scholarly journals An innovation-cycle framework of integrated agricultural knowledge system and innovation for improving farmers climate change adaptation and risk mitigation capacities: A case of Bangladesh

2015 ◽  
Vol 7 (7) ◽  
pp. 213-220
Author(s):  
Zillur Rahman Md
2018 ◽  
Vol 33 (3) ◽  
pp. 238-251 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rachel Bezner Kerr ◽  
Hanson Nyantakyi-Frimpong ◽  
Laifolo Dakishoni ◽  
Esther Lupafya ◽  
Lizzie Shumba ◽  
...  

AbstractClimate change is projected to have severe implications for smallholder agriculture in Africa, with increased temperatures, increased drought and flooding occurrence, and increased rainfall variability. Given these projections, there is a need to identify effective strategies to help rural communities adapt to climatic risks. Yet, relatively little research has examined the politics and social dynamics around knowledge and sources of information about climate-change adaptation with smallholder farming communities. This paper uses a political ecology approach to historically situate rural people's experiences with a changing climate. Using the concept of the co-production of knowledge, we examine how Malawian smallholder farmers learn, perceive, share and apply knowledge about a changing climate, and what sources they draw on for agroecological methods in this context. As well, we pay particular attention to agricultural knowledge flows within and between households. We ask two main questions: Whose knowledge counts in relation to climate-change adaptation? What are the political, social and environmental implications of these knowledge dynamics? We draw upon a long-term action research project on climate-change adaptation that involved focus groups, interviews, observations, surveys, and participatory agroecology experiments with 425 farmers. Our findings are consistent with other studies, which found that agricultural knowledge sources were shaped by gender and other social inequalities, with women more reliant on informal networks than men. Farmers initially ranked extension services as important sources of knowledge about farming and climate change. After farmers carried out participatory agroecological research, they ranked their own observation and informal farmer networks as more important sources of knowledge. Contradictory ideas about climate-change adaptation, linked to various positions of power, gaps of knowledge and social inequalities make it challenging for farmers to know how to act despite observing changes in rainfall. Participatory agroecological approaches influenced adaptation strategies used by smallholder farmers in Malawi, but most still maintained the dominant narrative about climate-change causes, which focused on local deforestation by rural communities. Smallholder farmers in Malawi are responsible for <1% of global greenhouse gas emissions, yet our results show that the farmers often blame their own rural communities for changes in deforestation and rainfall patterns. Researchers need to consider differences knowledge and power between scientists and farmers and the contradictory narratives at work in communities to foster long-term change.


2012 ◽  
Vol 63 (3) ◽  
pp. 240 ◽  
Author(s):  
L. Rickards ◽  
S. M. Howden

Climate change presents the need and opportunity for what the Stern report called ‘major, non-marginal change’. Such transformational adaptation is rapidly emerging as a serious topic in agriculture. This paper provides an overview of the topic as it applies to agriculture, focusing on the Australian situation. It does so by first defining transformational adaptation, distinguishing it from other more incremental but overlapping modes of climate change adaptation and positing its emergence in agriculture as a response to both drivers and opportunities. The multiple dimensions of transformational adaptation are highlighted before two types or cases are focussed upon in order to tease out issues and highlight two major examples of transformation in agriculture in the past. Four key issues about climate change adaptation in agriculture particularly pertinent for transformational adaptation are then reviewed: the identification, level, distribution and management of the costs of adaptation; the definition, potential for and need to avoid maladaptation; the capacity demands that this level of adaptation presents; and the role of government in adaptation. Overall, transformational adaptation poses potential great gains but also great risks. It reinforces the realisation that agricultural research can no longer remain insulated from off-farm, non-science or non-agricultural knowledge or processes. Support and guidance of transformational adaptation requires that we understand how Australian agriculture is currently, and could be, positioned within the landscape, rural communities, and broader social, political and cultural environment.


Author(s):  
Nguyen Thi Tinh Au

To date, work in the field of climate change adaptation has resulted in many strategies for adaptation. In Vietnam, there have been many climate change adaptation activities implemented but has not been evaluated fully on effectiveness so that we can modify or make a replica of them systematically. In order to evaluate the effectiveness of carried out climate change adaptation activities, it is necessary to assess the current status of climate change adaptation for each local. In this paper, a set of CCA status evaluation indicators was developed and appreciated for Moc Hoa district, Long An province, to support a comprehensive assessment of the adaptation ability of this study area, the validity of investment resources allocation, and vulnerability to expose suitable policies. This set includes three indicators which are natural environment resilience, climate change vulnerability and climate change risk mitigation. The results showed that the environmental resilience indicators and the risk mitigation indicators were arranged at the medium level, while the climate change vulnerability indicators were high.


Author(s):  
Kari-Matti Vuori ◽  
Tuomas Saarinen

Suomessa on happamia sulfaattimaita viljelymaana 100 000 - 200 000 ha, ja metsätalouskäytössä oleva pinta-ala on tuntematon. Näiden maiden kuivatuksen aiheuttama happamuus- ja metallikuormitus on merkittävästi heikentänyt pintavesien ekologista ja kemiallista tilaa sekä jokien ja rannikkoalueiden kalakantoja. Sulfaattimailta tuleva nykyisinkin suuri ympäristökuormitus ja vesistöhaitat uhkaavat kasvaa entisestään ilmastonmuutoksen seurauksena. Hydrologisten ääriolojen yleistyminen, talvisadannan ja virtaamien kasvu sekä maaperän ja vesistöjen lämpeneminen lisäävät riskejä happamuuden ja metallien huuhtoutumiselle ja ekotoksikologisille haitoille. Korjaaviin toimenpiteisiin ryhtyminen on välttämätöntä vesipolitiikan puitedirektiivin, meristrategiadirektiivin, prioriteettiainedirektiivin, tulvadirektiivin ja luontodirektiivin mukaisten ympäristötavoitteiden saavuttamiseksi. Suomen ympäristökeskuksen (SYKE) koordinoimana on käynnistynyt vuosina 2010-2012 toteutettava, EU:n Life+-ohjelmasta rahoitettava hanke ilmastomuutoksen aiheuttamien ympäristöriskien vähentämiseksi happamilla sulfaattimailla (Climate Change Adaptation Tools for Environmental Risk Mitigation of Acid Sulphate Soils –CATERMASS). SYKEn lisäksi hankkeen päätoteuttajina ovat GTK, MTT, Helsingin yliopisto, Åbo Akademi sekä Etelä-Pohjanmaan elinkeino-, liikenne- ja ympäristökeskus. Hankkeen tavoitteena on kehittää valmiuksia sopeuttaa happamien sulfaattimaiden maankäyttöä ja vesiensuojelua muuttuvaan ilmastoon. Varautuminen vesistö-, kalasto- ja biodiversiteettihaittoihin ja niiden torjuntaan vaatii systemaattista tiedon kokoamista ongelma-alueista, happamuus- ja metallialtistuksen skenaarioista, ympäristöriskien luonteesta ja prioriteettikohteista sekä käytettävissä olevista vesiensuojelumenetelmistä ja niiden toimivuudesta muuttuvassa ilmastossa. Hanke on erittäin haastava, sillä ongelmien vähentäminen edellyttää maankuivatuksen ja viljelymenetelmien muuttamista yksityisomistuksessa olevilla maatalousmailla. Ympäristöhaittojen vähentäminen edellyttää laajapohjaista ja osallistavaa riskien hallintaan tähtäävää prosessia, jossa huomioidaan luonnontieteellisten näkökohtien ohella myös sosioekonomiset seikat.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document