scholarly journals Columnar processing of border ownership in primate visual cortex

eLife ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 10 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tom P Franken ◽  
John H Reynolds
Keyword(s):  
Visual Cortex ◽  
Visual Space ◽  
Oculomotor System ◽  
Stimulus Onset ◽  
Area V4 ◽  
Horizontal Connections ◽  
Columnar Organization ◽  
Wide Range ◽  
Primate Visual Cortex ◽  
Deep Layers

To understand a visual scene, the brain segregates figures from background by assigning borders to foreground objects. Neurons in primate visual cortex encode which object owns a border (border ownership), but the underlying circuitry is not understood. Here, we used multielectrode probes to record from border ownership-selective units in different layers in macaque visual area V4 to study the laminar organization and timing of border ownership selectivity. We find that border ownership selectivity occurs first in deep layer units, in contrast to spike latency for small stimuli in the classical receptive field. Units on the same penetration typically share the preferred side of border ownership, also across layers, similar to orientation preference. Units are often border ownership-selective for a range of border orientations, where the preferred sides of border ownership are systematically organized in visual space. Together our data reveal a columnar organization of border ownership in V4 where the earliest border ownership signals are not simply inherited from upstream areas, but computed by neurons in deep layers, and may thus be part of signals fed back to upstream cortical areas or the oculomotor system early after stimulus onset. The finding that preferred border ownership is clustered and can cover a wide range of spatially contiguous locations suggests that the asymmetric context integrated by these neurons is provided in a systematically clustered manner, possibly through corticocortical feedback and horizontal connections.

scholarly journals Columnar processing of border ownership in primate visual cortex

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tom P Franken ◽  
John H Reynolds
Keyword(s):  
Visual Cortex ◽  
Visual Space ◽  
Oculomotor System ◽  
Stimulus Onset ◽  
Area V4 ◽  
Horizontal Connections ◽  
Columnar Organization ◽  
Wide Range ◽  
Primate Visual Cortex ◽  
Deep Layers

To understand a visual scene, the brain segregates figures from background by assigning borders to foreground objects. Neurons in primate visual cortex encode which object owns a border (border ownership), but the underlying circuitry is not understood. Here we used multielectrode probes to record from border ownership selective units in different layers in macaque visual area V4 to study the laminar organization and timing of border ownership selectivity. We find that border ownership selectivity occurs first in deep layer units, in contrast to spike latency for small stimuli in the classical receptive field. Units on the same penetration typically share the preferred side of border ownership, also across layers, similar to orientation preference. Units are often border ownership selective for a range of border orientations, where the preferred sides of border ownership are systematically organized in visual space. Together our data reveal a columnar organization of border ownership in V4 where the earliest border ownership signals are not simply inherited from upstream areas, but computed by neurons in deep layers, and may thus be part of signals fed back to upstream cortical areas or the oculomotor system early after stimulus onset. The finding that preferred border ownership is clustered and can cover a wide range of spatially contiguous locations, suggests that the asymmetric context integrated by these neurons is provided in a systematically clustered manner, possibly through corticocortical feedback and horizontal connections.

Adult Cortical Dynamics

1998 ◽  
Vol 78 (2) ◽  
pp. 467-485 ◽  
Author(s):  
CHARLES D. GILBERT
Keyword(s):  
Visual Cortex ◽  
Functional Properties ◽  
Primary Visual Cortex ◽  
Visual Information ◽  
Visual Space ◽  
Visual Pathway ◽  
Local Features ◽  
Spatial Integration ◽  
Cortical Dynamics ◽  
Wide Range

Gilbert, Charles D. Adult Cortical Dynamics. Physiol. Rev. 78: 467–485, 1998. — There are many influences on our perception of local features. What we see is not strictly a reflection of the physical characteristics of a scene but instead is highly dependent on the processes by which our brain attempts to interpret the scene. As a result, our percepts are shaped by the context within which local features are presented, by our previous visual experiences, operating over a wide range of time scales, and by our expectation of what is before us. The substrate for these influences is likely to be found in the lateral interactions operating within individual areas of the cerebral cortex and in the feedback from higher to lower order cortical areas. Even at early stages in the visual pathway, cells are far more flexible in their functional properties than previously thought. It had long been assumed that cells in primary visual cortex had fixed properties, passing along the product of a stereotyped operation to the next stage in the visual pathway. Any plasticity dependent on visual experience was thought to be restricted to a period early in the life of the animal, the critical period. Furthermore, the assembly of contours and surfaces into unified percepts was assumed to take place at high levels in the visual pathway, whereas the receptive fields of cells in primary visual cortex represented very small windows on the visual scene. These concepts of spatial integration and plasticity have been radically modified in the past few years. The emerging view is that even at the earliest stages in the cortical processing of visual information, cells are highly mutable in their functional properties and are capable of integrating information over a much larger part of visual space than originally believed.

scholarly journals Distinct Laminar Processing of Local and Global Context in Primate Primary Visual Cortex

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maryam Bijanzadeh ◽  
Lauri Nurminen ◽  
Sam Merlin ◽  
Alessandra Angelucci
Keyword(s):  
Visual Cortex ◽  
Primary Visual Cortex ◽  
Visual Space ◽  
Spatial Context ◽  
Surround Suppression ◽  
Cortical Layers ◽  
Global Context ◽  
Global Signal ◽  
Deep Layers ◽  
Contextual Stimuli

Visual perception is profoundly affected by spatial context. In visual cortex, neuronal responses to stimuli inside their receptive field (RF) are suppressed by contextual stimuli in the RF surround (surround suppression). How do neuronal RFs integrate information across visual space, and what role do different cortical layers play in the processing of spatial context? By recording simultaneously across all layers of macaque primary visual cortex, while presenting visual stimuli at increasing distances from the recorded cells RF, we find that near vs. far stimuli activate distinct layers. Stimuli in the near-surround evoke the earliest subthreshold responses in superficial and deep layers, and cause the earliest surround suppression of spiking responses in superficial layers. Instead, far-surround stimuli evoke the earliest subthreshold responses in feedback-recipient layers, i.e. 1 and the lower half of the deep layers, and suppress visually-evoked spiking responses almost simultaneously in all layers, except 4C, where suppression emerges latest. Our results reveal unique contributions of the cortical layers to the processing of local and global spatial context, and suggest distinct underlying circuits for local and global signal integration.

scholarly journals Low rank mechanisms underlying flexible visual representations

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Douglas A. Ruff ◽  
Cheng Xue ◽  
Lily E. Kramer ◽  
Faisal Baqai ◽  
Marlene R. Cohen
Keyword(s):  
Visual Cortex ◽  
Task Switching ◽  
Visual Processing ◽  
Neuronal Population ◽  
Low Rank ◽  
Common Mechanism ◽  
Sensory Stimuli ◽  
Area V4 ◽  
Motor Processes ◽  
Wide Range

AbstractNeuronal population responses to sensory stimuli are remarkably flexible. The responses of neurons in visual cortex depend on stimulus properties (e.g. contrast), processes that affect all stages of visual processing (e.g. adaptation), and cognitive processes (e.g attention or task switching). The effects of all of these processes on trial-averaged responses of individual neurons are well-described by divisive normalization, in which responses are scaled by the total stimulus drive. Normalization describes how a staggering variety of sensory, cognitive, and motor processes affect individual neurons (1), but whether different normalization processes could be mediated by the same mechanism remains poorly understood. We and others recently showed that attention has low rank effects on the covariability of populations of neurons in visual area V4 (2–4), which strongly constrains mechanistic models mechanism (2). We hypothesized that measuring changes in population covariability associated with other normalization processes could clarify whether they might share a mechanism. Our experimental design included measurements in multiple visual areas using four normalization processes. We found that contrast, adaptation, attention, and task switching affect the responses of populations of neurons in primate visual cortex in a similarly low rank way. These results suggest that a given circuit uses a common mechanism to perform many forms of normalization and likely reflect a general principle that applies to a wide range of brain areas and sensory, cognitive, or motor processes.

scholarly journals A compact spatial map in V2 visual cortex

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiaoyang Long ◽  
Bin Deng ◽  
Jing Cai ◽  
Zhe Sage Chen ◽  
Sheng-Jia Zhang
Keyword(s):  
Visual Cortex ◽  
Cortical Neurons ◽  
Environmental Changes ◽  
Critical Role ◽  
Visual Space ◽  
Neuronal Firing ◽  
Neural Representation ◽  
Spatial Modulation ◽  
Wide Range

SummaryVision plays a critical role in guiding spatial navigation. A traditional view of the visual cortex is to compute a world-centered map of visual space, and visual neurons exhibit diverse tunings to simple or complex visual features. The neural representation of spatio-visual map in the visual cortex is thought to be transformed from spatial modulation signals at the hippocampal-entorhinal system. Although visual thalamic and cortical neurons have been shown to be modulated by spatial signals during navigation, the exact source of spatially modulated neurons within the visual circuit has never been identified, and the neural correlate underpinning a visuospatial or spatio-visual map remains elusive. To search for direct visuospatial and visuodirectional signals, here we record in vivo extracellular spiking activity in the secondary visual cortex (V2) from freely foraging rats in a naturalistic environment. We identify that V2 neurons forms a complete spatio-visual map with a wide range of spatial tunings, which resembles the classical spatial map that includes the place, head-direction, border, grid and conjunctive cells reported in the hippocampal-entorhinal network. These spatially tuned V2 neurons display stable responses to external visual cues, and are robust with respect to non- spatial environmental changes. Spatially and directionally tuned V2 neuronal firing persists in darkness, suggesting that this spatio-visual map is not completely dependent on visual inputs. Identification of functionally distinct spatial cell types in visual cortex expands its classical role of information coding beyond a retinotopic map of the eye-centered world.

Focusing of Visuospatial Attention

2001 ◽  
Vol 15 (4) ◽  
pp. 256-274 ◽  
Author(s):  
Caterina Pesce ◽  
Rainer Bösel
Keyword(s):  
Reaction Times ◽  
Visual Space ◽  
Spatial Relation ◽  
Stimulus Onset ◽  
Visuospatial Attention ◽  
Task Demands ◽  
Time Interval ◽  
Behavioral Studies ◽  
Task Conditions ◽  
Simple Rt

Abstract In the present study we explored the focusing of visuospatial attention in subjects practicing and not practicing activities with high attentional demands. Similar to the studies of Castiello and Umiltà (e. g., 1990) , our experimental procedure was a variation of Posner's (1980) basic paradigm for exploring covert orienting of visuospatial attention. In a simple RT-task, a peripheral cue of varying size was presented unilaterally or bilaterally from a central fixation point and followed by a target at different stimulus-onset-asynchronies (SOAs). The target could occur validly inside the cue or invalidly outside the cue with varying spatial relation to its boundary. Event-related brain potentials (ERPs) and reaction times (RTs) were recorded to target stimuli under the different task conditions. RT and ERP findings showed converging aspects as well as dissociations. Electrophysiological results revealed an amplitude modulation of the ERPs in the early and late Nd time interval at both anterior and posterior scalp sites, which seems to be related to the effects of peripheral informative cues as well as to the attentional expertise. Results were: (1) shorter latency effects confirm the positive-going amplitude enhancement elicited by unilateral peripheral cues and strengthen the criticism against the neutrality of spatially nonpredictive peripheral cueing of all possible target locations which is often presumed in behavioral studies. (2) Longer latency effects show that subjects with attentional expertise modulate the distribution of the attentional resources in the visual space differently than nonexperienced subjects. Skilled practice may lead to minimizing attentional costs by automatizing the use of a span of attention that is adapted to the most frequent task demands and endogenously increases the allocation of resources to cope with less usual attending conditions.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document