scholarly journals GROWTH OF VERY LOW BIRTH WEIGHT PRETERM UNTIL 12 MONTHS OF CORRECTED AGE

2015 ◽  
Vol 25 (3) ◽  
pp. 351 ◽  
Author(s):  
Milene De Moraes Sedrez Rover ◽  
Cláudia Silveira Viera ◽  
Beatriz Rosana G. de Oliveira Toso ◽  
Sabrina Grassiolli ◽  
Bruna Maria Bugs

Introduction: facing the progressive increase in the survival of premature ta infants, a concern for health professionals would be related to the possible consequences arising from prematurity, among them the growth changes. Objectives: to describe the anthropometric variables of newborns Premature Very Low Birth Weight in the follow-up monitoring. Methods: observational, longitudinal and retrospective study, involving 71 children who left Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU), with a weight lower than 1500 g who were treated between 2006 and 2013. They should have at least three outpatient visits within twelve months of corrected age after NCAU discharge, in the following periods: period I up to 3 months of corrected age; period II between 4-6 months of corrected age and period III between 7-12 months of corrected age. Results: the mean Gestational Age (GA) was 29.4 weeks, 51% male, birth weight 1073.2 g, 70% with appropriate GA. The hospitalization stay was 68.73 days. Weight Z score at birth -0.95; at discharge -3.05; in period I -2.4; period II -1.8; period III -1.2. Height at birth -1.21, at discharge -2.23; -2.5; -1.8 and -1.1 for the periods I, II and III , respectively. Regarding the PT Z score at birth -0.71; at discharge -1.5; and monitoring -1.1; - 0.8 and -0.5 respectively in the periods I, II and III. Conclusions: despite of the great Z score reduction in NICU, there was a progressive improvement during follow-up in the Z score in the three anthropometric variables.

1995 ◽  
Vol 10 (5) ◽  
pp. 213-225 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marie C. Mccormick ◽  
Jane E. Stewart ◽  
Robyn Cohen ◽  
Marsha Joselaw ◽  
Priscilla S. Osborne ◽  
...  

Follow-up of the graduates of neonatal intensive care is an important component of the provision of such care. However, the objectives of these programs and their data-collection strategies vary widely. This report describes the potential objectives and different data-collection strategies. It then reviews briefly what is known about the outcomes of very low birth weight infants to guide the development of assessment packets: Finally, we describe the operation of our program and activities of our team to illustrate the follow-up experience in a large multi-institution program.


1997 ◽  
Vol 97 (4) ◽  
pp. 386-390 ◽  
Author(s):  
STEPHANIE R. BRYSON ◽  
LEA THERIOT ◽  
NELL J. RYAN ◽  
JANET POPE ◽  
NANCY TOLMAN ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 61 (1) ◽  
pp. 90-95 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jadwiga Wójkowska-Mach ◽  
T. Allen Merritt ◽  
Maria Borszewska-Kornacka ◽  
Joanna Domańska ◽  
Ewa Gulczyńska ◽  
...  

PEDIATRICS ◽  
1992 ◽  
Vol 89 (2) ◽  
pp. 357-357
Author(s):  
HELEN HARRISON

To the Editor.— The authors of the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development report on neonatal care1 found "important" variations among neonatal intensive care units in philosophies of treatment, methods of treatment, and short-term outcomes. In a recent meta-analysis of follow-up studies,2 researchers document a similarly haphazard approach to the long-term evaluation of very low birth weight survivors. Until randomized controlled clinical trials validate the safety and efficacy of neonatal therapies, and until long-term outcomes are assessed accurately, the treatment of very low birth weight infants should be declared experimental.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document