scholarly journals Effective Extraction of Phytoecdysteroids from Fronds of Matteuccia struthiopteris and Osmunda japonica

2011 ◽  
Vol 24 (4) ◽  
pp. 351-357 ◽  
Author(s):  
So-Lim Shin ◽  
Cheol-Hee Lee
Keyword(s):  
HortScience ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 45 (10) ◽  
pp. 1489-1495 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kwang Jin Kim ◽  
Myeong Il Jeong ◽  
Dong Woo Lee ◽  
Jeong Seob Song ◽  
Hyoung Deug Kim ◽  
...  

The efficiency of volatile formaldehyde removal was assessed in 86 species of plants representing five general classes (ferns, woody foliage plants, herbaceous foliage plants, Korean native plants, and herbs). Phytoremediation potential was assessed by exposing the plants to gaseous formaldehyde (2.0 μL·L−1) in airtight chambers (1.0 m3) constructed of inert materials and measuring the rate of removal. Osmunda japonica, Selaginella tamariscina, Davallia mariesii, Polypodium formosanum, Psidium guajava, Lavandula spp., Pteris dispar, Pteris multifida, and Pelargonium spp. were the most effective species tested, removing more than 1.87 μg·m−3·cm−2 over 5 h. Ferns had the highest formaldehyde removal efficiency of the classes of plants tested with O. japonica the most effective of the 86 species (i.e., 6.64 μg·m−3·cm−2 leaf area over 5 h). The most effective species in individual classes were: ferns—Osmunda japonica, Selaginella tamariscina, and Davallia mariesii; woody foliage plants—Psidium guajava, Rhapis excels, and Zamia pumila; herbaceous foliage plants—Chlorophytum bichetii, Dieffenbachia ‘Marianne’, Tillandsia cyanea, and Anthurium andraeanum; Korean native plants—Nandina domestica; and herbs—Lavandula spp., Pelargonium spp., and Rosmarinus officinalis. The species were separated into three general groups based on their formaldehyde removal efficiency: excellent (greater than 1.2 μg·m−3 formaldehyde per cm2 of leaf area over 5 h), intermediate (1.2 or less to 0.6), and poor (less than 0.6). Species classified as excellent are considered viable phytoremediation candidates for homes and offices where volatile formaldehyde is a concern.


2018 ◽  
Vol 34 (6) ◽  
pp. 847-850 ◽  
Author(s):  
Li Bowen ◽  
Chen Li ◽  
Li Bin ◽  
Tian Ying ◽  
Liu Shijun ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 177 (3) ◽  
pp. 287-293 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jian-Guo Cao ◽  
Xiao-Fei Dai ◽  
Xi-Ling Dai ◽  
Quan-Xi Wang

2007 ◽  
Vol 120 (5) ◽  
pp. 641-645 ◽  
Author(s):  
Suzue M. Kawakami ◽  
Juntaro Kato ◽  
Shogo Kawakami ◽  
Shunsuke Serizawa

2003 ◽  
Vol 164 (4) ◽  
pp. 527-534 ◽  
Author(s):  
Suzue M. Kawakami ◽  
Shogo Kawakami ◽  
Katsuhiko Kondo ◽  
Juntaro Kato ◽  
Michio Ito
Keyword(s):  

2009 ◽  
Vol 122 (6) ◽  
pp. 585-595 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yoko Yatabe ◽  
Chie Tsutsumi ◽  
Yumiko Hirayama ◽  
Keigo Mori ◽  
Noriaki Murakami ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document