scholarly journals Clinical Epidemiology and Health Services Research using the Diagnosis Procedure Combination Database in Japan

2015 ◽  
Vol 7 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 19-24 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hideo Yasunaga ◽  
Hiroki Matsui ◽  
Hiromasa Horiguchi ◽  
Kiyohide Fushimi ◽  
Shinya Matsuda
Keyword(s):  
Health Services Research ◽  
Health Services ◽  
Clinical Epidemiology ◽  
Services Research ◽  
Diagnosis Procedure Combination

The alias dilemma: Implications for health services research

2005 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ruth Elwood Martin ◽  
Greg Hislop ◽  
Veronika Moravan ◽  
Garry Grams ◽  
Betty Calam
Keyword(s):  
Health Services Research ◽  
Health Services ◽  
Services Research

11. Who is in charge? Introducing criteria to evaluate health human resource (HHR) policy documents

2007 ◽  
Vol 30 (4) ◽  
pp. 33
Author(s):  
D. Rosenfield ◽  
C. Abrahams ◽  
S. Verma
Keyword(s):  
Health Services Research ◽  
Health Services ◽  
Human Resource ◽  
Grey Literature ◽  
Implementation Strategies ◽  
Policy Formulation ◽  
Health Human Resource ◽  
Services Research ◽  
Policy Documents ◽  
Care Technology

The maldistribution of and lack of access to health professionals continues to be a major issue for policymakers at all levels of government. Additionally, the basis by which Health Human Resource (HHR) policy is determined is unclear. Publications found in independent reports, peer-reviewed journals and most importantly, grey literature, can significantly influence or inform major policy decisions for “hot button” HHR issues (1) . We propose a framework that can be used to classify, rank and evaluate HHR policy/planning documents. Our framework creates six major criteria that are used to evaluate policy documents. These criteria are: 1) literature review, 2) source of primary information, 3) nature of recommendations, 4) implementation strategies, 5) credibility of authors and 6) credibility of publisher. Within each category, a score from zero to three (for criteria 1-4) or zero to two (criteria 5-6) is assigned, depending on the caliber of the document. Summing the scores from each section yields a document’s overall score. The intent of this measure is two-fold. Firstly, we want to create a tool that can be widely utilized by policymakers to help inform their decisions. Secondly, it can be used as a springboard to stimulate discussion and debate around HHR planning and policy formulation. National Information Center on Health Services Research and Health Care Technology. (NICHSR) Health Services Research and Health Policy Grey Literature Project: Summary Report. 2006. http://www.nlm.nih.gov/ nichsr/greylitreport_06.html. Accessed February 20, 2007.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document