Comparison of Proximal Femur Locking Compression Plate and Intramedullary Nailing in the Treatment of Sub-Trochanteric Fractures

2019 ◽  
Vol In Press (In Press) ◽  
Author(s):  
Karim Pisoude ◽  
Omid Elahifar ◽  
Mohammad Bagher Sohrabi ◽  
Javad Khajemozafari
Keyword(s):  
Intramedullary Nailing ◽  
Proximal Femur ◽  
Locking Compression Plate ◽  
Trochanteric Fractures ◽  
Compression Plate

scholarly journals Clinical Characteristics and Economic Analysis of Intramedullary Nailing Versus Plate and Screws for Open Distal Tibial Fractures: a Retrospective Study

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yibo Xu ◽  
Cheng Ren ◽  
Zhong Li ◽  
Kun Zhang ◽  
Teng Ma ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Intramedullary Nailing ◽  
Locking Compression Plate ◽  
Tibial Fractures ◽  
Cost Effectiveness Ratio ◽  
Intraoperative Bleeding ◽  
Distal Tibial Fractures ◽  
Total Cost ◽  
Final Treatment ◽  
Compression Plate ◽  
Surgical Duration

Abstract Background To analyze the clinical characteristic and economic of intramedullary nailing versus locking compression plate for the treatment of open distal tibial fractures.Methods A retrospective analysis was conducted by enrolling patients with open distal tibial fractures who were admitted in Lower Limb Surgery Ward of Traumatic Orthopedic Department，Xi’an Honghui Hospital from January 2016 to January 2019. The collected clinical materials and data included gender, age, injury mechanism, smoke and alcohol, comorbidity disease, Gustilo classification, days before operation, final treatment option, surgical duration, intraoperative bleeding loss, length of stay, complications, Johner-Wruhs criteria, total cost within 1 year after surgery (including hospitalization expenses and postoperative rehabilitation or follow-up expenses). All the patients were divided into two groups based on the final treatment options: Group IMN(intramedullary nailing) and Group LCP(locking compression plate). Cost data for each case within 1 year after surgery were analyzed for the cost-effectiveness ratio (CER)and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of IMN versus LCP.Results 49 consecutive cases were enrolled including 28 cases of Group IMN and 21 cases of Group LCP with the excellent and good rate of 82.1% (23 cases) and 85.7% (18 cases) respectively based on Johner-Wruhs criteria. The surgical duration (p=0.017) and intraoperative bleeding loss(p=0.046) were significantly lower in Group IMN than in Group LCP. Total cost within 1 year after surgery(p=0.048) was also less in Group IMN（126435.90±39093.98 CNY）than in Group LCP（147834.60±56821.12 CNY）. No statistically significant difference was discovered on the excellent and good rate of Johner-Wruhs criteria between the two groups(p＞0.05). The average cost for every 1% of excellent and good rate was 1540.02 CNY in Group IMN and 1725.02 CNY in Group LCP. Each 1% increasing of excellent and good rate cost 5944.08 CNY more in Group LCP compared with Group IMN.Conclusions Both the IMN and LCP could provide a satisfactory outcome for open distal tibial fractures. However the IMN was a more cost-effective management than LCP when the economic analysis was included.

scholarly journals A comparative study between proximal femur locking compression plate and dynamic hip screw fixation in management of intertrochantric femur fractures

2016 ◽  
Vol 2 (4) ◽  
pp. 327
Author(s):  
Mithlesh Kumar Meena ◽  
Vinay Joshi
Keyword(s):  
Locking Plate ◽  
Locking Compression Plate ◽  
Dynamic Hip Screw ◽  
Intertrochanteric Fractures ◽  
Trochanteric Fractures ◽  
Superficial Infection ◽  
Femur Fractures ◽  
Compression Plate ◽  
Hip Screw ◽  
The Mean

<p class="abstract"><strong>Background:</strong> Proximal femur fractures are one of the commonest fracture encountered in orthopaedic trauma practice. Dynamic hip screw (DHS) is the gold standard procedure for treatment for stable intertrochanteric  fractures, however problem arises with unstable fractures in maintenance of neck shaft angle and proper reduction. Here we are giving results of trochanteric fractures treated with proximal femoral locking compression plate (PFLCP) as compared with dynamic hip screw (DHS).</p><p class="abstract"><strong>Methods:</strong> This study was a prospective study. Two groups of trochanteric fractures of 25 patients operated with DHS and LCP were taken. Each patient was followed-up from July 2011 to October 2012 for minimum of 12 month or till the bony union.<strong> </strong>Every fracture was classified according to AO classification. Functional results will be assessed as per modified Harris hip evaluation score.<strong></strong></p><p class="abstract"><strong>Results:</strong> Among 25 patient treated with PFLCP, length discrepancy was .857 cm while that for DHS was 1.2 cm. The mean time of unaided walking with LCP Was 14.20 weeks while for DHS it was 16.20 weeks. The mean varus angulation for LCP 8 degree while for DHS 10.2 degree. In LCP in 1 case screw cut out from head and neck of femur while in DHS, same is seen in 2 cases and in addition loss of position of lag screw seen in 5 cases.one case was found with superficial infection in LCP while in case of DHS 3 cases with deep infection for that implant was removed and 6 cases were found with superficial infection.</p><p><strong>Conclusions:</strong> Proximal femoral locking plate (PFLCP) is simple, stable for fixation with fewer complications, and is an effective method for unstable intertrochanteric fractures.  Comparing with DHS group, the locking plate has shorter operative time, fewer blood loss and drainage.</p>

scholarly journals Outcome of Pertrochanteric Femur Fractures with Proximal Femur Locking Compression Plate

2022 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 253-260
Author(s):  
Manpreet Singh
Keyword(s):  
Proximal Femur ◽  
Weight Bearing ◽  
Operating Time ◽  
Operation Time ◽  
Public Health Problem ◽  
Locking Compression Plate ◽  
Harris Hip Score ◽  
Pertrochanteric Fractures ◽  
Screw Breakage ◽  
Compression Plate

Background: Fractures of the proximal femur, including fractures affecting the pertrochanteric region, have become a public health problem. Owing to aging of the population, we have to operate on even more elderly patients who sometimes present with significant co-morbidities. Although conventional implants have given good results in stable peritrochanteric fractures, proximal femur locking compression plate (PFLCP) which has been recently introduced is better suited for comminuted, unstable pertrochanteric fractures and osteoporotic bones. In PF-LCP, bone-implantconstruct so formed is mechanically stable and fixation failure due to screw loosening in osteoporotic bone can be reduced. Materials &Methods: This prospective study was conducted in our institute and was approved by local ethical committee. Twenty-five consecutive patients of either sex with age more than 60 years (range, 60-84) having pertrochanteric fractures were operated upon with PFLCP. A.O classification was followed in the study and Singh’s index for osteoporosis was calculated. Operating time, blood loss and any technical difficulty with the implant were recorded. Patients were followed clinically and radiologically for union at fracture site and implant-related complications for a period of 24 months. The Harris Hip Score was used to document hip functions at final follow-up. Observations: Amongst the 25 patients, the average operation time in our study was 66.60±10.57 minutes. The average radiological union was 3.40±0.63 months (13.6 weeks). Average time for full weight bearing was 13.12±1.90 weeks. There were two cases of wound infection, one case of coxa vara and one case of a proximal screw back-out. There was no case of plate lift or screw breakage. There was no case of non-union. Conclusion: The PFLCP can be a feasible alternative to the treatment of peritrochanteric fractures. Treatment with PFLCP can provide good-to-excellent healing in osteoporotic bones having comminuted and unstable peritrochanteric fractures, with a limited occurrence of complications.

scholarly journals Evaluation of outcome of proximal femur locking compression plate (PFLCP) in unstable proximal femur fractures

2017 ◽  
Vol 8 (4) ◽  
pp. 308-312
Author(s):  
Malkesh D. Shah ◽  
Chirag S. Kapoor ◽  
Rishit J. Soni ◽  
Jagdish J. Patwa ◽  
Paresh P. Golwala
Keyword(s):  
Proximal Femur ◽  
Locking Compression Plate ◽  
Proximal Femur Fractures ◽  
Femur Fractures ◽  
Compression Plate
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document