CAROLINA CHICKADEE

2007 ◽  
pp. 252-253
Keyword(s):  
2002 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alison M. Mostrum ◽  
Robert L. Curry ◽  
Bernard Lohr

The Auk ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 122 (3) ◽  
pp. 759-772 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. L. Bronson ◽  
Thomas C. Grubb ◽  
Gene D. Sattler ◽  
Michael J. Braun

AbstractBlack-capped Chickadees (Poecile atricapillus) and Carolina Chickadees (P. carolinensis) hybridize in an east-west band from New Jersey to Kansas. Within the past century, the Ohio portion of this hybrid zone and the Carolina Chickadee range to the south have been moving northward, whereas the Black-capped Chickadee range has retracted. In Ohio, we characterized the genetic composition of the hybrid zone using five diagnostic molecular loci. Although there was no evidence of assortative mating in the center of the hybrid zone, we found a relative paucity of genetically intermediate breeding females as compared with breeding males. That suggests viability selection against female hybrids, in line with Haldane’s rule. On the basis of reproductive variables (number of nestlings, reproductive success), we found a decrease in productivity of breeding pairs in the hybrid zone that is significantly and positively related to their probability of producing homozygous offspring at each autosomal or sex-linked locus. We also found that the decrease in productivity was significantly and positively related to the genetic composition of the male of the pair (i.e. pure male chickadees more productive). These data strongly suggest that hybrids are at a selective disadvantage. Because the zone of reduced reproductive success was considerably narrower than the zone of introgression, our results demonstrate that genetic introgression is occurring in the face of substantial selection against hybrids.Éxito Reproductivo a través de la Zona de Hibridación de Poecile atricapillus y P. carolinensis en Ohio


The Auk ◽  
1942 ◽  
Vol 59 (3) ◽  
pp. 430-431 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eugene P. Odum
Keyword(s):  

2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (1) ◽  
pp. 16-23 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brittany A. Coppinger ◽  
Anasthasia Sanchez de Launay ◽  
Todd M. Freeberg

The Auk ◽  
1986 ◽  
Vol 103 (4) ◽  
pp. 676-681 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew L. Mack ◽  
Frank B. Gill ◽  
Robert Colburn ◽  
Christina Spolsky

Abstract Restriction enzyme analyses of mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) of the Black-capped Chickadee (Parus atricapillus), Carolina Chickadee (P. carolinensis), and Tufted Titmouse (P. bicolor) indicate substantial genetic divergence (p = 0.04-0.09). Eleven of 14 enzymes produced fragment patterns that distinguish the two chickadees, revealing a bounty of markers for studies of these sibling species.


The Auk ◽  
1922 ◽  
Vol 39 (4) ◽  
pp. 572-573
Keyword(s):  

2005 ◽  
Vol 83 (6) ◽  
pp. 820-833 ◽  
Author(s):  
Laurie L Bloomfield ◽  
Leslie S Phillmore ◽  
Ronald G Weisman ◽  
Christopher B Sturdy

Species of the genus Poecile Kaup, 1829 (the chickadees) are well suited to comparative studies of acoustic communication because their songs and calls occur in similar contexts and are acoustically similar. Here we provide careful, reliable descriptions and spectrographic exemplars for seven note types observed in the chick-a-dee calls of the Carolina chickadee, Poecile carolinensis (Audubon, 1834). The note types include A, C, and D notes similar to those found in the chick-a-dee calls of the black-capped chickadee, Poecile atricapillus (L., 1766), a complex of three B-note subtypes (B1, B2, and B3) and a rare note type previously identified as high-tee-chick. In common with black-capped chickadees, the organization of note types in Carolina chickadees follows a stringent syntax; the position of note types within a call is fixed. In contrast with black-capped chickadees, the chick-a-dee call syntax of the Carolina chickadee includes a B-note complex composed of three acoustically distinct subtypes of B notes, and follows a strict syntax: A→(B1→B2→B3)→C→D. Analysis of call variability suggests that the B-note complex (in particular, the most commonly sung note, B2) and the D note may provide reliable cues for species and individual recognition.


2016 ◽  
Vol 15 (4) ◽  
pp. N44-N49 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wynn F. Haslam ◽  
Richard A. Rowe ◽  
J. Luke Phillips

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document