The meaning of life in medicine: non-religious spiritual care in Japan

2017 ◽  
Vol 5 (4) ◽  
pp. 527 ◽  
Author(s):  
Clark Chilson

Within the context of a growing global interest in the role of spirituality in medicine, “spiritual care” has developed as a form of patient-centered care that addresses existential suffering. This paper provides an introduction to spiritual care in Japan. On the basis of publications by leading Japanese authors on spiritual care, it first shows how spiritual care developed in Japan and how it is understood as a way of providing meaning and comfort distinct from “religious care.” Then it introduces some common methods used for spiritual care in Japan. Overall, it argues that the way spiritual care is conceptualized and offered in Japan provides suggestions for how spiritual care might be offered to patients who are non-religious and do not see themselves as “spiritual”.

Author(s):  
Salma Shickh ◽  
◽  
Sara A. Rafferty ◽  
Marc Clausen ◽  
Rita Kodida ◽  
...  

2011 ◽  
Vol 17 (4) ◽  
pp. 211-218 ◽  
Author(s):  
Claire F. Snyder ◽  
Albert W. Wu ◽  
Robert S. Miller ◽  
Roxanne E. Jensen ◽  
Elissa T. Bantug ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 133 ◽  
pp. 45-52 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elisa Giulia Liberati ◽  
Mara Gorli ◽  
Lorenzo Moja ◽  
Laura Galuppo ◽  
Silvio Ripamonti ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 32 (30_suppl) ◽  
pp. 50-50
Author(s):  
Manasi A. Tirodkar ◽  
Sarah Hudson Scholle

50 Background: The patient-centered medical home (PCMH) model of care is being widely adopted as a way to provide accessible, proactive, coordinated care and self-care through primary care practices. During active treatment for cancer, the oncology practice is often the primary setting supporting the patient and coordinating cancer treatment. For this project, we are implementing a Patient-centered Oncology Care model in five oncology practices and evaluating the impact on cost, quality, and patient experiences. Methods: To determine the structures and processes present in the practices at baseline, we conducted a self-assessment on the standards, followed with an on-site “audit” for compliance with the standards. To get a sense for organizational culture and motivation to change, we conducted site visits which included interviews with providers, staff and patients and observation of clinical encounters and workflow. Results: Among the highest priority structures and processes, the most common were telephone triage, symptom management, advance care planning, and the use of evidence-based guidelines. The least common were patient/family orientation, availability of same day appointments, discussion and documentation of goals of therapy, symptom assessment, and tracking of appointments. All of the practices had made patient-centered care a priority and staff were motivated to change. There was variation in the way providers and the care team used health information technology during clinical workflow. There was also variation in which staff coordinated care for patients and whether or not financial counseling was offered. All of the practices stated that they needed to work on implementing survivorship care planning, shared decision-making, and patient engagement in quality improvement and practice transformation Conclusions: The pilot oncology practices have many structures and processes in common. However, there is little standardization within practices in the way these processes are established and documented. Practices vary in how they are implementing patient-centered care processes. However, with motivation to change, staff and providers are actively engaged in the transformation process.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document