scholarly journals Clinical evaluation of KPC by the double blind test against infection and postoperative inflammation in oral surgery

1976 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
pp. 110-130
Author(s):  
Takenori ISHIKAWA ◽  
Yoshiaki WATANABE ◽  
Norio MORISAWA ◽  
Akihiro TANAKA ◽  
Hiroshi INUI ◽  
...  
1974 ◽  
Vol 20 (5) ◽  
pp. 512-516
Author(s):  
Takeshi KATSUKI ◽  
Kazuo NAKAZIMA ◽  
Kazuyuki NOUTOMI ◽  
Ryuichi ATSUMI ◽  
Yukio UMEZAKI ◽  
...  

1976 ◽  
Vol 22 (2) ◽  
pp. 244-251
Author(s):  
Kenichi MICHI ◽  
Morio TOZUKA ◽  
Hiroshi IWAKI ◽  
Masao NAGUMO ◽  
Yoichi KURACHI ◽  
...  

1976 ◽  
Vol 22 (2) ◽  
pp. 235-243
Author(s):  
Kinya KUROYANAGI ◽  
Jiro SASAKI ◽  
Katsuhiro NAKAZAWA ◽  
Shojiro TAKAHASHI ◽  
Kenichi MICHI ◽  
...  

1976 ◽  
Vol 22 (2) ◽  
pp. 252-258
Author(s):  
Jiro SASAKI ◽  
Katsuhiro NAKAZAWA ◽  
Kinya KUROYANAGI ◽  
Shojiro TAKAHASHI ◽  
Kenichi MICHI ◽  
...  

Biology ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (6) ◽  
pp. 517
Author(s):  
Shoko Kure ◽  
Shinya Iida ◽  
Marina Yamada ◽  
Hiroyuki Takei ◽  
Naoyuki Yamashita ◽  
...  

Background: Breast cancer is a leading cause of cancer death worldwide. Several studies have demonstrated that dogs can sniff and detect cancer in the breath or urine sample of a patient. This study aims to assess whether the urine sample can be used for breast cancer screening by its fingerprints of volatile organic compounds using a single trained sniffer dog. This is a preliminary study for developing the “electronic nose” for cancer screening. Methods: A nine-year-old female Labrador Retriever was trained to identify cancer from urine samples of breast cancer patients. Urine samples from patients histologically diagnosed with primary breast cancer, those with non-breast malignant diseases, and healthy volunteers were obtained, and a double-blind test was performed. Total of 40 patients with breast cancer, 142 patients with non-breast malignant diseases, and 18 healthy volunteers were enrolled, and their urine samples were collected. Results: In 40 times out of 40 runs of a double-blind test, the trained dog could correctly identify urine samples of breast cancer patients. Sensitivity and specificity of this breast cancer detection method using dog sniffing were both 100%. Conclusions: The trained dog in this study could accurately detect breast cancer from urine samples of breast cancer patients. These results indicate the feasibility of a method to detect breast cancer from urine samples using dog sniffing in the diagnosis of breast cancer. Although the methodological standardization is still an issue to be discussed, the current result warrants further study for developing a new breast cancer screening method based on volatile organic compounds in urine samples.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document