scholarly journals A Roadmap for the Student Pursuing a Career in Pediatric Emergency Medicine

2019 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
pp. 12-17
Author(s):  
Aaron Leetch ◽  
Joshua Glasser ◽  
Dale Woolridge

Introduction: Three pathways are available to students considering a pediatric emergency medicine (PEM) career: pediatric residency followed by PEM fellowship (Peds-PEM); emergency medicine residency followed by PEM fellowship (EM-PEM); and combined EM and pediatrics residency (EM&Peds). Questions regarding differences between the training pathways are common among medical students. We present a comparative analysis of training pathways highlighting major curricular differences to aid in students’ understanding of these training options. Methods: All currently credentialed training programs for each pathway with curricula published on their websites were included. We analyzed dedicated educational units (EU) core to all three pathways: emergency department (ED), pediatric-only ED, critical care, and research. Minimum requirements for primary residencies were assumed for fellowship trainees. Results: Of the 75 Peds-PEM, 34 EM-PEM, and 4 EM&Peds programs screened, 85% of Peds-PEM and EM-PEM and all EM&Peds program curricula were available for analysis. Average Peds-PEM EUs were 20.4 EM, 20.1 pediatric-only EM, 5.8 critical care, and 9.0 research. Average EM-PEM EUs were 33.2 EM, 18.3 pediatric-only EM, 6.5 critical care, and 3.3 research. Average EM&Peds EUs were 26.1 EM, 8.0 pediatric-only EM, 10.0 critical care, and 0.3 research. Conclusion: All three pathways exceed pediatric-focused training required for EM or pediatric residency. Peds-PEM has the most research EUs, EM-PEM the most EM EUs, and EM&Peds the most critical care EUs. All prepare graduates for a pediatric emergency medicine career. Understanding the difference in emphasis between pathways can inform students to select the best pathway for their own careers.

CJEM ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 20 (3) ◽  
pp. 448-452
Author(s):  
Ian G. Stiell ◽  
Jeffrey J. Perry ◽  
Jamie Brehaut ◽  
Erica Brown ◽  
Janet A. Curran ◽  
...  

AbstractObjectiveThe objective of Panel 2b was to present an overview of and recommendations for the conduct of implementation trials and multicentre studies in emergency medicine.MethodsPanel members engaged methodologists to discuss the design and conduct of implementation and multicentre studies. We also conducted semi-structured interviews with 37 Canadian adult and pediatric emergency medicine researchers to elicit barriers and facilitators to conducting these kinds of studies.ResultsResponses were organized by themes, and, based on these responses, recommendations were developed and refined in an iterative fashion by panel members.ConclusionsWe offer eight recommendations to facilitate multicentre clinical and implementation studies, along with guidance for conducting implementation research in the emergency department. Recommendations for multicentre studies reflect the importance of local study investigators and champions, requirements for research infrastructure and staffing, and the cooperation and communication between the coordinating centre and participating sites.


2008 ◽  
Vol 7 (7) ◽  
pp. 774-778 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vincent P Tamariz ◽  
Susan Fuchs ◽  
Jill M Baren ◽  
Emily S Pollack ◽  
Joseph Kim ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document