistamines and decongestants outweigh the potential harm. Dupilumab is recommended for severe CRSwNP when consensus-determined criteria are met. Omalizumab may be an option with concomitant poorly controlled asthma. Mepolizumab and reslizumab may be used, particularly in patients with concomitant uncontrolled asthma. In allergic fungal rhinosinusitis, oral and topical antifungals, antileukotrienes, allergen immunotherapy, and omalizumab are therapeutic options. Although surgical intervention is recognized to be of benefit for CRSwNP, there are no evidence-based criteria to indicate when maximum medical treatment has failed. Conclusion: An evidence-based CRSwNP treatment algorithm for when to recommend surgery and/or initiate or discontinue biologics to maximize quality of life and cost-effectiveness is still lacking.


Antioxidants ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (10) ◽  
pp. 1524
Author(s):  
Suhyun Lim ◽  
Iwah Jeong ◽  
Jonghyeok Cho ◽  
Chaewon Shin ◽  
Kwan-Il Kim ◽  
...  

More than 500 million people suffer from allergic rhinitis (AR) in the world. Current treatments include oral antihistamines and intranasal corticosteroids; however, they often cause side effects and are unsuitable for long-term exposure. Natural products could work as a feasible alternative, and this study aimed to review the efficacies and mechanisms of natural substances in AR therapies by examining previous literature. Fifty-seven studies were collected and classified into plants, fungi, and minerals decoction; clinical trials were organized separately. The majority of the natural products showed their efficacies by two mechanisms: anti-inflammation regulating diverse mediators and anti-oxidation controlling the activity of nuclear factor kappa-light-chain-enhancer of activated B cells (NFκB) pathway stimulated by reactive oxygen species (ROS). The main AR factors modified by natural products included interleukin (IL)-4, IL-5, IL-13, interferon-gamma (IFN-γ), tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), cyclooxygenase 2 (COX-2), and phospho-ERK1/2 (p-ERK1/2). Although further studies are required to verify their efficacies and safeties, natural products can significantly contribute to the treatment of AR.


2021 ◽  
Vol Volume 14 ◽  
pp. 1093-1104
Author(s):  
Peter T Daley-Yates ◽  
Désirée Larenas-Linnemann ◽  
Chaitanya Bhargave ◽  
Manish Verma

Author(s):  
N Seymour ◽  
M Robinson ◽  
D Richardson ◽  
H Mohammed ◽  
D Williams ◽  
...  

Abstract Background There are significant drug–drug interactions between human immunodeficiency virus antiretroviral therapy and intranasal steroids, leading to high serum concentrations of iatrogenic steroids and subsequently Cushing's syndrome. Method All articles in the literature on cases of intranasal steroid and antiretroviral therapy interactions were reviewed. Full-length manuscripts were analysed and the relevant data were extracted. Results A literature search and further cross-referencing yielded a total of seven reports on drug–drug interactions of intranasal corticosteroids and human immunodeficiency virus protease inhibitors, published between 1999 and 2019. Conclusion The use of potent steroids metabolised via CYP3A4, such as fluticasone and budesonide, are not recommended for patients taking ritonavir or cobicistat. Mometasone should be used cautiously with ritonavir because of pharmacokinetic similarities to fluticasone. There was a delayed onset of symptoms in many cases, most likely due to the relatively lower systemic bioavailability of intranasal fluticasone.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document