So Sue Him

Author(s):  
Jasmine Farrier

This chapter explores a diverse set of member lawsuits, spanning the “pocket veto,” three cases related to treaty changes/withdrawals, and a case on the Affordable Care Act that was settled recently. All of these cases highlight the way that conventional partisan warfare creeps into legal battles. The member-plaintiffs in these cases are attacking opposition presidents for institutional behaviors and constitutional interpretations that they appear to forgive in their own presidents. This partisan dynamic dilutes the power and potential significance of the claim. Moreover, if federal courts are being dragged into separation of powers questions just to expand the arena of partisan combat, there is no deep reset of systemic balance of power in the constitutional order. Congressional power should mean more than defending one's own party when in the minority or in the majority under conditions of divided government.

2015 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 64-78
Author(s):  
Leighton Vaughan Williams

This paper examines the 2012 US Supreme Court consideration of the Affordable Care Act, and the resulting judgment, with a view to learning what lessons this landmark case can afford us into the way in which the US Supreme Court works, so helping us forecast its decisions. Although this is simply one judgment among many, a case is advanced here that the details of the way that the judgment was made can be used to help arbitrate between conflicting interpretations in the literature as to the way that the US Supreme Court reaches its decisions. It is argued that consideration of this case does provide particular insights which might usefully improve forecasts of future Supreme Court decisions.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document