Lonkan tekonivelleikkauksen jälkeinen fysioterapeuttinen ohjaus fysioterapeuttien kuvaamana

Lonkan tekonivelleikkausten sekä leikkauksen jälkeistä fysioterapiaa tarvitsevien määrä kasvaa väestön ikääntyessä. Kuntoutumisen kannalta fysioterapeuttinen ohjaus on tärkeää. Tämän tutkimuksen tarkoituksena oli tarkastella fysioterapeuttien käsityksiä lonkan tekonivelleikkauksen jälkeisestä fysioterapeuttisesta ohjauksesta. Laadullisen tutkimuksen aineistona oli fysioterapeuttisten ohjaustilanteiden (n=7) kuvanauhojen pohjalta tehdyt recall-haastattelut. Aineiston fenomenografisessa analyysissä muodostettiin kolme hierarkkista kuvauskategoriaa, jotka olivat suppeammasta laajempaan: asiantuntijalähtöinen fysioterapeuttinen ohjaus, potilaan yksilöllisyyttä arvostava fysioterapeuttinen ohjaus sekä fysioterapeuttinen ohjaus osana potilaan kuntoutumista. Nämä kategoriat sisälsivät kuusi ohjaustilanteita kuvaavaa teemaa ja niiden variaatiot: potilaan osallistuminen, kehollinen ohjaus, eettisyys ohjaussuhteessa, fysioterapeutin asiantuntijuus, yhteistyö ja terveydenhuoltojärjestelmän eettisyys. Fysioterapeuttisen ohjauksen onnistumisen kannalta kriittiset tekijät fysioterapeuttien ohjauskäsityksissä olivat potilaskeskeisyys, moniammatillinen yhteistyö ja kuntoutumisprosessin jatkuvuus. Abstract Physiotherapists’ perceptions of patient counseling after total hip arthroplasty (THA) The number of total hip arthroplasties is growing due to the fact that THA is a cost-effective procedure moving people quickly from poor to good functional capacity. The aim of the qualitative study was to explore physiotherapists’ perceptions of post-operative patient counseling. The data of this study consisted of seven physiotherapy situations with inpatients in hospital setting. Data were collected by open recall-interviews based on videotapes of patient counseling situations. The data were analyzed according to phenomenographic approach, which revealed three hierarchical categories: therapist-centered patient counseling, patient counseling which values patient’ individuality and patient counseling as part of individual rehabilitation process. Six themes that varied hierarchically in three categories describing different ways of understanding patient counseling were found: patients’ active participation, counseling for movement awareness, ethical counseling relationship, physiotherapy expertise, cooperation, and ethicality of national health care system. The critical variation between categories manifested as patient-centeredness, multiprofessional cooperation and the continuity of rehabilitation process.

How we implemented Continuous Interprofessional Education at a newly established public hospital in Singapore

Introduction To promote interprofessional collaboration (IPC), our newly established hospital implemented the Continuing Interprofessional Education (CIPE) initiatives, which included a half-day workshop and 15 sessions of Grand Rounds, with the content focusing on establishing interprofessional patient-centered care pathways, policies, and ultimately to build a community of IPC. Methods To evaluate the impact of the CIPE initiatives, 120 staff who attended at least 50% of the CIPE sessions were invited to complete the Interprofessional Attitudes Scale (IPAS). Results 67.5% of the invited participants completed the survey. The majority of the participants answered “agree” or “strongly agree” for the domains of Teamwork/Roles/Responsibilities, Patient-centeredness, Diversity and Ethics, and Community Centeredness after going through the CIPE initiatives. The Interprofessional Bias domain revealed mixed responses. Discussions and Implications of practice The significant contributing factors towards the success of the CIPE Grand Rounds included: (1) the topics were proposed by our staff and centered on clinical practice; (2) the delivery format was interactive, guided by adult learning principles. The mixed responses regarding the presence of biases among the participants suggested that interprofessional biases are deep-rooted in the healthcare setting, and attendance of these CIPE Grand Rounds made participants more acutely aware of these biases. However, more actions are needed to eradicate these biases.

Cancer patient management: role of multidisciplinary teams

ObjectivesAs a cancer model recommended by numerous governments and health care systems, multidisciplinary teams (MDTs) can improve clinical decision-making and overall patient care quality. This paper aims to discuss key elements and resources, as well as contingencies for effectiveness MDTs and their meetings.MethodsWe derived elements, resources, and contingencies for effective MDTs by analyzing articles on the themes of MDTs and MDT meetings.ResultsThis paper identifies key elements comprising MDT characteristics, team governance, infrastructure for MDM, MDM organization, MDM logistics, and clinical decision-making in light of patient-centeredness. Resources that facilitate an MDM functioning consist of human resources and non-human resources. The paper further detects barriers to the sustainable performance of MDTs and provide suggestions for improving their functioning in light of patients’ and healthcare providers’ perspectives.ConclusionsMDTs are vital to cancer care through enabling healthcare professionals with diversity of clinical specialties to collaborate and formulate optimal treatment recommendations for patients with suspected or confirmed cancer.

Indicators of Infertility and Fertility Care: A Systematic Scoping Review

Background: The identification of appropriate, relevant and valid indicators of infertility and fertility care is critical to effective monitoring of progress in fertility care access, equity, utilization and impact globally. The aim of the review was to map existing literature on indicators of infertility and fertility care and summarize these indicators by typology and dimensions.Methods: This review followed the framework of Arksey and O’Malley. Bibliographic databases of published studies (MEDLINE, PubMed, JSTOR, CINAHL, Web of Science and Scopus) were searched from inception to June 2021. We also searched unpublished datasets and hand-searched reference lists of relevant articles. Two reviewers independently screened reports and extracted data onto a data charting table before collating and summarizing results.Results: We included 46 reports from 88 countries. The reporting of data was either voluntary in 63 countries (72%) and compulsory in 25 countries (28%). The reporting of data was partial in 63 countries (72%) and complete in 25 countries (28%). Reporting for cycles or deliveries were based on individual cycles in 56 countries (64%) and on cumulative cycles in 32 countries (36%). In types of overall typology, most of the indicators were outcome indicators (70%) with fewer being process indicators (16%) or structural indicators (14%). In terms of dimension, of most indicators were effectiveness and efficiency indicators. Indicators on safety, patient-centeredness, equity, and timeliness were under-reported.Conclusion: A wide range of indicators of infertility and fertility care exist in literature; however, most are outcomes indicators of effectiveness and efficiency dimensions, while those on safety, patient-centeredness, equity, and timeliness and non-clinical aspects are limited. These findings provide a basis for selection and prioritization of a core set of indicators to monitor progress in fertility care.Systematic review registration: Open Science Framework (osf.io/78wrg)

A short scale for measuring attitudes towards the doctor-patient relationship: psychometric properties and measurement invariance of the German Patient-Practitioner-Orientation Scale (PPOS-D6)

Background The Patient-Practitioner Orientation Scale (PPOS) was originally developed to compare doctor’s and patient’s consensus regarding patient centeredness. Research assumed PPOS measurements to be comparable across different groups of participants, however, without assessing the actual validity of this assumption. In this study, we investigate the psychometric properties and measurement invariance of a short version of the German translation of the PPOS. Methods Based on a cross-sectional survey of N = 332 medical students, we present a short version of the German Patient-Practitioner-Orientation Scale (PPOS-D6) and examine its psychometric properties as well as measurement invariance across participants with varying levels of medical experience and gender using multigroup confirmatory factor analyses. Results Results indicate that PPOS-D6 provides valid and reliable measurements of patient-centeredness that are invariant across participants with different medical experience. Preliminary results also suggest invariance across gender. Conclusion PPOS-D6 is a suitable and efficient measure to compare group-specific attitudes towards the doctor-patient interaction. Additional research on convergent and discriminant validity and divergent study samples is advised.

Evaluation of patient satisfaction in a Government Homeopathic Hospital in West Bengal, India

Background and aims – Discovering the degree of patient satisfaction in a medical practice setting may put substantial impact in improving health status and quality of care provided. In this study, the researchers evaluated the degree of patient satisfaction following medical encounters and re-examined the validity and reliability of the used questionnaires. Methodology – An institutional, cross-sectional, observational study was carried out involving 390 participants in February, 2013 in five out-patient clinics of Mahesh Bhattacharyya Homeopathic Medical College and Hospital, Govt. of West Bengal, Howrah, India. A 12-item Japanese short-form self-administered consultation satisfaction questionnaire translated into Bengali with a 5-point Likert scale was used. The questionnaire generated 5 subscales – overall satisfaction, complete examination, whole person care, examination time, and patient centeredness. Visual analogue scales (VASs) of 100mm were provided with each single question item and each subscale. Results – The questionnaire appeared reliable and valid. Internal consistency scores Cronbach’s α were between 0.7-0.9 and test-retest reliability Cohen’s κ was greater than 0.7 for each item. Concurrent validity Pearson’s r between total questionnaire and VASs was 0.60, P < 0.001; each subscale scores 0.8 < r < 0.9, P < 0.0001, and each question score 0.8 < r < 0.9, P < 0.0001. Comparison of mean scores of five different subscales for five different outpatient clinics yielded F ratios between 4.3-9.8 (P < 0.05, df = 4, 95% CI) establishing discriminant validity. Conclusions – Overall, the patients’ satisfaction appeared to be high. Further works should be undertaken adapting the questionnaire globally in different languages.

Patients' Evaluation of the Quality of Emergency Care Services in Jordan: Integration of Patient Centeredness Model

Background and PurposeAccreditation is viewed to enhance the total quality of healthcare. The present study aims at assessing patients' perspectives toward the quality of emergency healthcare services at different hospitals with different characteristics in Jordan. The elements of patients' perception were aligned with the conceptual framework of Patient Centeredness Model.MethodsThis descriptive cross-sectional study was carried out in four emergency departments from different healthcare sectors and accreditation statuses in Jordan. Less urgent/nonurgent, alert, and cooperative patients were identified directly after the completion of emergency treatment. The perspectives of patients about the quality of emergency services were evaluated by 10 domains articulated in a validated accident and emergency questionnaire.ResultsA total of 276 patients were enrolled in the study. Private sector scored higher in all assessment domains in both accredited and nonaccredited hospitals in comparison with the government sector. Accredited government hospitals scored higher in patients' evaluation for “doctor and nurse,” “investigations,” “pain,” and “overall respect of medical staff” domains than nonaccredited government hospitals. The overall experience was significantly different between accredited and nonaccredited government hospitals.Implications for PracticeQuality of emergency care services should be assessed through various dimensions related to patients' perspectives. Patients' perception toward the quality of emergency health services is evidently enhanced by accreditation especially in the government sector.