East meets the West: Fiqh al-Aqalliyat (Muslim jurisprudence on minorities); Dina de-Malchuta Dina (the law of the kingdom is the law); Dar al-Islam (abode of Islam); Dar al-Harb (abode of war)

Author(s):  
Amikam Nachmani

For 2000 years Jews have lived in exile as viable Jewish minority communities by recognizing the “law of the kingdom” (Dina de Malchuta) as their law alongside a system of rabbinic rulings (Responsa) whenever the demands of Jewish law (Halachah) and state laws contradict one another. Historically Muslims, however, have rarely experienced life among non-Muslims until relatively recently. Only since the post-World War II period have Muslims voluntarily chosen to leave the Dar al-Islam (the Abode of Islam) and live in the West or Dar al-Harb (the Abode of War) for economic, political and educational reasons. Mass migration has caused Muslim philosophers and theologians both in Muslim lands and abroad to adapt Sharia law to the new reality – Fiqh al-Aqalliyyat (the jurisprudence on minorities). The need to preserve the rules of the Muslim religion and to protect the unity of the Muslim nation (ummah) are critical given that one third of Muslims presently live as minorities in non-Muslim countries. Jewish legal precedents elaborated in this chapter point to similarities but also to differences between Jews and Muslims who encounter life as minorities within a Christian majority.

2000 ◽  
Vol 24 (1) ◽  
pp. 257-305
Author(s):  
Eric Fure-Slocum

Nicknaming his city “Dear Old Lady Thrift,”Milwaukee Journalwriter Richard Davis chastised city leaders for failing to build a “great city.” His unflattering portrait pictured post–World War II Milwaukee as a “plump and smiling city . … [sitting] in complacent shabbiness on the west shore of Lake Michigan like a wealthy old lady in black alpaca taking her ease on the beach.” He continued, “All her slips are showing, but she doesn’t mind a bit” (Davis 1947: 189, 191). Reprinted in theMilwaukee Journaltwo weeks before voters went to the polls to decide if the city would reverse its debt-free policy to finance postwar development, Davis’s depiction warned that Milwaukee was a chaotic andin efficient metropolis in danger of falling behind(“Not So Fair Is America’s Fair City”Milwaukee Journal[hereafterMJ], 16 March 1947). Her thriftiness bordered on stinginess, her complacency slipped into indolence, and her neglected femininity bespoke disorder. City leaders’ frugality, rooted in a tradition of cautious municipal fiscal policies, big city problems mismatched with small town attitudes, and public “indifference,” Davis contended, threatened the postwar city.


2000 ◽  
Vol 44 (4) ◽  
pp. 432
Author(s):  
Robert P. Ingalls ◽  
Gail Williams O'Brien

2001 ◽  
Vol 106 (1) ◽  
pp. 198
Author(s):  
Michael R. Belknap ◽  
Gail Williams O'Brien

2000 ◽  
Vol 87 (3) ◽  
pp. 1103
Author(s):  
Peter Wallenstein ◽  
Gail Williams O'Brien

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document