scholarly journals Does Change in Thread Shape Influence the Pull Out Strength of Mini Implants? An In vitro Study

Author(s):  
Aniruddh V. Yashwant
2011 ◽  
Vol 20 (2) ◽  
pp. 139-145 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chun-Ming Chen ◽  
Ju-Hui Wu ◽  
Pei-Chen Lu ◽  
Huang-Chi Wang ◽  
Huey-Er Lee ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 26 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Flávio de Mendonça COPELLO ◽  
Daniel Paludo BRUNETTO ◽  
Carlos Nelson ELIAS ◽  
Matheus Melo PITHON ◽  
Raildo Silva COQUEIRO ◽  
...  

ABSTRACT Objective: Assess the influence of mono- and bicortical anchorage and diameter of mini-implants (MIs) on the primary stability of these devices. Methods: 60 self-drilling MIs were distributed in six groups according to diameter (1.5mm, 1.8mm or 2.0mm) and type of anchorage (monocortical and bicortical) in bovine rib. The primary stability was evaluated by insertion torque, micromobility and pull-out strength tests. ANOVA and/or Tukey analysis were used to conduct intergroup comparisons (p< 0.05). Non-parametric statistics (Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney) were performed when normality was not found (p< 0.05). Results: MIs with larger diameters and bicortical anchorage showed greater primary stability regarding insertion torque (p< 0.05) and micromobility (p< 0.05). Only MI diameter had an effect on the pull-out strength test. Larger diameter MIs presented better retention in pull-out strength tests (p< 0.001), regardless of mono- or bicortical anchorage. Conclusions: MI primary stability is dependent on its diameter and type of anchorage. Bicortical anchorage showed greater stability when compared with monocortical anchorage, independently of other variables.


2020 ◽  
Vol 49 (1) ◽  
pp. 382-393
Author(s):  
Ravinder Pal Singh ◽  
Vishal Gupta ◽  
Pulak Mohan Pandey ◽  
Asit Ranjan Mridha

2018 ◽  
Vol 8 (11) ◽  
pp. 2261
Author(s):  
Sangho Jun ◽  
Hyonseok Jang ◽  
Enji Cheon ◽  
MinJu Kim ◽  
Sungwon Ju ◽  
...  

The aim of this study was to analyze the load distribution of interim restorations using healing cap during immediate loading implant treatment in vitro. A total of 29 models with interim restorations which were fabricated with healing cap were selected. The pull-out strength was measured with a used healing cap and new healing cap. The compressive strength and sinking distance were also measured. The pull-out strength of interim restoration showed lower value (max. 29.8 N) compared to the natural bite force. The sinking amounts were larger than normal tooth sinking. The sinking amounts of interim restorations fabricated on a healing cap were roughly 3 times (0.3–0.5 mm under 450 N) those of normal teeth. The interim restoration on plastic healing cap would be useful for immediate loading implant treatment.


2016 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
pp. 8
Author(s):  
◽  
D. G. Kiparisova ◽  
N. S. Nurieva ◽  
Ju. S. Kiparisov

2010 ◽  
Vol 13 (4) ◽  
pp. 521-525 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cláudia Trindade Mattos ◽  
Antônio Carlos de Oliveira Ruellas ◽  
Carlos Nelson Elias

2012 ◽  
Vol 82 (6) ◽  
pp. 1022-1028 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lindsy Holm ◽  
Susan J. Cunningham ◽  
Aviva Petrie ◽  
Richard R. J. Cousley

2015 ◽  
Vol 1 (4) ◽  
pp. 177 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohammed Mandsaurwala ◽  
Ajit Kalia ◽  
Gaurav Gupta ◽  
Ashwith Hegde ◽  
Nasim Mirdehghan

2011 ◽  
Vol 33 (4) ◽  
pp. 396-401 ◽  
Author(s):  
B. Wilmes ◽  
A. Panayotidis ◽  
D. Drescher

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document