scholarly journals Comparison of Roll Stitch Technique and Core Suture Technique for Extensor Tendon Repair at the Metacarpophalangeal Joint level

2016 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Hamid Namazi ◽  
Kamran Mozaffarian ◽  
Mohammad Reza Golmakani
Hand Therapy ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 23 (1) ◽  
pp. 3-18 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shirley JF Collocott ◽  
Edel Kelly ◽  
Richard F Ellis

Introduction Early mobilisation protocols after repair of extensor tendons in zone V and VI provide better outcomes than immobilisation protocols. This systematic review investigated different early active mobilisation protocols used after extensor tendon repair in zone V and VI. The purpose was to determine whether any one early active mobilisation protocol provides superior results. Methods An extensive literature search was conducted to identify articles investigating the outcomes of early active mobilisation protocols after extensor tendon repair in zone V and VI. Databases searched were AMED, Embase, Medline, Cochrane and CINAHL. Studies were included if they involved participants with extensor tendon repairs in zone V and VI in digits 2–5 and described a post-operative rehabilitation protocol which allowed early active metacarpophalangeal joint extension. Study designs included were randomised controlled trials, observational studies, cohort studies and case series. The Structured Effectiveness Quality Evaluation Scale was used to evaluate the methodological quality of the included studies. Results Twelve articles met the inclusion criteria. Two types of early active mobilisation protocols were identified: controlled active motion protocols and relative motion extension splinting protocols. Articles describing relative motion extension splinting protocols were more recent but of lower methodological quality than those describing controlled active motion protocols. Participants treated with controlled active motion and relative motion extension splinting protocols had similar range of motion outcomes, but those in relative motion extension splinting groups returned to work earlier. Discussion The evidence reviewed suggested that relative motion extension splinting protocols may allow an earlier return to function than controlled active motion protocols without a greater risk of complication.


2011 ◽  
Vol 11 (04) ◽  
pp. 845-855 ◽  
Author(s):  
BENG HAI LIM ◽  
LAI HOCK OOI ◽  
SIAW MENG CHOU ◽  
KHENG LIM GOH

A six-strand single-loop technique has been implemented for repairing extensor tendons. This paper describes an investigation to compare the biomechanical properties of extensor tendons repaired using this technique with three other commonly used techniques, namely the Kessler-Tajima (two-stand) technique, the Tsuge (two-strand) technique, and the modified (four-strand and double-loop) Tsuge technique. Epitendinous stitches were implemented on all techniques. From human cadaveric hands, extensor tendons were harvested, transected, and repaired using these techniques. Tensile test was performed on the repaired tendons to determine the force at the first gap opening, 1-mm and 2-mm gap distances and at the maximum load. We have observed that at the first gap opening, the forces generated in the tendons repaired using the six-strand, Kessler-Tajima, and modified Tsuge techniques are significantly larger than the Tsuge technique. Thereafter, the force generated at gap distances of 1 mm, 2 mm, and the maximum force depend on the number of strands and the epitendinous stitches. In this case, the maximum force (31.80 N ± 4.73 N) from the six-strand technique is significantly higher than that from the Kessler-Tajima technique. In particular, all samples from the six-strand technique failed by suture pull-out. In contrast, suture pull-out is less common for the other techniques; these samples also exhibited suture rupture. This study is important because it reveals that cadaveric tendons repaired using the Kessler-Tajima, modified Tsuge, and six-strand techniques can accommodate higher initial forces (compared to the Tsuge technique) and, thus, are more effective for resisting gap formation. Among these techniques, it is shown that the six-strand configuration is reliable because the strands, rather than breaking, results in pull-out at sufficiently high loads. Thus, the six-strand approach for anchoring the ruptured tissue results in the transfer of large forces to the suture. It is suggested that the six-strand technique may be a viable technique since it requires only a single-loop suture and this may simplify the repair procedure and tendon handling without increasing the bulk of the repaired tendon appreciably.


2003 ◽  
Vol 28 (3) ◽  
pp. 224-227 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. BRÜNER ◽  
M. WITTEMANN ◽  
A. JESTER ◽  
K. BLUMENTHAL ◽  
G. GERMANN

This retrospective study evaluates a dynamic active motion protocol for extensor tendon repairs in zones V to VII. Fifty-eight patients with 87 extensor tendon injuries were examined. Using Geldmacher’s and Kleinert and Verdan’s evaluation systems, the results were graded as “excellent” and “good” in more than 94%, and as “satisfactory” in the remainder. The need for secondary tenolysis was low (6%), and no other surgical complication occurred.


Hand Surgery ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 18 (01) ◽  
pp. 103-105 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ken Teo ◽  
Anthony Berger

We report a case of rotatory subluxation of the metacarpophalangeal joint (MCPJ) of the finger. A 40-year-old man sustained an open injury to his index finger following an explosive injury. Radiographs showed rotatory subluxation of the index finger MCPJ. The index finger extensor digitorium was found interposed in the MCPJ, with a complete tear of the radial collateral ligament. Treatment was by open reduction and repair of the collateral ligament and the extensor tendon. A high level of clinical suspicion is needed to diagnose this entity.


Author(s):  
Scott F. M. Duncan ◽  
Christopher W. Flowers

Author(s):  
Marie Castoldi ◽  
Federico Solla ◽  
Olivier Camuzard ◽  
Martine Pithioux ◽  
Virginie Rampal ◽  
...  

Orthopedics ◽  
1987 ◽  
Vol 10 (10) ◽  
pp. 1387-1389
Author(s):  
Bruce S Wolock ◽  
J Russell Moore ◽  
Andrew J Weiland

Author(s):  
Pao-Yuan Lin ◽  
Sandeep J. Sebastin ◽  
Kevin C. Chung

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document