Naval Aviation Maintenance System: Analysis of Alternatives

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bradley Wilson ◽  
Jessie Riposo ◽  
Thomas Goughnour ◽  
Rachel Burns ◽  
Michael Vermeer ◽  
...  
1990 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. A. Aitken ◽  
M. J. Klem ◽  
K. E. Schull ◽  
F. A. Ruck ◽  
D. D. Wanner ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 59 (3) ◽  
pp. 93-111
Author(s):  
Adrian Gill ◽  
Sławomir Szrama

A key element of exploitation processes constitutes maintenance operations and tasks. While being conducted in the proper way, they have a crucial effect on achieving the assumed by aircraft designer and operator goals. Properly conducted maintenance operations allow to meet all the technical objects readiness requirements as well as to achieve desired acceptable risk level. Maintenance system effectiveness might be generally a crucial task for company or entity responsible for the maintenance. In this context, particularly relevant become technical object maintenance procedures and tasks developed by their manufacturers. Experience of the article authors quite early shows the need of the mainte-nance programmes modification. Aircraft manufacturers usually are not so eager to develop and implement mainte-nance programme modifications. Presented situation is very much the case in aviation transport. This was the reason why authors of this article decided to prepare and develop this elaboration which might constitute the assistance and supports complex technical objects users in maintenance decision. The main purpose of this article is to present maintenance decisions’ supporting method for the aircraft operators. This article provides guidelines which include a description of risk in the context of aviation maintenance and introduction of some methodologies, tools and criteria that support identification, analysis and evaluation of risk. Authors included idea, how the aircraft preventive maintenance could be used to mitigate aircraft failure risk during flight operations. It also shows how to adopt and develop effective maintenance program using tools for adequate risk analysis, optimal interval assignments, and selection of the most effective maintenance task. Authors presented methodology and de-scribed steps of the logic diagram analysis for the aircraft systems and their components, in order to manage and adopt aircraft maintenance program to fulfil aircraft airworthiness requirements and operational availability. The whole methodology was described on the basis of the F 16 aircraft maintenance system and with reference to the maintenance data. This article might also constitute an introduction to the aircraft maintenance programme development method.


Author(s):  
John Schmidt ◽  
Dylan Schmorrow ◽  
Robert Figlock

Naval Aviation has redoubled its long-standing efforts to eliminate mishaps, especially those linked to human error. The focus was expanded not only to cover aircrew error, but maintainer error as well. To examine maintainer error, the Naval Safety Center's Human Factors Analysis and Classification System (HFACS) was adapted to analyze reportable Naval Aviation maintenance related mishaps (MRMs). A total of 470 MRMs for Fiscal Years 90–97 were analyzed. The HFACS Maintenance Extension effectively profiled the nature of maintenance errors and depicted the latent supervisory, working, and maintainer conditions that “set the stage” for subsequent maintainer acts that were the proximate factors leading to a MRM. The profile and general findings held true for both major MRMs and less severe, reportable MRMs.


2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bradley Wilson ◽  
Jessie Riposo ◽  
Thomas Goughnour ◽  
Mel Eisman ◽  
Angelena Bohman ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document